Post-hoc efficacy and biomarker analysis of elraglusib plus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus chemotherapy alone in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

D Devalingam Mahalingam R Rachna Shroff (Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ) B Benedito A. Carneiro (Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI) Y Yan Ji A Andrew L. Coveler A Andres Cervantes (Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain) V Vaibhav Sahai A Anne Ploquin (Lille University Hospital, Lille, France) S Sandrine Hiret (Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, St Herblain, France) N Noelle K. LoConte I Ivor John Percent (Florida Cancer Specialists, Port Charlotte, FL) C Charles D. Lopez (Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR) S Simon Pernot (Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Bergonié Cancer Center, Bordeaux, Nouvelle Aquitaine, France) P Petr Kavan M Mary Frances Mulcahy (Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL) R Ryan Michael Carr (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) F Francis J. Giles (DTC, Chicago, IL) A Andrew Paul Mazar (Actuate Therapeutics, Inc., Fort Worth, TX) M Mark Jaros (Summit Analytical, Denver, CO) T Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab

Abstract

4213 Background: Elraglusib (9-ING-41), a glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) inhibitor, has multimodal antitumor activity. In the international, open-label, randomized phase 2 1801 Part 3B study, elraglusib plus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP) was evaluated in previously untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), with patients randomized 2:1 to weekly elraglusib/GnP or GnP alone. Primary endpoints were median overall survival (mOS) and 1-year survival. The GnP control arm demonstrated shorter mOS than contemporary randomized trials (7.2 months vs 9.2 months in NAPOLI-3 and 9.7 months in PASS-01), driven by higher early mortality (0–2 months: 23.1% vs 10.1% in NAPOLI-3). Given balanced randomization, similar early mortality was inferred in the elraglusib/GnP arm, prompting post-hoc analyses to contextualize efficacy and identify factors associated with early death. Methods: Efficacy and safety were summarized descriptively. Time-to-event endpoints were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier estimates, log-rank testing, and Cox proportional hazards models. Response rates were compared using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test. Post-hoc subgroup, sensitivity, and machine-learning–based multivariate analyses explored clinical, demographic, and biomarker correlates of survival and early mortality. Results: In the full randomized population (elraglusib/GnP n=155; GnP n=78), elraglusib/GnP improved mOS by 2.9 months versus GnP (10.1 vs 7.2 months; HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.46–0.84; p=0.01), with 1-year survival rates of 44.1% versus 22.3%. Among patients receiving ≥1 full treatment cycle, mOS was 12.5 months with elraglusib/GnP and 8.5 months with GnP, comparable to contemporary registrational trials. Across multiple post-hoc sensitivity analyses—including evaluable patients, those matched to NAPOLI-3 baseline tumor burden, patients treated in the EU (early mortality 4%), and those achieving ≥20% CA19-9 decline within the first 1–2 cycles—elraglusib/GnP consistently demonstrated a ≥4-month OS advantage. Early death was associated with low baseline albumin (<3 g/dL), high CA19-9 (>800 U/mL), high tumor burden, and KRAS, TP53, and CDKN2A co-mutations. Conclusions: The elevated early mortality in the GnP control arm reflects enrollment of a heterogeneous, real-world mPDAC population with less restrictive eligibility than recent registrational trials. Post-hoc analyses identify key clinical and molecular drivers of early death and confirm a consistent survival benefit with elraglusib/GnP. These hypothesis-generating findings directly inform eligibility criteria, stratification, and endpoint assumptions for the planned phase 3 trial. Clinical trial information: NCT03678883 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 4213-4213
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

D

Devalingam Mahalingam

R

Rachna Shroff

Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ

B

Benedito A. Carneiro

Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI

Y

Yan Ji

A

Andrew L. Coveler

A

Andres Cervantes

Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

V

Vaibhav Sahai

A

Anne Ploquin

Lille University Hospital, Lille, France

S

Sandrine Hiret

Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, St Herblain, France

N

Noelle K. LoConte

I

Ivor John Percent

Florida Cancer Specialists, Port Charlotte, FL

C

Charles D. Lopez

Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR

S

Simon Pernot

Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Bergonié Cancer Center, Bordeaux, Nouvelle Aquitaine, France

P

Petr Kavan

M

Mary Frances Mulcahy

Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL

R

Ryan Michael Carr

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

F

Francis J. Giles

DTC, Chicago, IL

A

Andrew Paul Mazar

Actuate Therapeutics, Inc., Fort Worth, TX

M

Mark Jaros

Summit Analytical, Denver, CO

T

Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab