Positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) and minimal residual disease (MRD) for efficacy assessment in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed myeloma (Ti NDMM) patients (pts): IMROZ analysis.
Abstract
7551 Background: MRD is a measure of response in the bone marrow (BM) but is limited by patchy infiltration of BM plasma cells and lack of plasmacytoma assessment. Imaging-based MRD assessment, which is non-invasive, such as PET/CT, may overcome these limitations, and distinguish metabolically active MM from non-active. Isatuximab (Isa) is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody approved in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) in Ti NDMM pts based on the Phase 3 IMROZ study. Here, we present an analysis of IMROZ (NCT03319667), investigating PET/CT negativity (−) with MRD− in front line efficacy assessment. Methods: In IMROZ, pts were randomized 3:2 to receive Isa-VRd or VRd as initiation, then Isa-Rd or Rd as maintenance. BM MRD was assessed by next generation sequencing at 10 -5 sensitivity at baseline (BL), then in case of complete response (CR) or very good partial response at end of initiation, and every 6 months for 2 years, then once a year until disease progression (PD). PET/CT scans were assessed by central review and performed at BL, then yearly until PD; if positive for soft tissue plasmacytoma, repeated at time of CR and/or end of induction, then following time points for MRD assessment. PET/CT positivity (+) was defined as FDG 5PS Score ≥4, and PET/CT− as FDG 5PS ≤3. Results: Across the global and China populations, 244 Isa-VRd and 162 VRd pts had PET/CT at BL, of which 153 (62.7%) and 101 (62.3%) were PET/CT+, respectively. Of these, 121 (41.6%) and 83 (43.0%) had a post-BL PET/CT assessment. 155 pts presented with plasmacytoma at BL (95 Isa-VRd, 60 VRd), with comparable BL characteristics to the global population. Among PET+ pts at BL, the double negativity rate (PET/CT FDG 5PS score ≤3 + MRD−) was significantly higher in Isa-VRd pts than VRd (odds ratio [OR] 1.54; 95% CI 1.04-2.29; p=0.0155), and similarly for double negativity + ≥CR (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.07-2.38; p=0.0108). As shown in Table, more Isa-VRd than VRd pts with plasmacytoma reached PET/CT 5PS ≤3 and MRD−, and PET/CT 5PS ≤3 with MRD− + ≥CR. Progression-free survival (PFS) in pts PET/CT+ at BL was in favor of the Isa-VRd arm (median PFS [mPFS] not reached [NR; 95% CI 59.4-NR]) vs VRd (mPFS 49.1 [95% CI 39.1 -NR]) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58; 95% CI 0.39-0.88; p=0.6303), and HR was comparable to the intent to treat population. PFS in pts with plasmacytoma at BL was similar to the global population (HR 0.685; 95% CI 0.40-1.18; p=0.5332). Conclusions: This analysis of IMROZ shows the prognostic value of BL PET/CT findings. More Isa-VRd pts reached double negativity than VRd, including pts with plasmacytomas. This translated to a better PFS in pts treated with Isa-VRd. Clinical trial information: NCT03319667 . Isa-VRd (n=77) VRd (n=52) PET/CT 5PS score ≤3 and MRD−, % 45.5 34.6 OR (95% CI), p 1.57 (0.76-3.26), 0.1107 PET/CT 5PS score ≤3 and MRD− + ≥CR, % 44.2 32.7 OR (95% CI), p 1.63 (0.78-3.39), 0.0966
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Elena Zamagni
Thierry Facon
6Department of Hematology, University Hospital and INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche S1277, Lille, France
Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos
Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens
Xavier P. Leleu
Hématologie and Inserm CIC 1082, Poitiers, France
Meral Beksac
Ludek Pour
Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
Roman Hajek
Zhuogang Liu
1Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
Jiri Minarik
1Palacky University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
Philippe Moreau
Joanna Romejko-Jarosińska
Ivan Špička
9Charles University and General Faculty Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Tom G. Martin
Department of Hematology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Lugui Qiu
Christos Sachpekidis
Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
Ercem Kodas
18R&D, Sanofi, Vitry-sur-Seine, France
Helgi Van de Velde
Liang Zhao
Robert Orlowski
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Hartmut Goldschmidt
Internal Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group Study Group, Heidelberg University Hospital and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany