Polypharmacy and potential drug–drug interactions with novel androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) in patients (pts) with high-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in a real-world setting.

E Edwin Albert D'Souza (Hospital das Clinicas da FMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil) P Paulo Roberto Villa (Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) C Chang Chiann (Institute of Mathematics and Statistics USP, São Paulo, Brazil) G Guilherme Keichi Nakandakare (Universidade de São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil) R Rafael Costa (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) D David Queiroz Borges Muniz (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) G Guilherme Filaho de Freitas (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) V Vivian Naomi Horita (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) J João Carlos Resende Martins (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) L Leopoldo Alves Ribeiro-Filho (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) C Caio Suartz (Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada) W Wilson Calvo (Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares - IPEN-CNEN, São Paulo, Brazil) E Elaine Bortoleti de Araujo (Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares - IPEN-CNEN, São Paulo, Brazil) W William Carlos Nahas (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) J Jose Mauricio Mota (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil)

Abstract

346 Background: Patients (pts) with nmCRPC are typically elderly, with comorbidities often leading to polypharmacy and a higher risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Efficacy and safety of ARPIs may be compromised by DDIs. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and relevance of polypharmacy and potential DDIs involving ARPIs in a real-world setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort (March 2009 to July 2023) at a tertiary cancer center. Patients with high-risk nmCRPC were defined by ≥3 consecutive PSA rises and a PSA doubling time (PSADT) <10 months, with no metastasis on conventional imaging (CT and bone scans), as per criteria from pivotal trials (SPARTAN, PROSPER, ARAMIS). DDIs were assessed using Drugs.com and Lexicomp. Polypharmacy was defined as >4 concomitant drugs. Overall survival (OS), prostate cancer–specific survival (PCSS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were estimated from nmCRPC diagnosis by the Kaplan–Meier method and analyzed with univariate Cox models. Results: A total of 1,234 pts with prostate cancer (ICD-10 C61) were screened, and 96 had high-risk nmCRPC. Median age was 73 years (IQR 69–80), PSA 3.0 ng/mL (IQR 1.1–8.5), PSADT 3.3 months (IQR 1.8–5.6), and Charlson Comorbidity Index 5 (IQR 5–7). Most patients (97%) used at least 1 concomitant medication, with a median of 4 (IQR 3–6). Polypharmacy occurred in 43% and was associated with a trend to shorter OS (3.6 vs 4.5 y; HR 1.53, 95% CI 0.93–2.47, p = 0.08) and PCSS (3.6 vs 5.1 y; HR 1.52, 95% CI 0.95–2.47, p = 0.09), but not MFS (2.1 vs 2.9 y, p = 0.64). Potential DDIs were more frequent with enzalutamide and apalutamide (Table). Amlodipine (18%) was the most common major interaction in the Drugs.com database; omeprazole (18%) was most associated with prohibitive interactions (risk rating X) in Lexicomp. Cross-database inconsistencies were identified: 1 major and 15 moderate interactions reported only in Drugs.com, and 6 Lexicomp category C interactions not listed in Drugs.com. Conclusions: Polypharmacy and potential DDIs with ARPIs are common in nmCRPC. Although darolutamide was associated with fewer interactions, some major or X-rated DDIs were observed, reinforcing the need for individualized management and database cross-checking. Potential DDIs with ARPIs in different databases. Drugs.com – n (%) Minor Moderate Major Enzalutamide 1 (1%) 83 (86.4%) 28 (29.1%) Apalutamide 1 (1%) 82 (85.4%) 28 (29.1%) Darolutamide 27 (28.1%) 20 (20.1%) 2 (2.1%) Lexicomp – n (%) C D X Enzalutamide 60 (62.5%) 9 (9.37%) 1 (1%) Apalutamide 49 (51%) 7 (7.3%) 20 (20.8%) Darolutamide 40 (41.6%) 1 (1%) 1 (1%)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 346-346
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (15)

E

Edwin Albert D'Souza

Hospital das Clinicas da FMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil

P

Paulo Roberto Villa

Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

C

Chang Chiann

Institute of Mathematics and Statistics USP, São Paulo, Brazil

G

Guilherme Keichi Nakandakare

Universidade de São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil

R

Rafael Costa

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

D

David Queiroz Borges Muniz

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

G

Guilherme Filaho de Freitas

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

V

Vivian Naomi Horita

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

J

João Carlos Resende Martins

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

L

Leopoldo Alves Ribeiro-Filho

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

C

Caio Suartz

Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada

W

Wilson Calvo

Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares - IPEN-CNEN, São Paulo, Brazil

E

Elaine Bortoleti de Araujo

Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares - IPEN-CNEN, São Paulo, Brazil

W

William Carlos Nahas

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

J

Jose Mauricio Mota

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil