Plasma metabolic signatures in epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis: The application of NextGen Metabolomics in gynecologic oncology.

P Paulo D'Amora (Nagourney Cancer Institute, Long Beach, CA) I Ismael DCG Silva (Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) A Adam Jeremiah Nagourney (Nagourney Cancer Institute, Long Beach, CA) S Steven Scott Evans (Nagourney Cancer Institute, Long Beach, CA) K Krishnansu Sujata Tewari (GOG Foundation and University of California Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, CA) R Robert E. Bristow (UCI Gynecologic Oncology, Orange, CA) F Federico Francisco (Nagourney Cancer Institute, Long Beach, CA) D Derrick Phu (Nagourney Cancer Institute, Long Beach, CA) R Robert Alan Nagourney (Nagourney Cancer Institute, Long Beach, CA)

Abstract

e17593 Background: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. The lack of reliable diagnostic tests for early detection has led to the majority of EOC patients being diagnosed with advanced stage disease. Despite advances, most patients continue to suffer recurrence within 5 years following surgery and platinum (CDDP)-based chemotherapy. As malignant transformation is associated with metabolic re-programming, plasma-based biochemical signatures may offer biomarkers for the earlier detection of EOC. We previously reported the application of quantitative Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS) for the identification of CDDP resistance in EOC (D’Amora et al., Gynecol Oncol, 2021). Here we report the application of plasma MS/MS signatures for the detection of EOC. Methods: Following informed consent, EOC patients and controls provided EDTA blood samples with plasma was stored at -80 C. Quantitative MS/MS was performed using the Absolute IDQ p180 on a Sciex 6500 triple Quad MS. Amino acid (AA), lipid, acyl-carnitine, and hexose concentrations were compared with internal and external standards (NIST). Data analyses used MetaboAnalyst 3.0 to develop training sets in the original 13 EOC and 31 controls that were then validated in 34 EOC and 100 controls confirming diagnostic accuracy. Results: Plasma lipidomic profiles comparing EOC with controls provided highly significant differences that included micro-molar concentrations of Palmitic acid (C16) (p-1.07E-06), Oleic acid (C18:1) (p=1.37E-17) and the ratio of acyl-carnitine/carnitine (AcylC/C0) (p=1.07E-10). AA concentrations including Tryptophan (p=3.79E-22), branch chain amino acids (BCAA) (p=2.90E-07) and the Tryptophan/ Kynurenine ratio (TRP/KYN) (p=1.77E-11) were also significantly different for EOC versus controls. A composite equation comprised of AA and lipids (Valine/Phenylalanine)/(lysophophatidyl cholinePCaC16:0)/Trp} was found to predict disease free survival (DFS)(p =0.024). Conclusions: Malignant transformation in EOC reflects metabolic re-programming that can be identified and quantified in the plasma using targeted MS/MS. Changes in the concentrations of bioenergetic and structural lipids and AA’s reflect altered nutrient dependencies in transformed cells, while the ratio of TRP/KYN may reflect dysregulated immune response and surveillance. Plasma metabolite concentrations and select ratios provide insights into EOC pathogenesis that could be applied for diagnosis and prognosis. These MS/MS signatures have the potential to provide a new platform the earlier diagnosis of EOC.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (9)

P

Paulo D'Amora

Nagourney Cancer Institute, Long Beach, CA

I

Ismael DCG Silva

Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

A

Adam Jeremiah Nagourney

Nagourney Cancer Institute, Long Beach, CA

S

Steven Scott Evans

Nagourney Cancer Institute, Long Beach, CA

K

Krishnansu Sujata Tewari

GOG Foundation and University of California Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, CA

R

Robert E. Bristow

UCI Gynecologic Oncology, Orange, CA

F

Federico Francisco

Nagourney Cancer Institute, Long Beach, CA

D

Derrick Phu

Nagourney Cancer Institute, Long Beach, CA

R

Robert Alan Nagourney

Nagourney Cancer Institute, Long Beach, CA