Pirtobrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Treatment-Naïve and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

J Jennifer A. Woyach (5Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) L Lugui Qiu S Sebastian Grosicki (Department of Cancer Prevention, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland) T Tomasz Wróbel M Marcelo Capra (5Centro Integrado de Hematologia e Oncologia, Hospital Mãe de Deus, Porto Alegre, Brazil) J Jaroslaw Czyz (3Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland) S Shuhua Yi (4State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China) K Ki-Seong Eom (5Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea) A Anna Panovská (7Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic) W Wojciech Jurczak K Kamel Laribi (13CH du mans, Le Mans, France) L Lutz Jacobasch (11Praxis of Haematology and Oncology, Dresden, Germany) R Ross Baker (1Perth Blood Institute, Perth, Australia) R Richy Agajanian (13The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation, Whittier, United States) A Alejandro Berkovits (3Inmunocel, Santiago, Chile) M Muhit Ozcan (14Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye) S Stephane Lepretre (1Centre Henri Becquerel, Hematology, Rouen, France) C Catherine C. Coombs (University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA) P Paula Cramer (18Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Study Group, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany) K Katharine L. Lewis (Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia) M Marisa Hill (21Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States) K Katherine Bao (15Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States) Y Yuanyuan Bian (21Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States) S Silvia Ramalho De Batista Ribeiro (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) N Naleen Raj Bhandari (2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States) A Amy S. Ruppert (William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ching Ching Leow, MD, Amy S. Ruppert, PhD, and Yuanyuan Bian, PhD, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; and Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) C Ching Ching Leow (21Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States) W William G. Wierda (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States)

Abstract

PURPOSE Pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, noncovalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), has shown efficacy and safety in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) who received prior covalent BTKi. We report results, to our knowledge, from the first randomized head-to-head comparison of pirtobrutinib versus ibrutinib in BTKi-naïve CLL/SLL in both treatment-naïve (TN) patients and patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (N = 662) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pirtobrutinib or ibrutinib. All patients were BTKi-naïve. Primary end points were overall response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) among all randomly assigned patients (intention to treat [ITT]) and in patients with R / R disease. RESULTS The study met its primary end points, demonstrating statistically significant noninferiority (NI) of IRC-ORR for pirtobrutinib versus ibrutinib in both the ITT (87.0% [95% CI, 82.9 to 90.4] v 78.5% [95% CI, 73.7 to 82.9]; ORR ratio = 1.11 [95% CI, 1.03 to 1.19]; two-sided P < .0001) and R/R populations (n = 437; 84.0% [95% CI, 78.5 to 88.6] v 74.8% [95% CI, 68.5 to 80.4]; ORR ratio = 1.12 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.24]; two-sided P < .0001). In TN patients (n = 225), IRC-ORR was 92.9% (95% CI, 86.4 to 96.9) with pirtobrutinib versus 85.8% (95% CI, 78.0 to 91.7) with ibrutinib. Investigator assessed ORR results were consistent. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) favored pirtobrutinib in the ITT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.83]), R/R (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.47 to 1.13]), and TN (HR, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.59]) populations. Cardiac adverse event rates of atrial fibrillation/flutter and hypertension were lower with pirtobrutinib. CONCLUSION Pirtobrutinib demonstrated NI of ORR versus ibrutinib, with a favorable early PFS trend, particularly in TN patients, and a favorable safety profile including low rates of atrial fibrillation and hypertension.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 6
Published February 20, 2026
Pages 476-485
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (28)

J

Jennifer A. Woyach

5Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

L

Lugui Qiu

S

Sebastian Grosicki

Department of Cancer Prevention, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland

T

Tomasz Wróbel

M

Marcelo Capra

5Centro Integrado de Hematologia e Oncologia, Hospital Mãe de Deus, Porto Alegre, Brazil

J

Jaroslaw Czyz

3Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland

S

Shuhua Yi

4State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China

K

Ki-Seong Eom

5Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

A

Anna Panovská

7Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

W

Wojciech Jurczak

K

Kamel Laribi

13CH du mans, Le Mans, France

L

Lutz Jacobasch

11Praxis of Haematology and Oncology, Dresden, Germany

R

Ross Baker

1Perth Blood Institute, Perth, Australia

R

Richy Agajanian

13The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation, Whittier, United States

A

Alejandro Berkovits

3Inmunocel, Santiago, Chile

M

Muhit Ozcan

14Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye

S

Stephane Lepretre

1Centre Henri Becquerel, Hematology, Rouen, France

C

Catherine C. Coombs

University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA

P

Paula Cramer

18Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Study Group, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

K

Katharine L. Lewis

Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia

M

Marisa Hill

21Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States

K

Katherine Bao

15Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States

Y

Yuanyuan Bian

21Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States

S

Silvia Ramalho De Batista Ribeiro

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN

N

Naleen Raj Bhandari

2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States

A

Amy S. Ruppert

William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ching Ching Leow, MD, Amy S. Ruppert, PhD, and Yuanyuan Bian, PhD, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; and Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

C

Ching Ching Leow

21Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States

W

William G. Wierda

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States