Pirtobrutinib outcomes in second-line (2L) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) after first-line (1L) cBTKi therapy: A pooled analysis from the BRUIN LOXO-BTK-18001 and BRUIN CLL-321 studies
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Patients with CLL/SLL commonly receive a covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (cBTKi) as 1L therapy. However, most patients treated with a cBTKi eventually experience disease progression or treatment intolerance, ultimately requiring 2L therapy. Pirtobrutinib is a highly selective, noncovalent BTKi that inhibits BTK with low nanomolar potency throughout the once-daily dosing interval. Pirtobrutinib showed promising safety and efficacy in the phase 1/2 BRUIN LOXO-BTK-18001 study (NCT03740529), which was confirmed in the phase 3 BRUIN CLL-321 study (NCT04666038). Both studies were conducted in a broad population of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL, including those who previously received a cBTKi. Pirtobrutinib is approved in the European Union for the treatment of adults with R/R CLL after prior treatment with a BTKi and for adults in the United States with CLL/SLL who have received ≥2 lines of prior therapy, including a BTKi and a BCL-2 inhibitor (BCL2i). Here, we report the safety and efficacy of pirtobrutinib for patients with 2L CLL/SLL previously treated with 1L cBTKi therapy and no prior exposure to a BCL2i, using pooled data from the LOXO-BTK-18001 and CLL-321 studies. Methods: This pooled analysis from the LOXO-BTK-18001 and CLL-321 studies included BCL2i-naïve patients with CLL/SLL who received 2L pirtobrutinib monotherapy after 1L therapy with a cBTKi, with or without an anti-CD20 antibody. Progression-free survival (PFS) based on investigator assessment using iwCLL 2018 criteria, overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and safety data were analyzed. Results: All 37 eligible patients (LOXO-BTK-18001, N=17; CLL-321, N=20) received pirtobrutinib 200 mg once daily and received prior cBTKi treatment with ibrutinib (76%), acalabrutinib (14%), zanubrutinib (8%), or other cBTKi treatment (3%). Four patients (11%) also receivedan anti-CD20 antibody. The median age of patients was 69 years (range, 42–87). Among patients with evaluable samples, 22 of 26 (85%) had unmutated IGHV gene, 11 of 17 (65%) had complex karyotype (≥3 abnormalities), 13 of 30 (43%) had mutated TP53, and 15 of 31 (48%) had del(17p). Patients discontinued their prior cBTKi therapy due to disease progression (57%), toxicity (35%), or other reasons (8%). With a median follow-up of 30.3 months, median PFS was 19.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.7–44.7). For patients who discontinued their previous cBTKi due to disease progression (n=21), median PFS was 13.9 months (95% CI, 7.4–19.5) and for those who discontinued due to toxicity (n=13), median PFS was 44.7 months (95% CI, 10.6–not estimable). For all patients, median TTNT was 32.5 months (95% CI, 16.6–47.4). Median OS was not reached; the 24-month OS rate was 81.1% (95% CI, 61.9–91.3). Median time on treatment was 17.6 months (range, 0.9–57.2), and 13 patients (35%) remained on pirtobrutinib at data cutoff. Thirty-sixpatients (97%) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) of any grade. The most frequent TEAEs were anemia (27%), neutropenia/neutrophil count decreased (24%), hemorrhage/hematoma (22%), and pneumonia (22%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 68% of patients. Four patients experienced grade 5 events of COVID-19 pneumonia (n=1), pneumonia legionella (n=1), and pneumonia (n=2), none of which were treatment-related. Any-grade TEAEs of atrial fibrillation/flutter occurred in 1 patient (grade 3–4), hypertension in 5 patients (grade 3–4, n=4; grade 1–2, n=1), and hemorrhage in 8 patients (grade 1–2, n=6; grade 3, n=1; grade 4, n=1). Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) led to pirtobrutinib dose reductions in 3 patients. TRAEs led to pirtobrutinib discontinuation in 2 patients: grade 3 erythema and stomatitis (n=1), and grade 3 lymphocyte count increased (n=1). Conclusions: Pirtobrutinib demonstrated clinical benefit and tolerability in patients with 2L CLL/SLL previously treated with a cBTKi, including those with high-risk genetic features. These findings support the potential use of pirtobrutinib as a 2L therapy option after 1L cBTKi use and may help inform future treatment sequencing strategies.
Article Details
Authors (16)
Toby Eyre
3Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Cancer Center, Oxford, United Kingdom
Matthew S Davids
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Medical Oncology, Boston, United States
Jeff Sharman
15Willamette Valley Cancer Institute and Research Center, US Oncology Research, Eugene, United States
Paul Barr
1University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, United States
Catherine Coombs
2University of California Irvine, Irvine, United States
Wojciech Jurczak
Koji Izutsu
National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Meghan Thompson
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
William Wierda
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
Ying (denise) Wang
31Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States
Marisa Hill
21Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States
Donald Tsai
30Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States
Ching Ching Leow
21Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States
Sarang Abhyankar
2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States
Paolo Ghia
School of Medicine, Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan
Jennifer Woyach
31The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, United States