Pirtobrutinib in Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): Final update from the Phase 1/2 BRUIN study
Abstract
Abstract Background: Despite the efficacy of covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (cBTKi) in R/R MCL, patients (pts) ultimately discontinue treatment due to intolerance or development of resistance and disease relapse. Pirtobrutinib is a highly selective, non-covalent BTKi that inhibits BTK with low nM potency throughout the daily dosing interval. Pirtobrutinib was safe and effective in the phase 1/2 BRUIN study in pts with R/R B-cell malignancies, including those previously treated with a BTKi. Pirtobrutinib is approved in the EU for adults with R/R MCL after prior treatment with a BTKi (EMA Conditional Approval, Oct 2023), and in the USA for adults with R/R MCL after ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy, including a BTKi (FDA Accelerated Approval, Jan 2023).Here, we report the final results from the phase 1/2 BRUIN study (NCT03740529), with a follow-up period of up to 5 yrs, focusing on the efficacy and safety of pirtobrutinib in all R/R MCL pts. Methods: Pts with R/R MCL who received ≥1 prior lines of therapy (including BTKi) were eligible for treatment with pirtobrutinib monotherapy. Key endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS), all assessed by independent review committee (IRC) per Lugano 2014 criteria (presented here) and investigator, overall survival (OS), and safety. Pts were included across the range of doses evaluated in dose escalation and expansion (25-300 mg/day). A data cutoff on 27 January 2025 was utilized, with a median study follow-up of 17.5 months (range, 0.5-69.6). Results: Among the 166 pts with R/R MCL, 153 (92%) received the pirtobrutinib approved dose of 200 mg/day, 152 (92%) had received prior cBTKi, of which 128 (84.2%) discontinued any prior cBTKi due to progressive disease (PD), and 15 (9.9%) due to toxicity. The cBTKi-pre-treated pts had a median age of 70 yrs (range, 46-88), 52% had intermediate-risk and 28.3% had high-risk sMIPI scores. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range 1-9), with most pts having received a prior anti-CD20 antibody (96.7%) and chemotherapy (90.1%). Additional prior therapies included hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (21.7%; 19.7% auto and 4.6% allo), BCL-2 inhibitor (15.8%), CAR-T cell therapy (8.6%). As of the data cutoff, 11 (7.2%) pts who received a prior cBTKi and 6 (42.9%) cBTKi naïve pts remained on treatment. The cBTKi pre-treated pts had an ORR of 49.3% (95% CI, 41.1-57.6), including 15.8% complete responses (CR) (n=24) and 33.6% partial responses (PR) (n=51). The 75 responding pretreated pts had a median DOR of 21.6 months (95% CI, 9.2-27.2) at a median follow-up of 24 months. The ORR among 128 pts who had discontinued any prior cBTKi due to PD and 15 pts who discontinued due to toxicity was 43.0% and 93.3%, respectively. The median PFS and OS for cBTKi pre-treated pts were 5.6 months (95% CI, 5.3-9.2) and 23.9 months (95% CI, 17.3-51.5), respectively. Fourteen pts (9.2%) were censored for PFS due to subsequent anticancer therapy without documented PD, including 8 pts who received CAR-T. The cBTKi naïve pts (n=14) had an ORR of 85.7% (95% CI, 57.2-98.2), including 50.0% CR (n=7) and 35.7% PR (n=5). The 12 responding naïve pts had a median DOR of 42.7 months (95% CI, 25.8-NE) at a median follow-up of 43 months. The median PFS and OS in the cBTKi naïve pts were 44.6 months (95% CI, 16.7-NE) and not reached (95% CI, 33.5-NE), respectively. Among all R/R MCL pts (n=166), the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), regardless of attribution, were fatigue (31.9%), diarrhea (22.9%), anemia (18.1%), and dyspnea (18.1%). The most common Grade ≥3 TEAE was neutropenia/neutrophil count decreased (13.3%), and the rate of Grade ≥3 infections was 21.1%. Grade ≥3 hemorrhage/hematoma (2.4%) and all-grade atrial fibrillation/flutter (3.6%) were infrequent. In total, 13 (7.8%) pts had a fatal TEAE, with 4 (2.4%) classified as infections. Overall, 8 pts (4.8%) had treatment-related AE leading to dose reductions, and 6 (3.6%) had treatment-related AE leading to pirtobrutinib discontinuation. Conclusion: Pirtobrutinib continues to demonstrate efficacy in pts with heavily pre-treated R/R MCL including both those who previously received a cBTKi and those who were BTKi-naïve. The safety profile of pirtobrutinib remained favorable with a low-rate of dose reductions/discontinuations due to drug-related toxicity. No new safety signals were identified after up to 5 yrs of follow-up.
Article Details
Authors (37)
Michael Wang
Jonathon Cohen
15Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta CA
Nirav Shah
7MCW Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States
Wojciech Jurczak
Pier Luigi Zinzani
12IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli,” Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Chan Cheah
20Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia
Chaitra Ujjani
15Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
Youngil Koh
Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University, Jongno-gu, Seoul, South Korea
Won Seog Kim
Sunita Dwivedy Nasta
1Lymphoma Program, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
Ian Flinn
10OneOncology and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN
Benoit Tessoulin
Service d’Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France
Shuo Ma
Alvaro Alencar
20Department of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
David Lewis
Jennifer Woyach
31The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, United States
Kami Maddocks
1The Ohio State University, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, United States
Krish Patel
C. U. Shah Medical College, Surendranagar, India
Yucai Wang
State Key Laboratory of Immune Response and Immunotherapy, Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine
Joanna Rhodes
21Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, United States
Constantine Tam
1Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
John Seymour
7Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
Hirokazu Nagai
19National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Aichi, Japan
Julie Vose
22University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
Bita Fakhri
1Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
Marc Hoffmann
Francisco Hernandez-Ilizaliturri
21Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
Andrew Zelenetz
1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States
Anita Kumar
1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States
Talha Munir
12St. James's University Hospital, Department of Haematology, Leeds, United Kingdom
Donald Tsai
30Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States
Paolo Abada
2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
Minna Balbas
2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
Jian Li
Ying (denise) Wang
31Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States
Lindsey Roeker
5Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Toby Eyre
3Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Cancer Center, Oxford, United Kingdom