Pirtobrutinib in post-cbtki CLL/SLL: Final update from the Phase 1/2 BRUIN study with more than 5 years follow-up
Abstract
Abstract Background: Covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (cBTKi) have dramatically changed the treatment (tx) landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), especially in the first-line setting. However, cBTKi resistance or intolerance eventually occurs. Pirtobrutinib is a highly selective, non-covalent BTKi that inhibits BTK with low nM potency throughout the daily dosing interval. Pirtobrutinib demonstrated safety and efficacy in the phase 1/2 BRUIN study among patients (pts) with R/R CLL/SLL, including pts previously treated with a BTKi. Pirtobrutinib is approved for treating CLL in adults in the EU after prior tx with a BTKi, and in the USA for adults with CLL/SLL who have received at least 2 prior lines of therapy, including a BTKi and a BCL-2i. Here, we report the final results from the phase 1/2 BRUIN study (NCT03740529) with more than 5 years (yrs) follow-up (f/u), focusing on efficacy and safety of pirtobrutinib in pts with CLL/SLL in the post-cBTKi setting. Methods: Pts with prior cBTKi-exposed CLL/SLL were eligible for tx with pirtobrutinib. Endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) per 2018 iwCLL criteria, ORR including partial response with lymphocytosis (PR-L), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by independent review committee (IRC; presented herein) and investigator, overall survival (OS), and safety. Data cut was 27 January 2025, providing a median study f/u of 34.1 months (mos; range, 0.5-69.8). Results: Among the 282 pts with CLL/SLL who were cBTKi-exposed and treated with pirtobrutinib, of which 84.4% (238/282) received 200 mg as the starting dose, the median age was 69 yrs (range, 36-88). The median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1-11), with 45.4% of pts having received prior BCL2i, and 77.0% having discontinued prior cBTKi due to progressive disease (PD), 19.5% due to toxicity, and 3.5% due to other reasons/missing. High-risk features were frequent: unmutated IGHV in 85.8% (193/225), mutated TP53 in 40.4% (99/245), and del(17p) in 29.2% (59/202). The ORR was 72.3% (95% CI, 66.7-77.5). ORR including PR-L was 81.6% (95% CI, 76.5-85.9), which was consistent across subgroups including BCL2i-exposed (80.5%; 95% CI, 72.5-86.9), BCL2i-naive (82.5%; 95% CI, 75.5-88.1), unmutated IGHV (82.9%; 95% CI, 6.8-87.9), del(17p) (88.1%; 95% CI, 77.1-95.1), and prior cBTKi discontinuation due to PD (79.7%; 95% CI, 73.8, 84.9) or toxicity (87.5%; 95% CI, 76.8-94.4). The median DOR was 18.4 mos (95% CI, 14.82-20.27), with 36-mos DOR rate of 28.0% (21.6-34.7). The median PFS was 18.7 mos (95% CI, 16.6-21.8) among all pts and the 36-mos PFS rate was 25.0% (95% CI, 19.4-31.0) with 44 mos of f/u. Further, the median PFS was 22.3 mos (95% CI, 19.3-27.6) for BCL2i-naive pts, and 15.9 mos (95% CI, 13.6-17.5) for BCL2i-exposed pts; 16.6 mos (95% CI, 13.8-19.4) among those who discontinued prior cBTKi therapy due to PD, and not estimable (NE) (95% CI, 25.2-NE) in those who discontinued due to toxicity. Among all pts with CLL/SLL, with a median f/u of 46.5 mos, the median OS was NE (95% CI, 47.8-NE), with the 36-mos OS rate of 62.0% (95% CI, 55.8-67.7). Median time on pirtobrutinib was 20.0 mos (range, 0.2-69.8), and 43 (15.2%) pts were still on tx at data cutoff. The most frequent TEAEs, regardless of attribution, were fatigue (38.7%), neutropenia/neutrophil count decreased (35.8%), diarrhea (30.5%), cough (29.8%), COVID-19 (28.4%), and contusion (27.7%). The most frequent grade ≥3 TEAEs were infection (36.5%) and neutropenia/neutrophil count decreased (29.8%). Low rates of grade ≥3 TEAE of hypertension (5.3%), hemorrhage/hematoma (2.5%), and atrial fibrillation/flutter (2.1%) were observed. Grade 5 TEAEs, regardless of attribution, occurred in 35 (12.4%) pts. Overall, 11 (3.9%) pts had a TRAE leading to a dose reduction, and 9 (3.2%) pts had a TRAE leading to pirtobrutinib discontinuation. Conclusion: In heavily pretreated R/R post-cBTKi CLL/SLL pts, pirtobrutinib continues to show favorable and durable efficacy. Pirtobrutinib is well-tolerated, with low rates of hypertension, hemorrhage/hematoma, and atrial fibrillation/flutter, which can be frequently observed with cBTKi. Additionally, dose reductions/discontinuations due to pirtobrutinib TRAEs were low. No new pirtobrutinib safety signals were identified with more than 5 yrs of f/u.
Article Details
Authors (36)
William Wierda
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
Jennifer Brown
10Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
Paolo Ghia
School of Medicine, Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan
Lindsey Roeker
5Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Krish Patel
C. U. Shah Medical College, Surendranagar, India
Toby Eyre
3Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Cancer Center, Oxford, United Kingdom
Talha Munir
12St. James's University Hospital, Department of Haematology, Leeds, United Kingdom
Ewa Lech-Maranda
13Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
Nicole Lamanna
4Columbia University, New York, United States
Constantine Tam
1Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
John Seymour
7Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
Benoit Tessoulin
Service d’Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France
Nirav Shah
7MCW Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States
Chaitra Ujjani
15Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
Bita Fakhri
1Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
Catherine Coombs
2University of California Irvine, Irvine, United States
Ian Flinn
10OneOncology and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN
Manish Patel
Sunita Dwivedy Nasta
1Lymphoma Program, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
Jonathon Cohen
15Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta CA
Alvaro Alencar
20Department of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
Chan Cheah
20Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia
Shuo Ma
Joanna Rhodes
21Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, United States
Deepa Jagadeesh
1Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland, United States
Pier Luigi Zinzani
12IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli,” Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Anders Österborg
28Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, United States
Koji Izutsu
National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Noriko Fukuhara
1Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Hematology, Sendai, Japan
Donald Tsai
30Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States
Paolo Abada
2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
Minna Balbas
2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
Jian Li
Ying (denise) Wang
31Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States
Wojciech Jurczak
Jennifer Woyach
31The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, United States