Physical activity and molecular residual disease (MRD) in stage III colon cancer: Findings from CALGB (Alliance)/SWOG 80702.

G George Q. Zhang (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA) C Chao Ma Q Qian Shi J Jonathan Andrew Nowak (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA) L Levi D. Pederson (1Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) T Tyler Twombly (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA) J Juha P. Väyrynen M Melissa M. Zhao (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA) Y Yasutoshi Takashima (Dana Faber Cancer Institute) A Ardaman Shergill (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago) P Pankaj Kumar (Department of Chemistry) F Felix Couture J J. Philip Kuebler (Columbus NCI Community Oncology Research Program, Columbus, OH) S Smitha S. Krishnamurthi (Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) B Benjamin R. Tan (Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO) S Shuji Ogino J Justin Brown A Adham A. Jurdi (Natera, Inc., Austin, TX) A Anthony F. Shields (Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI) J Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt

Abstract

163 Background: Being physically inactive is an independent predictor of poor outcomes in patients with stage III colon cancer. Whether physical activity can mitigate the oncologic risk of postoperative MRD is unknown. Methods: We concluded a post hoc analysis of a phase III trial evaluating celecoxib vs. placebo and 3 vs. 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resected stage III colon cancer. Self-reported physical activity was assessed in standardized measures of metabolic equivalent hours per week (MET-h/wk) at 2 timepoints: 1) midway through and 2) 6 months after completing adjuvant chemotherapy, modeled as a time-weighted average. MRD was determined via a clinically validated, tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay (Signatera, Natera, Inc.). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using flexible parametric survival models. Results: Among 763 patients (median follow-up 6.0 years), 24% were highly active (≥18 MET-h/wk) and 32% were inactive (<3 MET-h/wk); 18% were ctDNA positive. Adjusting for covariates, DFS improved in patients who were ctDNA negative and moderately active (Ref: inactive; 3-17.9 MET-h/wk; HR=0.62, 95% CI [0.40-0.97]) or highly active (HR = 0.53 [0.30-0.94]). No benefit was seen among patients who were ctDNA positive (Ref: inactive; moderately active: HR = 1.20 [0.75-1.92]; highly active: HR=0.83 [0.45-1.54]). The interaction was not significant (Pint=0.269). Physical activity did not impact OS regardless of ctDNA status. The interaction of physical activity and adjuvant celecoxib use is shown in Table. Conclusions: Among patients who were ctDNA negative, physical activity was associated with improved DFS, and may demonstrate increased survival benefit alongside adjuvant celecoxib. The additive effects of both interventions were inconclusive among those who were ctDNA positive. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org; Natera, Pfizer; NCT01150045. Disease-free survival by physical activity level and celecoxib use, stratified by ctDNA status. 3-yr event # at risk Adjusted HR (95% CI) P-value Pint ctDNA Negative 0.258  Inactive + placebo 23 182 Ref  Active + placebo 17 132 0.74 (0.43-1.28) 0.283  Inactive + celecoxib 23 167 0.92 (0.57-1.48) 0.720  Active + celecoxib 10 146 0.40 (0.22-0.79) 0.007 ctDNA Positive 0.221  Inactive + placebo 26 33 Ref  Active + placebo 15 20 0.96 (0.50-1.84) 0.903  Inactive + celecoxib 34 54 0.62 (0.37-1.05) 0.076  Active + celecoxib 14 29 0.34 (0.18-0.64) 0.001 ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. Active = ≥9 MET-h/week, inactive = <9 MET-h/week. Celecoxib use defined by assignment in CALGB/SWOG 80702. Models adjusted by T and N stage, age, sex, race, assigned cycles of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin, KRAS and BRAF status, BMI, and Western diet.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 2_suppl
Published January 10, 2026
Pages 163-163
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

G

George Q. Zhang

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

C

Chao Ma

Q

Qian Shi

J

Jonathan Andrew Nowak

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

L

Levi D. Pederson

1Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

T

Tyler Twombly

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

J

Juha P. Väyrynen

M

Melissa M. Zhao

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Y

Yasutoshi Takashima

Dana Faber Cancer Institute

A

Ardaman Shergill

Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago

P

Pankaj Kumar

Department of Chemistry

F

Felix Couture

J

J. Philip Kuebler

Columbus NCI Community Oncology Research Program, Columbus, OH

S

Smitha S. Krishnamurthi

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

B

Benjamin R. Tan

Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

S

Shuji Ogino

J

Justin Brown

A

Adham A. Jurdi

Natera, Inc., Austin, TX

A

Anthony F. Shields

Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI

J

Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt