Phylogenomics reveals the slow-burning fuse of diatom evolution

A Andrew J. Alverson (Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas) W Wade R. Roberts (Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas) E Elizabeth C. Ruck (Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas) T Teofil Nakov (Escuela de Biología, Centro de Investigación en Ciencias del Mar y Limología, Universidad de Costa Rica) M Matthew P. Ashworth (Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin) K Karolina Bryłka (Department of Geology, Lund University) K Kala M. Downey (Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas) J J. Patrick Kociolek (Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado) M Matthew Parks (Department of Biology, University of Central Oklahoma) E Eveline Pinseel (Laboratory of Protistology en Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University) E Edward C. Theriot (Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin) S Simon P. Tye (Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas) A Andrzej Witkowski (Faculty of Physical, Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Institute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Szczecin) J Jeremy M. Beaulieu (Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas) N Norman J. Wickett (Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna)

Abstract

Evolution is often uneven in its pace and outcomes, with long periods of stasis interrupted by abrupt increases in morphological and ecological disparity. With thousands of gene histories, phylogenomics can uncover the genomic signatures of these broad macroevolutionary trends. Diatoms are a species-rich lineage of microeukaryotes that contribute greatly to the global cycling of carbon, oxygen, and silica, which they use to build elaborately structured cell walls. We combined fossil information with newly sequenced transcriptomes from 181 diverse diatom species to reconstruct the pattern, timing, and genomic context of major evolutionary transitions. Diatoms originated 270 Mya, and after >100 My of relative stasis in morphology and ecology, a radiation near the Jurassic–Cretaceous boundary led to the diversity of habitats and cell wall architectures characteristic of modern diatoms. This transition was marked by a genome duplication and high levels of gene tree discordance. However, short generation times increase the probability of coalescence between speciation events, minimizing the impacts of incomplete lineage sorting and implicating sequence saturation and gene tree error as the main sources of discordance. Nevertheless, a rigorous tree-based approach to ortholog selection resulted in strongly supported relationships, including some that were uncertain previously. Three pulses of accelerated speciation were detected, two of which were associated with the evolution of novel traits and ecological transitions. The first 100 My of diatom evolution was a slow-burning fuse that led to a burst of innovations in ecology, morphology, and life history that are hallmarks of contemporary diatom assemblages.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 122, Issue 22
Published June 03, 2025
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (15)

A

Andrew J. Alverson

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas

W

Wade R. Roberts

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas

E

Elizabeth C. Ruck

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas

T

Teofil Nakov

Escuela de Biología, Centro de Investigación en Ciencias del Mar y Limología, Universidad de Costa Rica

M

Matthew P. Ashworth

Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin

K

Karolina Bryłka

Department of Geology, Lund University

K

Kala M. Downey

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas

J

J. Patrick Kociolek

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado

M

Matthew Parks

Department of Biology, University of Central Oklahoma

E

Eveline Pinseel

Laboratory of Protistology en Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University

E

Edward C. Theriot

Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin

S

Simon P. Tye

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas

A

Andrzej Witkowski

Faculty of Physical, Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Institute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Szczecin

J

Jeremy M. Beaulieu

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas

N

Norman J. Wickett

Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna