Phylogenomics reveals the slow-burning fuse of diatom evolution
Abstract
Evolution is often uneven in its pace and outcomes, with long periods of stasis interrupted by abrupt increases in morphological and ecological disparity. With thousands of gene histories, phylogenomics can uncover the genomic signatures of these broad macroevolutionary trends. Diatoms are a species-rich lineage of microeukaryotes that contribute greatly to the global cycling of carbon, oxygen, and silica, which they use to build elaborately structured cell walls. We combined fossil information with newly sequenced transcriptomes from 181 diverse diatom species to reconstruct the pattern, timing, and genomic context of major evolutionary transitions. Diatoms originated 270 Mya, and after >100 My of relative stasis in morphology and ecology, a radiation near the Jurassic–Cretaceous boundary led to the diversity of habitats and cell wall architectures characteristic of modern diatoms. This transition was marked by a genome duplication and high levels of gene tree discordance. However, short generation times increase the probability of coalescence between speciation events, minimizing the impacts of incomplete lineage sorting and implicating sequence saturation and gene tree error as the main sources of discordance. Nevertheless, a rigorous tree-based approach to ortholog selection resulted in strongly supported relationships, including some that were uncertain previously. Three pulses of accelerated speciation were detected, two of which were associated with the evolution of novel traits and ecological transitions. The first 100 My of diatom evolution was a slow-burning fuse that led to a burst of innovations in ecology, morphology, and life history that are hallmarks of contemporary diatom assemblages.
Article Details
Journal Info
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Sciences
Authors (15)
Andrew J. Alverson
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas
Wade R. Roberts
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas
Elizabeth C. Ruck
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas
Teofil Nakov
Escuela de Biología, Centro de Investigación en Ciencias del Mar y Limología, Universidad de Costa Rica
Matthew P. Ashworth
Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin
Karolina Bryłka
Department of Geology, Lund University
Kala M. Downey
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas
J. Patrick Kociolek
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado
Matthew Parks
Department of Biology, University of Central Oklahoma
Eveline Pinseel
Laboratory of Protistology en Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University
Edward C. Theriot
Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin
Simon P. Tye
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas
Andrzej Witkowski
Faculty of Physical, Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Institute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Szczecin
Jeremy M. Beaulieu
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas
Norman J. Wickett
Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna