Phase II trial of asciminib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia.

M Maria Hachem (Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) F Fadi Haddad E Elias Jabbour (Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA) G Ghayas C. Issa K Koji Sasaki (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) L Lewis Fady Nasr (Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) J Jayastu Senapati (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center) H Hannah Goulart (1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States) A Alex Bataller (2Division of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) T Tapan M. Kadia (Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA) K Kara Stevens (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) J Joseph Castellano (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) G Guillermo Montalban-Bravo N Naveen Pemmaraju (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States) S Sara Dellasala (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States) H Hagop M. Kantarjian (Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA)

Abstract

6589 Background: Asciminib is safe and effective across all lines of therapy of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Here, we report interim results from an investigator-initiated phase II trial of asciminib in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed (ND) CML. Methods: Asciminib was given at 80 mg/day in pts with ND CML in chronic phase or accelerated phase (clonal evolution only). The primary endpoint was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months of therapy. AEs were recorded according to the CTCAE version 5.0 criteria. The data cutoff was January 20, 2026. Results: A total of 59 pts were treated with a median age at diagnosis of 49 years (range, 21-79); 33 (56%) were male. Sokal score was low in 29 pts (49%), intermediate in 21 (36%), and high in 9 (15%). With a median follow-up of 12 months, the cumulative best overall response was MCyR in 57 pts (97%), CCyR in 54 (92%), MMR in 40 (68%), MR4 in 21 (36%), and MR4.5 in 17 (29%). Among pts who completed at least 1 year of asciminib therapy, the MMR rate by 12 months was 71%. By 3 months, among 58 evaluable pts, 51 (88%) achieved MCyR or transcript levels below 10% on the international scale (IS), 42 (72%) CCyR or transcript levels below 1% IS, 16 (28%) MMR, 5 (9%) MR4, and 2 (3%) MR4.5. Seven pts (12%) had transcript levels above 10%. By 6 months, among 53 evaluable pts, the rate of CCyR was 85% (45/53), MMR 64% (34/53), MR4 34% (18/53), and MR4.5 26% (14/53). By 12 months, CCyR was achieved in 27 pts (87%), MMR in 22 (71%), MR4 in 13 (42%), and MR4.5 in 10 (32%). ASXL1 mutation was detected in 3 of 41 pts (7%) evaluated for cancer gene variants. Of them, two achieved a complete molecular response and one achieved CCyR as best response but later lost it with the acquisition of A337T and F497L mutations. The most frequent adverse events related or possibly related to asciminib included elevated lipase (Grade[G]2, n=9; G3, n=3; G4, n=1) and fatigue (G1, n=7; G2, n=2); 3 pts developed pancreatitis (G2, n=1; G3, n=2). A 71-year-old pt with a previous medical history of hypertension developed G5 acute coronary syndrome after 2.5 months of asciminib therapy. Overall, 8 of 59 pts (14%) discontinued asciminib due to: 1) adverse events in 4 (including 1 fatal acute coronary syndrome); 2) loss of CCyR in 2 (one with the emergence of A337T and F497L mutations and another with P465A and D381E mutations); 3) failure to achieve CCyR in 1 patient in the setting of cytopenias and asciminib dose reduction to 40 mg/day; and 4) withdrawal of consent by 1 patient due to inability to return to clinic for treatment due to social constraints and was in MR4 at the time of asciminib discontinuation. The 12-month rates of failure-free survival, event-free survival, transformation-free survival, and overall survival were 92%, 96%, and 98%, respectively. Conclusions: Treatment with asciminib in ND CML showed a MMR tare of 71% by 12 months of therapy with no new safety signals. Disease resistance was associated with the emergence of myristoyl pocket mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT06236724 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 6589-6589
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

M

Maria Hachem

Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

F

Fadi Haddad

E

Elias Jabbour

Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

G

Ghayas C. Issa

K

Koji Sasaki

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

L

Lewis Fady Nasr

Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

J

Jayastu Senapati

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

H

Hannah Goulart

1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States

A

Alex Bataller

2Division of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

T

Tapan M. Kadia

Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

K

Kara Stevens

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

J

Joseph Castellano

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

G

Guillermo Montalban-Bravo

N

Naveen Pemmaraju

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States

S

Sara Dellasala

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States

H

Hagop M. Kantarjian

Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA