Phase II study of frontline gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, and cisplatin (GemFLP) in advanced urachal and non-urachal urinary tract adenocarcinoma.

E Emanuele Crupi (Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy) J Jianjun Gao P Paul Gettys Corn (Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) L Lance C. Pagliaro (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) C Charles C. Guo (Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) B Bogdan Czerniak (Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) M Mohammad Jad Moussa (Internal Medicine Residency Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX) Z Zachariah Thomas C Cindy Y. Jiang (Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) O Omar Alhalabi (Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) M Matthew T. Campbell A Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX)

Abstract

4515 Background: Adenocarcinomas of the urinary tract are rare malignancies with limited prospective data. Outcomes of triplet chemotherapy remain poorly defined. Methods: This was a prospective, single-arm, phase II study (NCT00082706) conducted at MD Anderson. Between 2005 and 2010, patients (pts) aged ≥18 years with ECOG 0–2 and metastatic or unresectable urachal (UA) or non-urachal adenocarcinoma (NUA) received frontline GemFLP (5-fluorouracil 200 mg/m² continuous infusion ×5 days with leucovorin 23 mg IV daily ×5; cisplatin 20 mg/m² IV daily ×5; gemcitabine 200 mg/m² IV on days 1 and 5). Best overall response (BOR) was assessed by imaging. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS); secondary endpoint was toxicity. PFS was calculated from treatment initiation and duration of response (DoR) from first CR/PR to progression or death; time-to-event endpoints were estimated by Kaplan–Meier (KM). Post hoc analyses evaluated baseline tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, CA125, β-hCG) Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were graded per CTCAE v5. Results: Forty-six pts were enrolled (28 UA, 18 NUA). Median age was 58 years; 41% were de novo metastatic, and 78% had visceral metastases. ORR was 44% (20/46). Among responders, median DoR was 8.6 months (95% CI 4.6–30.8). median PFS was 3.3 months (95% CI 2.3–8.4) and median OS (mOS) was 21.0 months (95% CI 15.9–35.3) There was no difference in PFS (p=0.39) or OS (p=0.99) between UA and NUA. Baseline CEA, CA19-9, CA125, and β-hCG were not associated with ORR or PFS. Higher baseline CA125 was associated with inferior OS (HR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.12–1.58; p =0.001) Subsequent systemic therapy was administered to 28 pts (60.9%); median number of subsequent treatment lines was 2 (range 1–5). The most common hematologic TRAEs were anemia (28.1%; grade ≥3 [G3] 12.5%), thrombocytopenia (21.9%; G3 12.5%), and neutropenia (12.5%; G3 9.4%). The most frequent non-hematologic TRAEs were dehydration (21.9%; G3: 6.2%), diarrhea (9.4%; G3 6.2%) and catheter-related thrombosis (9.4%; G3 9.4%). No grade 5 events occurred. Conclusions: In this prospective phase II study, frontline GemFLP achieved a 44% ORR with durable responses (mDoR 8.6 mo) and 21 mo mOS in advanced UA and NUA. Survival did not differ between UA and NUA subtypes. Baseline CA125 was associated with OS. Toxicity was manageable. These data provide a prospective benchmark for this rare disease. Clinical trial information: NCT00082706 . Variable UA (n=28) NUA (n=18) Characteristics Age, median [ICR] 58 [54– 62] 58 [54– 62] 67 [ 62-72] Race, n (%) White 22 (79) 11 61) Black 6 (21) 6 (33) Other 0 1 (6) Prior surgery for localized disease, n (%) 18 (64) 5 (28) Mets at baseline Any 24 (86) 7 (39) Lung 6 (21) 4 (22) Liver 3 (11) 0 Peritoneum 17 (61) 0 Bone 3 (11) 3 (17) Nodal-only mets 1 (3) 2 (10) Outcomes ORR (%) 43.5 35.7 55.6 BOR n (%) CR 4 (14) 2 (11) PR 6 (21) 8 (44) SD 11 (39) 4 (22) PD 6 (21) 3 (17) NE 1 (4) 1 (6)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 4515-4515
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

E

Emanuele Crupi

Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy

J

Jianjun Gao

P

Paul Gettys Corn

Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

L

Lance C. Pagliaro

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

C

Charles C. Guo

Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

B

Bogdan Czerniak

Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

M

Mohammad Jad Moussa

Internal Medicine Residency Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX

Z

Zachariah Thomas

C

Cindy Y. Jiang

Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

O

Omar Alhalabi

Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

M

Matthew T. Campbell

A

Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX