Phase I trial of LB-100 plus doxorubicin as first-line of advanced soft tissue sarcomas: A Spanish Sarcoma Group (GEIS) study.
Abstract
11572 Background: In sarcomas, blocking the phosphatase PP2A with LB-100 enhanced doxorubicin effectiveness, reducing tumor growth and metastases in in vivo experiments. Mechanistically, LB-100 inhibited ATM/ATR-activated DNA damage response. The combination of doxorubicin and LB-100 significantly shrank tumor xenographs compared with either compound alone. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for LB-100 in monotherapy was 2.33 mg/m 2 /d x3 days in a phase I in progressive solid tumors, reporting 1 partial response and 16 SD (including the 2 enrolled patients with sarcoma) out of 20 patients. Based on prior data, we designed a phase I trial (NCT05809830) combining doxorubicin (D) and LB-100 (L) for first-line advanced sarcomas. Methods: Adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas and no prior anthracycline treatment were enrolled. The main endpoint was to determine the RP2D. Secondary endpoints were to evaluate the safety profile, efficacy (PFS, ORR,OS), QoL, and translational research. Dose levels were defined as follows, I: D 60 L 1.75; II: D 75 L 1.75; III: D 75 L 2.33; A -I dose-level was defined as D 60, L 1.25. L was administered on days 1 to 3 in a 2-hour IV infusion, followed by D in a 20-minute IV infusion on day 1 of each cycle. After 6 cycles of combination, L was administered as a maintenance phase until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Between June 2023 and September 2024, 14 out of 17 screened patients were recruited, with 12 eligible for DLT evaluation. The non-DLT-evaluable patients were explained by the use of G-CSF and the altered sequence of drug administration during the first cycle. No DLTs were reported. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia 42.9%, febrile neutropenia 21.4%, LVEF reduction 14.3%, and one patient each for nausea, anemia, and lymphopenia (7.1%). There were 2 partial responses (14%), 6 stabilizations (43%), and 6 progressions (43%) following RECIST criteria of 14 evaluable patients. Responses were seen in patients with UPS and myxofibrosarcoma. The mPFS was 5.7 months (95% CI 0-13.3), and the mOS was 16.7 months (95% CI NA). The only QoL items of EORTC-QLQ-C30 that significantly changed (impaired) between baseline and before the 3 rd cycle were nausea and diarrhea. There were 1SD and 2 PD of 3 patients in the first dose-level, 1 PR and 3SD of 4 patients in the second dose-level, and 1 PR, 2 SD, and 4 PD of 7 patients in the third dose-level. In our preclinical investigations, the highest concentrations of L induced an antagonistic effect with D. Conclusions: The RP2D is L1.75 and D 75 based on tolerance and activity, and it deserves to be tested in phase II trials. Clinical trial information: NCT05809830 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (15)
Javier Martin Broto
Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
Raul Terés
Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
Gloria Marquina
Jose Alejandro Perez-Fidalgo
Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Carlos Lopez-Jimenez
Fundación Jimenez Diaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; University Hospital General de Villalba, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Fundacion Jimenez Diaz (IIS/FJD; UAM), Madrid, Spain
Jose Luis Alonso-Romero
Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca-IMIB, Murcia, Spain
Andres Redondo
From the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Foundation (C.E.G., E.P.M., N.W., P.R., I.L.W., A.M.B.) and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine–UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (C.E.G., N.W., P.R., A.M.B.) — both in Pittsburgh; AGO-B and Helios Klinikum Berlin–Buch, Berlin (M.U.), the National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg (A.S.), Evangelische Kliniken Gelsenkirchen, Gelsenkirchen (H.H.F.), Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie–Breast and Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach (C.J.), the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–EMN, Friedrich–Alexander University Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg (P.W., S.L.), and the Center for Hematology and Oncology Bethanien, Goethe University, Frankfurt (S.L.) — all in Germany; National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine,...
Antonio Gutiérrez
Antonio Casado
Ana Sebio
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Medical Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
Patricio Ledesma
Jose Angel Merino-Garcia
Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
Empar Mayordomo
Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
David Silva Moura
Health Research Institute-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Autonomous University of Madrid (IIS-FJD, UAM), Madrid, Spain
Nadia Hindi