Phase I study of lower dose CPX-351 combined with venetoclax for patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia after hypomethylating agents failure
Abstract
Abstract Background: Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) higher-risk (HR) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) who have failed hypomethylating agent (HMA) have limited treatment options and poor outcomes. We previously demonstrated that the use of lower doses of CPX-351 (50 units/m2) are safe and effective in these pts (Montalban-Bravo, BJHaem 2023). Venetoclax (VEN) therapy enhances antileukemic efficacy of cytotoxic agents. Prior data suggest BCL2 upregulation in hematopoietic stem-progenitor populations is a mechanism of MDS progression. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the CPX-351 and VEN combination in pts with HMA-failure HR MDS or MDS/MPN. Methods: We conducted a phase I/II clinical trial for adult pts with R/R MDS or MDS/MPN after HMA failure (NCT03896269). Eligible pts had higher-risk (HR) disease by IPSS and ≥5% bone marrow (BM) blasts or 10-19% BM blasts and must be considered candidates for intensive chemotherapy and/or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Pts with complex and/or monosomal karyotypes in the presence of TP53 mutations were excluded. The phase I (dose-escalation) used a Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). During induction, pts received CPX-351 at 50 units/m² (dauno 22mg/m² and araC 50mg/m²) intravenously on days 1, 3, and 5, in combination with VEN on days 1-7 of a 28-day cycle. For re-induction and consolidation, CPX-351 at 50 units/m² was given on days 1 and 3, with VEN on days 1-7, for up to two cycles. Maintenance therapy consisted of azacitidine 75 mg/m² on days 1-5 and VEN on days 1-7. VEN dose level 1 was 400 mg daily, and dose level -1 was 200 mg. The primary objective was to assess the safety, tolerability, and MTD of the CPX-351 and VEN combination. The secondary objective was to evaluate clinical efficacy. Here, we report results from the phase I portion. Results: As of 28 July 2025, 6 pts were enrolled. Pts had a median age of 68 years (range, 52-72). 4 pts (67%) had MDS and 2 (33%) had CMML. One pt (17%) had intermediate-1 risk by IPSS and 10% blasts, 4 (66%) had intermediate-2 and 1 (17%) had high-risk disease. By IPSS-M, 3 pts were high-risk and one was very-high risk; pts with CMML were intermediate-2 and high-risk by CPSS-Mol. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 1 (range, 1-3); one pt (17%) had prior VEN and allo-SCT. 3 pts (50%) received VEN 400mg daily (DL1), and 3 (50%) received 200mg daily (DL-1). Pts received a median of one cycle of therapy (range, 1-3). The most common treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAEs) were mucositis (4pts, 67%), fever (4 pts, 67%), bleeding (3 pts, 50%), hypercalemia (3 pts, 50%), and hyperphosphatemia (3 pts, 50%). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were thrombocytopenia (3 pts, 50%), febrile neutropenia (2 pts, 33%), pneumonia (2 pts, 33%), and infection (2 pts, 33%). No 4-week and 8-week mortality were observed. One pt treated in DL1 experienced DLT in the form of prolonged myelosuppression. According to 2006 IWG response criteria, 3 pts (50%) achieved complete remission (CR), one pt (17%) achieved mCR, and one additional pt (17%) achieved mCR + HI, for an ORR of 84%, after a median of one cycle of therapy. Based on 2023 IWG response criteria, ORR was 84% (5 pts) including CR in 3 pts (50%), CR bilineage in 1 pt (17%), and CR unilineage in 1 pt (17%). The one pt (17%) with no response had previously received VEN and allo-SCT and is currently undergoing a re-induction cycle. Among responder pts with count recovery, the median time to neutrophil (≥1x109/L) and platelet (≥100x109/L) recovery were 33 and 26 days, respectively. At the cutoff date, 4 pts discontinued the trial to proceed to allo-SCT and 2 pts are currently receiving therapy. No pts had progressed to AML or died at a median follow-up of 7.6 months. Among responders, 1 of 2 pts with cytogenetic abnormalities at study enrollment achieved a complete cytogenetic response. All 4 pts with sequential next-generation sequencing (NGS) data at the time of response showed a reduction in variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of baseline somatic mutations or complete clearance of mutations. Conclusion: Lower-dose CPX-351 combined with VEN was well tolerated and demonstrated a high early response rate in this high-risk population, with a substantial number of pts undergoing allo-SCT. Enrollment is ongoing to further evaluate efficacy in a larger cohort.
Article Details
Authors (15)
Roberta S. Azevedo
1Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Elias Jabbour
Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
Danielle Hammond
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Kelly Chien
1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States
Tapan Kadia
2Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Steven Kornblau
1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States
Farhad Ravandi
Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
Gautam Borthakur
5MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
Naveen Pemmaraju
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
Hyunsoo Hwang
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
Xuelin Huang
Heather Schneider
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States
Meghan Meyer
Department of Psychology, Columbia University
Guillermo Montalban-Bravo