Phase 3 trial of trastuzumab rezetecan vs standard of care (SOC) for chemotherapy-refractory, HER2-positive, advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).

J Jin Li Y Ying Yuan T Tianshu Liu (Department of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai) X Xiuying Xiao (Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China) Y YuDong Wang F Fengbin Zhang (The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China) Z Zuoxing Niu Y Yanhong Deng Q Qiu Meng (West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China) H Hong Zong (Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China) Y Yigui Chen (Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China) X Xiang Gao J Jun Zhou X Xiaotong Li (Department of Chemistry and Organic and Carbon Electronics Laboratories (ORaCEL)) Y Yifan Shen (Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan) N Ning Dou (Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) C Chuanpei Huang (Clinical Research & Development, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China)

Abstract

3505 Background: Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting HER2 represents standard therapy for HER2-positive gastric cancer and breast cancer. This study aimed to assess trastuzumab rezetecan (an HER2-targeted ADC) vs SOC in patients (pts) with chemotherapy-refractory, HER2-positive, RAS and RAF wild-type advanced CRC. Methods: In this randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 trial, pts with HER2-positive, RAS and RAF wild-type, advanced CRC who have progressed after standard 2nd-line therapy were randomized 2:1 to receive trastuzumab rezetecan (4.8 mg/kg, d1, iv, q3w) or SOC (TAS-102 [35 mg/m 2 , bid, d1-5 and d8-12], fruquintinib [5 mg, qd, d1-21], or regorafenib [160 mg, qd, d1-21]; po, q4w). Randomization was stratified by HER2 status (IHC 3+ vs IHC 2+/ISH+) and ECOG PS (0 vs 1). Primary endpoint was PFS per RECIST v1.1 by independent review committee (IRC). Key secondary endpoint was OS. Results: As of data cutoff (Oct 31, 2025), 130 pts were randomly assigned to trastuzumab rezetecan (N=86) or SOC (N=44). 70.8% of pts had HER2 IHC 3+, and 57.7% had an ECOG PS of 1. Median follow-up was 9.6 mo (95% CI 7.4-10.7). PFS per IRC was significantly increased with trastuzumab rezetecan vs SOC (median 5.5 mo [95% CI 4.8-6.7] vs 2.8 mo [95% CI 2.2-4.2]; HR 0.33 [95% CI 0.21-0.53]; 1-sided p<0.0001). Although median OS were immature, risk of death with trastuzumab rezetecan was reduced by 23% compared with SOC (HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.35-1.73]). PFS per investigator, ORR and DoR were also better with trastuzumab rezetecan vs SOC (Table 1). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 48.8% with trastuzumab rezetecan and 50.0% with SOC. No patients discontinued treatment due to TRAEs. Treatment-related death was reported in two pts (2.3%) with trastuzumab rezetecan (septic shock and myelosuppression). Conclusions: Compared with SOC, trastuzumab rezetecan achieved prolonged PFS and improved ORR in chemotherapy-refractory HER2-positive advanced CRC, with a tolerable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT06199973 . Efficacy.   Trastuzumab rezetecan (N=86) SOC (N=44) Treatment effect (95% CI) 1-sided p value IRC-assessed PFS, mo 5.5 (4.8-6.7) 2.8 (2.2-4.2) HR, 0.33 (0.21 0.53) <0.0001 * Investigator-assessed PFS, mo 5.6 (5.0-6.8) 2.8 (1.5-4.1) HR, 0.31 (0.20-0.50) <0.0001 * OS, mo NR (14.6-NR) NR (12.5-NR) HR, 0.77 (0.35-1.73) 0.2651 * IRC-assessed ORR 35 (40.7; 30.2-51.8) 2 (4.5; 0.6-15.5) RD, 36.2 (24.1-48.2) <0.0001 † Investigator-assessed ORR 28 (32.6; 22.8-43.5) 2 (4.5; 0.6-15.5) RD, 28.0 (16.4-39.7) 0.0002 † IRC-assessed DoR, mo 4.4 (3.3-NR) 3.4 (2.7-NR) - - Investigator-assessed DoR, mo 5.8 (4.2-NR) 1.4 (NR-NR) - - Data are median (95% CI), or n (%; 95% CI), unless otherwise stated. * Stratified log-rank test. † Stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. NR, not reached; RD, rate difference.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 3505-3505
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

J

Jin Li

Y

Ying Yuan

T

Tianshu Liu

Department of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai

X

Xiuying Xiao

Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Y

YuDong Wang

F

Fengbin Zhang

The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China

Z

Zuoxing Niu

Y

Yanhong Deng

Q

Qiu Meng

West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

H

Hong Zong

Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China

Y

Yigui Chen

Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China

X

Xiang Gao

J

Jun Zhou

X

Xiaotong Li

Department of Chemistry and Organic and Carbon Electronics Laboratories (ORaCEL)

Y

Yifan Shen

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan

N

Ning Dou

Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China

C

Chuanpei Huang

Clinical Research & Development, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China