Phase 3 trial of adjuvant cemiplimab (cemi) versus placebo (pbo) for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC).
Abstract
6001 Background: Cemiplimab is standard of care for treatment of patients (pts) with advanced (metastatic/unresectable) CSCC. There is no approved systemic treatment for pts with CSCC at high risk of recurrence after definitive local therapy. Methods: C-POST, a double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study (NCT03969004), enrolled pts with local and/or regional CSCC, after surgery and post-operative radiation therapy, deemed to be at high risk of recurrence due to nodal (extracapsular extension with largest node ≥2 cm or ≥3 involved lymph nodes) and/or non-nodal (in-transit metastases, T4 lesion, perineural invasion, or locally recurrent tumor with ≥1 additional risk feature) criteria. Pts were randomized 1:1 to cemi 350mg or pbo every (Q) 3w for 12w, then cemi 700mg or pbo Q6W up to 36w (up to 48w total). Original protocol had cemi 350mg or pbo Q3W up to 48w. Crossover was allowed after disease recurrence. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included freedom from local-regional recurrence (FFLRR), freedom from distant recurrence (FFDR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Data cutoff for pre-specified interim analysis 1 (IA1; ~50% of final DFS events) was Oct 4, 2024. Per IDMC, the pre-specified threshold for DFS was crossed at IA1. Results: From Jun 2019 to Aug 2024, 415 pts (209/206 cemi/pbo) were randomized: median age, 71 yrs (range 33–95); 84% male; 83% head and neck primary; 58%/42% high-risk nodal/non-nodal categories. Median follow-up was 24 mos (range 2–64). DFS was superior with cemi vs pbo: hazard ratio (HR) 0.32 (95% CI 0.20–0.51); p<0.0001 (Table). Estimated 24-mo DFS was 87% (95% CI 80–92) for cemi and 64% (56–71) for pbo. Cemi improved FFLRR (HR 0.20; 95% CI 0.09–0.40) and FFDR (HR 0.35; 0.17–0.72) vs pbo. At IA1, OS HR for cemi vs pbo was 0.86 (95% CI 0.39–1.90). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 23.9% and 14.2% and discontinuations due to TEAEs occurred in 9.8% and 1.5% of pts receiving cemi and pbo, respectively. In exploratory analyses, DFS benefits were observed in pts with tumoral PD-L1 ≥1% (HR 0.28; 95%CI 0.15–0.52; n=309) and <1% (HR 0.32; 0.12–0.86; n=85). Conclusions: Cemiplimab is the first systemic therapy to demonstrate a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in disease recurrence as adjuvant therapy for high-risk CSCC, and has an acceptable safety profile in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT03969004 . Cemin=209 Pbon=206 Pts with DFS event, n (%) a 24 (12) 65 (32) Disease recurrence 18 (9) 61 (30) Death 6 (3) 4 (2) DFS, mos, median (95% CI) b NR (NE–NE) 49.4 (48.5–NE) HR (95% CI) c 0.32 (0.20–0.51) - 2-sided p-value d < 0.0001 - 24-mo DFS, % (95% CI) b 87.1 (80.3–91.6) 64.1 (55.9–71.1) 24-mo FFLRR, % (95% CI) b 94.6 (89.1–97.3) 76.7 (69.1–82.6) 24-mo FFDR, % (95% CI) b 94.3 (89.0–97.1) 83.8 (76.3–89.0) NE, not estimable; NR, not reached. a Censored pts: 185 cemi; 141 pbo. b Kaplan-Meier estimate. c Stratified Cox model. d Stratified log-rank test.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Danny Rischin
Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Sandro V. Porceddu
Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
Fiona Day
Department of Medical Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW, Australia
Daniel Brungs
Medical Oncology, Cancer Care Wollongong and Graduate School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
Hayden Robert Christie
Cancer Care Centre Hervey Bay, Queensland, Australia
James Estes Jackson
Radiation Oncology Centers, Gold Coast, Australia
Brian N. Stein
Adelaide Cancer Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Yungpo Su
Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Nebraska Cancer Specialists, Omaha, NE
Gerard Adams
Radiation Oncology, Genesis Care, Bundaberg, QLD, Australia
Samantha Bowyer
Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia
Zulfiquer Ali Otty
Townsville Cancer Centre, Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, QLD, Australia
Naoya Yamazaki
National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo
Paolo Bossi
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan
Amarnath Challapalli
Bristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
Rahul Ladwa
Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
Axel Hauschild
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Kiel, Germany
Frank A. Seebach
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY
Suk-Young Yoo
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY
Priscila Hermont Goncalves
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY
Matthew G. Fury
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY