Phase-3 study of vamotinib (PF-114) versus high-dose imatinib

A Anna Turkina O Olga Vinogradova (2Botkin Hospital, Oncology, Moscow, Russian Federation) N Nuriya Kalimulina (3UZI Clinic 4D, Oncology, Pyatigorsk, Russian Federation) T Tatyana Shelekhova (4Saratov State Medical Center, Oncology, Saratov, Russian Federation) I Igor Davydkin (5Samara State Medical University, Oncology, Samara, Russian Federation) B Bulat Bakirov (6Bashkir State Medical University, Oncology, Ufa, Russian Federation) T Tatiana Pospelova (7Novosibirsk State Medical University, Oncology, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation) E Elza Lomaia (8Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation) J Jitendra Pehalajani (9Marudhar Hospital, Oncology, Jaipur, India) V Vishvdeep Khushoo (10All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Oncology, Nagpur, India) S Shashikant Apte R Robert Gale (3Centre for Haematology, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK, London, United Kingdom) G Ghermes Chilov (13Fusion Pharma, Moscow, Russian Federation)

Abstract

Abstract Background Vamotinib (PF-114), an oral tyrosine kinase-inhibitor (TKI) is active against wild-type and BCR::ABL1 variants. Whether it is safer and more effective compared with high-dose imatinib in people with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) failing conventional dose imatinib is unknown. Method Multi-centre open-label phase-3 trial with endpoints of safety and 1-year major molecular response (MMR). Other endpoints are rates of BCR::ABL1IS < 1% (MR2), MR4 and MR4.5. Subjects with imatinib-resistant BCR::ABL1 variantswere excluded. Results 180 subject (vamotinib, 300 mg; N = 89; imatinib; 800 mg; N = 91) were enrolled. 117 were men. Median age was 44 years (Range 18-75 years). Median CML duration pre-study was 4 years (Range, < 1-24 years). 65 subjects (73%) in the vamotinib cohort and 65 (71%) in the imatinib cohort had pre-study BCR::ABL1 ≥ 10%. Rate of achieving 1-year MMR with vamotinib was 47% compared with imatinib, 12% ( p < 0.001). Rates of other endpoints were also higher with vamotinib. There were no significant differences frequency of adverse events (AEs). Skin toxicity was the most common AE for vamotinib. Conclusion Vamotinib, 300 mg, is as safe as imatinib, 800 mg, but more effective in achieving 1-year MMR. The study is ongoing.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 7290-7290
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (13)

A

Anna Turkina

O

Olga Vinogradova

2Botkin Hospital, Oncology, Moscow, Russian Federation

N

Nuriya Kalimulina

3UZI Clinic 4D, Oncology, Pyatigorsk, Russian Federation

T

Tatyana Shelekhova

4Saratov State Medical Center, Oncology, Saratov, Russian Federation

I

Igor Davydkin

5Samara State Medical University, Oncology, Samara, Russian Federation

B

Bulat Bakirov

6Bashkir State Medical University, Oncology, Ufa, Russian Federation

T

Tatiana Pospelova

7Novosibirsk State Medical University, Oncology, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

E

Elza Lomaia

8Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation

J

Jitendra Pehalajani

9Marudhar Hospital, Oncology, Jaipur, India

V

Vishvdeep Khushoo

10All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Oncology, Nagpur, India

S

Shashikant Apte

R

Robert Gale

3Centre for Haematology, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK, London, United Kingdom

G

Ghermes Chilov

13Fusion Pharma, Moscow, Russian Federation