Phase 2/3 trial of zilovertamab vedotin plus standard of care in relapsed/ refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Updated analysis of waveline-003
Abstract
Abstract Background: Despite progress in the treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL),outcomes for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL remain poor. The receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 1 (ROR-1) is a cell-surface protein overexpressed in most lymphoid cancers including DLBCL (Daneshmanesh et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2022). Zilovertamab vedotin (ZV) is a novel ROR1-targeting antibody-drug conjugate that has shown promising efficacy in patients with DLBCL (Norasetthada et al. 2024). The phase 2/3 waveLINE-003 trial (NCT05139017) evaluated the safety and efficacy of ZV plus rituximab and gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (R-GemOx) in participants with R/R DLBCL. We previously reported results for the dose confirmation phase of waveLINE-003 with 40 participants and 9.8 months of follow up where the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was determined to be ZV 1.75 mg/kg. In participants receiving ZV 1.75 mg/kg plus R-GemOx, the objective response rate (ORR) was 56% (8 CR, 1 PR) with median duration of response (DOR) of 8.7 months, and median overall survival (OS) not reached. We present an updated analysis of the waveLINE-003 dose confirmation phase with an additional 9 months of follow up. Methods Eligible participants were aged ≥18 years with confirmed R/R DLBCL after ≥1 lines of therapy who were ineligible for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T), autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT), or had failed such therapies. In the dose confirmation phase, eligible participants received ZV (1.5, 1.75, or 2.0 mg/kg) plus R-GemOx Q3W for ≥6 cycles. Primary endpoints were safety and RP2D. Tertiary/exploratory endpoints included ORR and DOR per Lugano 2014 response criteria by investigator, and OS. Results At data cut-off (May 5, 2025), the median follow-up was 18.9 months with 40 participants enrolled to receive ZV 1.5 mg/kg (n=17), 1.75 mg/kg (n=16), or 2.0 mg/kg (n=7) plus R-GemOx. A total of 22 (55%) participants were ≥65 years old, and 9 (23%) relapsed >12 months after completing first-line treatment. The median number of prior therapies was 2.0 with 7 (18%) pts receiving prior CAR-T, 7 (18%) receiving prior ASCT, and 2 (5%) received prior polatuzumab vedotin. Participants with germinal center B-cell (GCB) DLBCL were 18 (45%), with non-GCB were 19 (48%), and unknown 3 (8%). Treatment-related adverse events (AE) were reported in 39 (98%) participants; the most common being diarrhea (n=18 [45%]), nausea (n=15 [38%]), neutropenia (n=12 [30%]), neutrophil count decreased (n=12 [30%]), anemia (n=11 [28%]), and platelet count decrease (n=11 [28%]). Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs were reported in 27 (68%) participants, the most common being neutropenia (n=11 [28%]), neutrophil count decreased (n=9 [23%]), platelet count decreased (n=9 [23%]), and anemia (n=8 [20%]). One treatment-related death due to sepsis occurred in the 2.0 mg/kg dose cohort. The ORR was 29.4% (4 CR, 1 PR [ZV 1.5 mg/kg]), 56.3% (8 CR, 1 PR [ZV 1.75 mg/kg]), and 42.9% (2 CR, 1 PR [ZV 2.0 mg/kg]), with median DOR of 14.4 months, 8.7 months and 10.6 months, respectively. The median OS was 11.5 months (ZV 1.5 mg/kg), 36.8 months (ZV 1.75 mg/kg), and 7.4 months (ZV 2.0 mg/kg), with 12-month OS rate of 43.6%, 65.8%, and 42.9%, respectively. Treatment responses were observed among both participants with GCB and non-GCB DLBCL. Conclusions After approximately 19 months of follow-up, ZV plus R-GemOX continues to demonstrate promising efficacy and acceptable safety in R/R DLBCL at the RP2D of ZV of 1.75 mg/kg plus R-GemOx. No new safety concerns were reported. The efficacy expansion phase of this trial randomizing participants to ZV plus R-GemOx versus R-GemOx is currently ongoing.
Article Details
Authors (13)
Philippe Armand
4Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Seung Tae Lee
26Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Wojciech Jurczak
Don Stevens
3Norton Cancer Institute, Louisville, United States
Sylvain Choquet
18AP-HP – Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
Hervé Ghesquieres
Hopital Lyon Sud, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Pierre-Benite, France
Lalita Norasetthada
Antonio Pinto
15Department of Hematology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico “Fondazione G Pascale”, Naples, Italy
Güray Saydam
9Ege University Medical Faculty Hospital, Department of Internal Diseases, Division of Hematology, Izmir, Türkiye
Heng Zhou
National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Precision and Intelligent Chemistry
Nishitha Reddy
10Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, United States
Rushdia Yusuf
16Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, United States
Muhit Ozcan
14Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye