Phase 2 trial of zilovertamab vedotin in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone plus rituximab in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Updated analysis of waveline-007
Abstract
Abstract Background: Despite progress made with combination therapies that include cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone plus rituximab (R-CHP) and polatuzomab vedotin, outcomes for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) leave room for improvement. The receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 1 (ROR-1) is a cell-surface protein overexpressed in most lymphoid cancers including DLBCL (Daneshmanesh et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2022). Zilovertamab vedotin (ZV) is a novel ROR1-targeting antibody-drug conjugate that has shown promising efficacy in patients with DLBCL (Norasetthada et al. 2024). The phase 2 waveLINE-007 trial (NCT05406401) evaluated the safety and efficacy of ZV plus R-CHP in participants with untreated DLBCL. We previously reported results of waveLINE-007 with 36 participants and 10 months of follow up where the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was determined to be ZV 1.75 mg/kg. All 15 (100%) participants receiving ZV 1.75 mg/kg plus R-CHP achieved complete response (CR) at end-of-treatment with an objective response rate (ORR) of 100% and median duration of response (DOR) not reached. We present an updated analysis of the waveLINE-007 trial with an additional 16 months of follow-up. Methods: Eligible participants were aged ≥18 years with DLBCL confirmed by positron emission tomography by BICR per Lugano criteria, no prior treatment for DLBCL, and ECOG performance score 0-1 to receive ZV (1.75, 2.0, 2.25 mg/kg) plus R-CHP Q3W for 6 or 8 cycles. Primary endpoints were safety, RP2D, and CR per Lugano 2014 response criteria by investigator. Secondary endpoints were ORR and DOR per Lugano criteria by investigator. Tertiary/Exploratory endpoints included overall survival (OS). Results: At data cut-off (May 6, 2025), the median follow-up was 26.6 months with 36 participants enrolled to receive ZV 1.75 mg/kg (n=15), 2.0 mg/kg (n=15), or 2.25 mg/kg (n=6) plus R-CHP. Overall, 34 (94%) participants completed the trial, and 2 (6%) discontinued treatment due to physician decision (ZV 2.0 mg/kg, n=1; ZV 2.25 mg/kg, n=1). Overall, 21 (58%) participants were female, 17 (47%) were ≥65 years old, 21 (58%) had ECOG performance score of 1, 18 (50%) had Ann Arbor stage IV disease, and 3 (8%) had a NCCN International Prognostic Index of high risk. Participants with germinal center B-cell (GCB) DLBCL were 15 (42%), with non-GCB were 16 (44%), and unknown 5 (14%). Treatment-related adverse events (AE) were reported in all 36 (100%) participants, the most common being neutropenia (n=15 [42%]), nausea (n=10 [28%]), anemia (n=9 [25%]), diarrhea (n=7 [19%]), peripheral sensory neuropathy (n=7 [19%]), and neutrophil count decreased (n=6 [17%]). Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs were reported in 21 (58%) participants, the most common being neutropenia (n=13 [36%]), neutrophil count decreased (n=6 [17%]), and febrile neutropenia (n=5 [14%]). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Complete response was achieved in all 15 (100%) participants receiving ZV 1.75 mg/kg, 14 (93%) participants receiving ZV 2.0 mg/kg, and all 6 (100%) participants receiving ZV 2.25 mg/kg, for an overall CR rate of 97.2% (95% CI, 86-100). The ORR was 100%, 93%, and 100% for participants receiving ZV 1.75 mg/kg, 2.0 mg/kg, and 2.25 mg/kg, respectively. The median duration of CR was not reached (NR) for all participants, with 24-month CR rate of 84%. All participants with GCB (n=5) and non-GCB (n=7) DLBCL receiving ZV 1.75 mg/kg achieved complete response. An estimated 84% of participants overall had response duration ≥24 months. The 24-month PFS and OS rates were 84% and 94%, respectively, for all participants. For participants receiving ZV 1.75 mg/kg, the 24-month PFS and OS rates were 100% and 100%, respectively, for those with GCB DLBCL, and 83.3% and 100%, for those with non-GCB DLBCL. Conclusions: After approximately 27 months of follow-up, ZV plus R-CHP continues to demonstrate robust efficacy and acceptable safety as front-line treatment for participants with DLBCL regardless of cell of origin. No new safety concerns were reported.
Article Details
Authors (19)
Marco Ladetto
1University of Eastern Piedmont, Department of Translational Medicine, Novara, Italy
David Lavie
2Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
Tae Min Kim
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Eva Gonzalez Barca
12Institut Català d'Oncologia-Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
Ewa Paszkiewicz-Kozik
Stefan Hohaus
14Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
Caterina Patti
21“Villa Sofia – Cervello” Hospital, Palermo, Italy
Jan Zaucha
21Medical University of Gdańsk and University Clinical Center, Gdansk, Poland
Omur Gokmen Sevindik
Department of Hematology, Istanbul Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
Yulia Volchek
1Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
Raúl Córdoba
Guillermo Rodríguez Garcia
12Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Hematology, Seville, Spain
Sebastian Giebel
Benedetta Puccini
10Department of Haematology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Tadeusz Robak
36Department of Hematology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
Siruo Wang
16Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, United States
Puja Patel
16Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, United States
Rushdia Yusuf
16Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, United States
Muhit Ozcan
14Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye