Phase 2 trial of cladribine plus immediate rituximab for 1st-line treatment of hairy cell leukemia – long term follow-up of original and additional patient cohorts

R Robert Kreitman (1National Institutes of Health, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, NIH, Bethesda, United States) H Hao-Wei Wang D Dana Delgado Colon (2National Institutes of Health, Laboratory of Pathology, NCI, Bethesda, United States) E Evgeny Arons (3Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Centers for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) H Hong Zhou (Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Agri-Seeds, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University) M Mark Raffeld (Department of Pathology, NCI, Bethesda, MD) L Liqiang Xi (2Laboratory of Pathology, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) J Julie Feurtado (4Office of Research Nursing, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) L Lacey James (1National Institutes of Health, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, NIH, Bethesda, United States) K Katherine Calvo (4National Institutes of Health, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, Bethesda, United States) I Irina Maric (5Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) C Constance Yuan (2Laboratory of Pathology, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD)

Abstract

Abstract Background: Hairy cell leukemia is a B-cell malignancy presenting with cytopenias and splenomegaly. It responds well to purine analogs cladribine (CDA) and pentostatin, but minimal residual disease (MRD) and relapses are common. Randomized 1st line data showed higher MRD-free CR rate using cladribine with (CDAR) vs without (CDA) concurrent rituximab (97% vs 24% at 6 months, 94% vs 32% long term, both p<0.0001). Published results from rituximab started 4 weeks after cladribine (CDA+R) include MRD-free CR rate 83/107 (78%) at 3-4 months. To validate the 94% MRD-free CR rate after CDAR, 25 additional patients received CDAR, and follow-up from the 34 randomized patients after CDAR updated. Reportedly, rituximab increases cell sensitivity to cladribine, resulting in ex vivo synergy; this would be possible after CDAR but not after CDA+R due to cladribine's short half-life. Patients and Methods Patients (N=25) with untreated HCL received CDAR, cladribine 0.15 mg/kg IV days 1-5 with 8 weekly doses of rituximab 375 mg/m2 begun day 1. Rituximab was given before cladribine on day 1 to compare to the 34 randomized CDAR patients who received cladribine before rituximab on day 1. MRD was assessed by blood and bone marrow aspirate (BMA) flow cytometry (FC, sensitivity 0.002% of cells) and bone marrow biopsy immunohistochemistry (IHC). As in the published CDAR trial, patients received one 8-week course of delayed rituximab if blood MRD was detected by FC >6 months after day 1. After beginning CDAR, blood was evaluated every 3 months for 1 year, semiannually until 2.5 years, then annually. Bone marrow was evaluated at 1, 6, 18 and 30 months, then every 2 years indefinitely. Patients treated with CDAR on the earlier randomized trial (N=34) were followed similarly. Results: Of 25 non-randomized patients after CDAR, 25/25 (100%) achieved CR, and 21/25 (86%) achieved MRD-free CR by 6 months. One patient achieved MRD-free CR by 1.5-years and another by 4.5-years, both repeatedly redemonstrating MRD-free CR thereafter. At 7.3-11.1 (median 9.0) years of follow-up, 23/25 (92%) patients achieved and remained in MRD-free CR, with median MRD-free survival of 9.0 years. One of 2 patients with MRD received delayed rituximab for blood MRD, which resolved blood but not BMA MRD for 3.5 years. No new safety signals were seen; 4/25 (16%) patients received prophylactic platelet transfusion on day 1-2 due to grade 4 thrombocytopenia. This was due to rituximab unrelated to cladribine, and no significant bleeding occurred. The order of rituximab and cladribine on day 1 had no impact on efficacy or toxicity. Regarding the 34-patient CDAR randomized cohort, 5.0-15.9 (median 13.4) year follow-up is now available. Three of 34 patients died of causes unrelated to HCL or CDAR, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining 28 patients continue to be followed, including bone marrow studies for MRD. As previously reported, the 6-month MRD-free CR rate was 97%, and the 1 patient who relapsed at 1.5 years had >20 years of interferon treatment but was eligible since purine analog naïve. However, no other patients have relapsed from MRD-free CR, and all remaining 32 (94%) patients had MRD-free CR reconfirmed by the last bone marrow assessment. Interestingly, 3 patients had transient MRD; 1 patient became MRD+ at 10.5 years but negative at 12.5 and 14.5 years; 1 became MRD+ at 4.5 years but negative at 6.5, 8.5, 10.5, and 12.5 years; 1 became MRD+ at 2.5 years but negative at 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, and 12.5 years. Of the 59 total patients after CDAR, with 5.0-15.9 (median 11.5) years of follow-up, 55/59 (93%) patients remain MRD-free at the most recent assessment. Conclusion: First-line CDAR is highly effective for HCL, achieving MRD-free CR in 54/59 (92%) total patients at 6 months and 55/59 (93%) long term. The high MRD-free CR rate may be due to synergy of cladribine and rituximab starting the same day. Transient appearance of MRD which later resolved may be related to immune destruction. Thrombocytopenia on day 1-2 was a minor issue, and the randomized trial reported higher platelet (and neutrophil) counts after CDAR vs CDA probably due to more rapid bone marrow clearing. To evaluate the clinical importance of remaining MRD-free, patients after CDAR are being compared to patients in MRD+ CR after 1st line CDA or CDA+R to determine if there is a difference in progression free survival or time to next treatment.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 3609-3609
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (12)

R

Robert Kreitman

1National Institutes of Health, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, NIH, Bethesda, United States

H

Hao-Wei Wang

D

Dana Delgado Colon

2National Institutes of Health, Laboratory of Pathology, NCI, Bethesda, United States

E

Evgeny Arons

3Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Centers for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

H

Hong Zhou

Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Agri-Seeds, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

M

Mark Raffeld

Department of Pathology, NCI, Bethesda, MD

L

Liqiang Xi

2Laboratory of Pathology, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

J

Julie Feurtado

4Office of Research Nursing, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

L

Lacey James

1National Institutes of Health, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, NIH, Bethesda, United States

K

Katherine Calvo

4National Institutes of Health, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, Bethesda, United States

I

Irina Maric

5Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

C

Constance Yuan

2Laboratory of Pathology, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD