Phase 2 study of cevostamab consolidation following BCMA CAR T cell therapy: preliminary safety, efficacy, and correlative data from the “STEM” (Sequential T Cell-Engagement for Myeloma) trial
Abstract
Abstract Background: BCMA-targeted CAR T cells have unprecedented activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), but the majority of patients (pts) relapse. Mechanisms of resistance include lack of persistence or poor function of CAR T cells, as well as BCMA-low or -negative residual tumor cells. FcRH5 is a MM antigen with expression independent of BCMA. Cevostamab (cevo) is an FcRH5-targeted, T cell-engaging bispecific antibody with demonstrated activity in RRMM, including in patients with prior BCMA-directed therapies (Richter et al, ASH 2024, #1021). We hypothesized that fixed-duration cevo following BCMA-targeted CAR T cells would be feasible, tolerable and improve sustained minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response (CR) rates, potentially leading to more durable responses. Methods: This is an ongoing single-institution, investigator-initiated study (NCT05801939), with funding from Genentech/Roche. RRMM pts who received standard of care CAR T cells (ide-cel or cilta-cel) 8-10 weeks prior to enrollment, with stable disease or better, receive cevo at a step-up dose of 3.6 mg intravenously (IV) on Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1), followed by full target dose starting on C1D8, then every 3 weeks for total of 8 cycles. If pts are in MRD-negative CR after 8 cycles (Adaptive Clonoseq assay, at 10-5 sensitivity), they stop therapy and are observed. If not, they get another 8 cycles of cevo, and then are observed. Primary endpoint is frequency of MRD-negative CR at 12 months post-CAR T cell therapy. All pts receive IVIG. Results: Twenty-seven pts (20M and 7F; median age 64 (33-80); 21 White, 6 Black) have enrolled. Twenty (74%) had high risk cytogenetics (t(4;14), t(14;16), -17p, -1p, or +1q), with 11 (41%) having ≥2 high risk features; 5 (19%) had extramedullary disease. Median number of prior lines was 4 (2-10), with 74% triple-class refractory, 11% prior BCMA therapy, and 11% prior talquetamab. Twenty-five (93%) received cilta-cel and 2 (7%) ide-cel. Reponses at enrollment (post-CAR T cells) were 63% CR/sCR, 15% VGPR, 18% PR, 4% SD; 25 of 27 pts were evaluable for MRD, with 100% MRD-negative at 10-5. During a safety run-in, 3 pts started cevo 8-10 weeks post-CAR T cells, at a target dose of 160 mg, and during C1 all had grade (G) 1 or 2 allergic-type symptoms (rash, arthralgias, cough and/or bronchospasm) which resolved with anti-histamines and topical or systemic steroids. For this reason, the study was modified to start cevo 10-12 weeks post-CAR T cells and change target dose to 132 mg. As of 6/27/25 data cut-off, no dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) have occurred. CRS occurred in 4 (15%) pts (3 G1, 1 G2) and infusion reactions in 19% (all G1/2); no ICANS or HLH was seen. Median number of cycles is 8, and 6 (22%) pts have had dose reductions from 132 to 90mg. Common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE's), regardless of attribution, include lymphopenia (74%, G3/4 67%), neutropenia (74%, G3/4 44%), cough (59%, G3/4 0%), rash 44% (G3/4 0%), thrombocytopenia 41% (G3/4 22%), upper respiratory infection 37% (G3/4 0%), nasal congestion 33% (G3/4 0%), and AST increase 33% (G3/4 7%). Infections were seen in 52% (G3/4 in 15%). Notable immune-related AE's include colitis G1, neuropathy with ataxia G3, ITP G4 (n=2, 1 with prior history), autoimmune hepatitis G1) – all resolved. So far, 22 pts are response-evaluable after 8 cycles, with 81% in stringent CR, 9% in VGPR, 5% in SD; 21/22 (95%) were MRD-negative at 10-5, and 20/22 (91%) at 10-6 (1 pt had PD after C4, counted as MRD+). Only 3 pts to date have required the 2nd 8 cycles of cevo. Fourteen pts are evaluable at 1 year post-CAR T cells, with 93% in MRD-negative (at 10-5) sCR, 79% at 10-6. With median follow-up of 12 months (range 3-25) post-CAR T cells, estimated 12-month PFS and OS are both 95%. Preliminary correlative analyses demonstrate detectable CAR+ T cells (by both qPCR and flow) at enrollment in 2 of 5 pts tested to date; both had modest re-expansion of CAR T cells during C1 of cevo, with persistence out to 1 year.Conclusions: To date, cevostamab consolidation starting 10-12 weeks post-CAR T cell infusion at 3.6mg single step-up and 132mg q3wk target dose appears feasible and well-tolerated in heavily-pretreated RRMM, with low rates of non-hematologic G3/4 TEAE's, including infections. Preliminary efficacy appears promising, with over 90% showing sustained MRD-negative CR at 1 year. Analyses and follow-up are ongoing.
Article Details
Authors (20)
Adam Cohen
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Sandra Susanibar-Adaniya
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Philadelphia, United States
Alfred Garfall
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Philadelphia, United States
Dan Vogl
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Philadelphia, United States
Shivani Kapur
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Philadelphia, United States
Adam Waxman
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Danielle Zubka
1University of Pennsylvania, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Philadelphia, United States
Wei-Ting Hwang
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Cynthia Diaczynsky
1University of Pennsylvania, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Philadelphia, United States
Julia Han Noll
Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Matthew Ho
Luca Paruzzo
Bing Yi
3University of Pennsylvania, Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Philadelphia, United States
Rong Xu
Elina Thai
3University of Pennsylvania, Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Philadelphia, United States
Vanessa Gonzalez
Department of Molecular Biology
Peter Michener
Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Marco Ruella
Joseph Fraietta
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Edward Stadtmauer
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Philadelphia, United States