Phase 1/2 study of nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy in bordeline resectable, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (LAPTOP).

I Inna Markovna Chen (Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark) M Mario Presti (National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark) C Carsten Palnaes Hansen (Department of Digestive Diseases, Transplantation and General Surgery, Copenhagen Uni-versity Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark) S Susann Theile (Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark) M Mette Van Overeem Felter (Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark) K Kasper Madsen T Torben Lorentzen Y Yousef Jesper Wirenfeldt Nielsen (Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark) G Gina Juel Al-Farra (Department of Radiology, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark) M Marco Donia I Inge Marie Svane J Julia S. Johansen D Dorte Nielsen

Abstract

4168 Background: This phase 1/2 study (NCT04247165) evaluated the safety and efficacy of combining nivolumab, ipilimumab, gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with borderline resectable (BRPC), locally advanced (LAPC), or metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). Methods: Treatment-naïve patients with BRPC, LAPC or mPC received 28-day cycles of nivolumab (3 mg/kg), ipilimumab (1 mg/kg single dose), and gemcitabine (800 mg/m 2 ) with nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, and 15). Starting in cycle 3, patients underwent MRI or CT-guided adaptive SBRT (8 Gy x 3 fractions) targeting the primary pancreatic tumor. Primary endpoint: safety, defined by the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) leading to discontinuation, monitored via a Bayesian stopping rule for rates exceeding 30%. Secondary endpoints: OS, PFS, ORR, DCR, DOR, and resection rate. Exploratory endpoint: immunological changes. Results: A total of 55 patients received at least one treatment (BRPC: n=1, LAPC: n=23, mPC: n=31), with a median follow-up of 27.6 months (IQR 26.3-34.4) calculated via reverse Kaplan-Meier. Grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 70.8% of BRPC/LAPC and 71.0% of mPC patients. No grade 5 TRAEs were observed. Treatment discontinuation due to TRAEs occurred in 20.8% (BRPC/LAPC) and 9.7% (mPC). Median OS: 23.0 months (95% CI: 11.4–NR) for BRPC/LAPC and 11.2 months (6.8–15.8) for mPC. Median PFS: 14.9 months (8.7–24.2) for BRPC/LAPC and 6.1 months (3.8–8.4) for mPC. ORR: 33.3% (15.6–55.3) for BRPC/LAPC and 19.4% (7.5–37.4) for mPC. DCR: 75.0% (53.3–90.2) for BRPC/LAPC and 61.3% (42.2–78.2) for mPC. Median DOR: 8.9 months (4.0–12.7). Nine (37.5%) BRPC/LAPC patients and three (9.7%) mPC patients underwent resection. Preliminary analyses revealed treatment-induced T-cell activation, particularly after SBRT, with upregulation of activation and stemness markers in patients with durable clinical benefit. Conversely, an increase in senescence markers was observed in the rest of the cohort. Conclusions: The combination of nivolumab, ipilimumab, gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and adaptive SBRT demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and efficacy supporting further investigation in BRPC, LAPC, and mPC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04247165 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 4168-4168
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (13)

I

Inna Markovna Chen

Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark

M

Mario Presti

National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark

C

Carsten Palnaes Hansen

Department of Digestive Diseases, Transplantation and General Surgery, Copenhagen Uni-versity Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

S

Susann Theile

Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark

M

Mette Van Overeem Felter

Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark

K

Kasper Madsen

T

Torben Lorentzen

Y

Yousef Jesper Wirenfeldt Nielsen

Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark

G

Gina Juel Al-Farra

Department of Radiology, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark

M

Marco Donia

I

Inge Marie Svane

J

Julia S. Johansen

D

Dorte Nielsen