Phase 1/2 studies of DZD8586 in CLL/SLL patients after covalent or non-covalent BTK inhibitors and BTK degraders.
Abstract
7010 Background: New therapies are needed for patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) CLL/SLL following covalent and/or non-covalent BTK inhibitors. While early clinical data showed encouraging anti-tumor activities from BTK degraders in these patients, resistance mutations to both BTK inhibitors and degraders have already been reported. In addition, concerns with emerging clinical safety signals from these degraders may limit their longer-term clinical use. DZD8586 is a rationally designed LYN/BTK dual inhibitor with high selectivity against other TEC family members. Here we report results from ongoing phase 1/2 clinical studies of DZD8586 in r/r CLL/SLL patients with prior treatment of covalent and/or non-covalent BTK inhibitors as well as BTK degraders. Methods: The data from two clinical studies, TAI-SHAN5 (NCT05824585) and TAI-SHAN8 (NCT06539182, CTR20240120), were pooled for the safety and efficacy analysis in patients with CLL/SLL. Modulation of PD biomarkers was evaluated at doses tested. Tumor response was assessed by investigators per iwCLL 2018 or Lugano 2014 criteria as appropriate. Results: As of January 3, 2025, a total of 40 patients with r/r CLL/SLL have been enrolled and received DZD8586 at doses ranging from 25 mg to 100 mg once daily (QD). The median age was 64.5 years, 62.5% were male, and 60% had ECOG score of 1 or 2. A total of 30 patients were evaluable for efficacy analysis. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-8). Most common prior CLL/SLL therapies included BTK inhibitor (76.7%), and Bcl-2 inhibitor (43.3%). Patients previously treated by non-covalent BTK inhibitor (13.3%) and BTK degrader (13.3%) were also reported. Across all dose levels, 15 out of 30 patients achieved tumor response, with objective response rate (ORR) of 50%. At the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 50 mg QD, 9 out of 14 patients achieved tumor response, with ORR of 64.3%. Efficacy was observed in patients with prior BTK inhibitor treatment (ORR 52.2%), and Bcl-2 inhibitor treatment (ORR 46.2%). Seventy five percent patients who received prior BTK degrader treatment achieved partial response. As of the data cut-off date, the longest responder was on therapy for 12.1 months. Deepening response was observed with longer treatment time. DZD8586 was well tolerated across the doses investigated. At the RP2D, the most common ≥grade 3 TEAEs were neutropenia (15%) and pneumonia (10%). No major bleeding or atrial fibrillation was reported. No grade 4/5 AEs reported. Conclusions: DZD8586 showed encouraging anti-tumor activity with a well tolerated and manageable safety profile in heavily pre-treated CLL/SLL patients, including patients with prior covalent BTKi, non-covalent BTKi, BTK degrader and Bcl-2 inhibitor treatment. PK/PD results confirmed dose/exposure-dependent pathway inhibition by DZD8586. The updated data will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT06539182 , NCT05824585 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Jianyong Li
Department of Pathogenic Biology, Army Medical University
Ke-Shu Zhou
Department of Hematology, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Huayuan Zhu
6The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China
Sujun Gao
2The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
Tingyu Wang
Jian-Qing Mi
Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Centre for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Research Unit of Hematologic Malignancies Genomics and Translational Research of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Xutao Guo
1Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital,Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
Kaiyang Ding
2Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
Guohui Cui
10Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Wei Yang
Rui Huang
School of Chemistry
Lihua Qiu
Geoffrey Chong
7Olivia Newton-John Cancer Centre, Heidelberg, Australia
Mark Blaine Geyer
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Wuhan Hui
18Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Yun Zhuang
12Wu Xi People's Hospital, Wuxi, China
Hongmei Jing
Ying Xiang
9Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
Ke Fang
Chan Cheah
20Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia