Phase 1/2 studies of DZD8586 in CLL/SLL patients after COVALENT and non-COVALENT BTK inhibitors and BTK degraders – extended follow-up report
Abstract
Abstract Background Birelentinib (DZD8586) is a LYN/BTK dual inhibitor designed to block both BTK-dependent and BTK-independent BCR signalling. In TAI-SHAN5 (NCT05824585) and TAI-SHAN8 (NCT06539182, CTR20240120) studies, patients who failed front line BTKi and/or BCL2i showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 84.2%. Similar responses were observed in patients with prior treatment of covalent BTKi, non-covalent BTKi as well as BTK degraders, with BTK C481X or “kinase-impaired” mutations (ASCO 2025). Here we report follow-up results of these studies. Methods The data from TAI-SHAN5 and TAI-SHAN8 studies were pooled for the efficacy and safety analysis. Tumor response was assessed by investigators per iwCLL 2018 or Lugano 2014 criteria, as appropriate. All enrolled patients were included in safety analysis, and those patients enrolled by January 2025 were included in efficacy analysis to assess efficacy with long-term follow-up. Results As of July 7, 2025, a total of 65 patients with r/r CLL/SLL have been enrolled and received DZD8586 at doses ranging from 25 mg to 100 mg once daily (QD). At the recommended phase 3 dose (RP3D), 50 mg QD, 44 patients were enrolled. The median age was 62.5 years, 68% were male, and 64% had ECOG score of 1 or 2. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-5). Del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation was detected in 37% of the patients. Prior therapies included BTK inhibitor (71%, including 7% treated with non-covalent BTK inhibitor and 5% treated with BTK degrader), BCL-2 inhibitor (23%), and chemoimmunotherapy (41%). BTK mutations were detected in 55% of patients, including kinase proficient BTK mutation (55%) and kinase impaired BTK mutation (32%). In the efficacy analysis set at RP3D (N=19), 16 out of 19 patients achieved tumor response, with overall response rate (ORR) of 84.2%. Tumor response was observed in patients who received prior treatment with BTK inhibitors (ORR 82.4%, including non-covalent BTK inhibitors [2/2, ORR 100%]), Bcl-2 inhibitor (5/6, ORR 83%), and BTK degrader (1/2, ORR 50%). With median follow-up of 8.3 months, the estimated 12-month PFS rate was 61.9%. As of data cut-off date, the longest responder was on therapy for 12.1 months. DZD8586 was well tolerated across the doses investigated. No new safety signals were identified. At the RP3D, the most common ≥grade 3 drug-related TEAEs were neutropenia (22.7%). No febrile neutropenia was reported. No major bleeding or atrial fibrillation was reported. Nine percent of the patients had drug-related TEAEs leading to dose reduction. Only one patient discontinued treatment due to drug-related TEAE (cough). No drug-related TEAE related death was reported. Conclusion DZD8586 showed encouraging anti-tumor activity with well tolerated and manageable safety profile in heavily pre-treated CLL/SLL patients, including patients with prior covalent BTKi, non-covalent BTKi, BTK degrader, and Bcl-2 inhibitor treatment. Durable tumor response was observed. The updated data will be presented at the meeting.
Article Details
Authors (25)
Keshu Zhou
3the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Tingyu Wang
Wei Yang
Jian-Qing Mi
Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Centre for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Research Unit of Hematologic Malignancies Genomics and Translational Research of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Sujun Gao
2The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
Huayuan Zhu
6The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China
Xutao Guo
1Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital,Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
Kaiyang Ding
2Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
Ying Xiang
9Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
Huili Cai
10Yichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang, China
Guohui Cui
10Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Yun Zhuang
12Wu Xi People's Hospital, Wuxi, China
Hongmei Jing
Liping Su
2Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/ Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
Rui Huang
School of Chemistry
Lihua Qiu
Mark Geyer
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Wuhan Hui
18Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Geoffrey Chong
7Olivia Newton-John Cancer Centre, Heidelberg, Australia
Meifang Zheng
State Key Laboratory of Chemistry for NBC Hazards Protection, College of Chemistry
Yi Wang
Ying Li
Ke Fang
Chan Cheah
20Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia
Jianyong Li
Department of Pathogenic Biology, Army Medical University