Phase 1 study of HMPL-306, an inhibitor of mutant IDH1/IDH2 (mIDH1/2), in western patients (pts) with advanced mIDH solid tumor, including glioma.
Abstract
2013 Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 or IDH2 mutations or co-mutations have been associated with various tumors, including glioma. HMPL-306 (’306) is a novel, small-molecule, orally available, highly selective, and potent dual inhibitor of both mIDH1 and mIDH2. This is a phase 1 study of ’306 in pts with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with mIDH. Here, we report the results of the dose escalation stage. Methods: Pts with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with any mIDH were enrolled to receive ’306 once daily (QD) for 28-day cycles. The mTPI-2 design was used for dose escalation, having explored in 8 successive cohorts (50-400 mg). The study aims to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), evaluate safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetics/ pharmacodynamics (PK/PD). Results: As of Aug 9, 2024, 42 pts were administered ’306 across 8 doses (n = 3, 3, 5, 12, 6, 4, 4, 5 in 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400 mg QD cohorts, respectively), with 17 (40.5%) lower-grade glioma (LGG, grade 2 and grade 3 glioma) pts, 3 (7.1%) grade 4 glioma pts and 22 (52.4%) non glioma pts. The median age was 55 years, and 25 (59.5%) pts were male. During the dose escalation from 50 mg to 400 mg QD cohort, 1 pt given 250 mg QD experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 3 lipase increased. MTD was not reached. 12 (28.6%) pts reported grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), which reported in ≥ 2 pts was abdominal pain. Efficacy signals were observed especially in LGG pts, in the efficacy evaluated set (N = 14), objective response rate (ORR) was 7.1%, disease control rate was 100%; in the safety analysis set (N = 17), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 20.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]; 5.5-not estimable). One grade 2 glioma pt with multiple previous treatment on the 200 mg QD achieved minor response lasting 16.8 months. The ORR of grade 4 glioma pts and non glioma pts were not reached, the disease control rate were 33.3% and 25%, respectively. Drug exposures were dose-proportional from 50 mg to 400 mg. Steady-state with ~5-fold accumulation was reached after ~28 days of repeated daily dosing. In non-glioma pts, 2-HG inhibition plateaued after ~28 days, increasing with dose, reaching ~90% at ≥150 mg at C2D1. Conclusions: ’306 was well-tolerated in pts with mIDH1/2 solid tumors, showing target inhibition and durable responses in LGG. Clinical trial information: NCT04762602 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (18)
Jordi Rodon Ahnert
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Juan Manuel Sepulveda Sanchez
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
Olatunji B. Alese
Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Georgia Anguera
Medical Oncology Department, Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
Chandrikha Chandrasekharan
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Pearland, TX
Sant P. Chawla
Sarcoma Oncology Center, Santa Monica, CA
Melissa Amber Burgess
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
Maen Abdelrahim
Houston Methodist Neal Cancer Center, Houston, TX
John L. Villano
University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY
Bo Zhang
Yukang Wang
Xiuya Yu
HUTCHMED Limited, Shanghai, China
Zeyu Zhong
HUTCHMED Limited, Shanghai, China
Xian Luo
Songhua Fan
Michael Shi
Weiguo Su
Maria Vieito Villar
Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain