Personalized biomarker-based treatment strategy in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Results of the biomarker-driven cohorts of the EORTC-HNCG-1559 trial (UPSTREAM).

R Rachel Galot (University Hospital Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium) C Christophe Le Tourneau (Institut Curie, Paris) L Lisa F. Licitra (Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori & University of Milan, Milan, Italy) J Joel Guigay (CentreAntoineLacassagne, Nice, France) A Anthony Kong I Inge Tinhofer (Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany) C Caroline Even A Amaury Daste E Esma Saada-Bouzid (Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France) F Frederic Rolland (Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France) S Stephanie Henry (BGOG & CHU UCL Namur Site Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium) S Sylvie Rottey E Emmanuel Seront (Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium) A Annemie Rutten (AZ Sint-Augustinus, Antwerpen, Belgium) P Philip R. Debruyne (Kortrijk Cancer Centre, Department of Medical Oncology, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium) K Konstantina Tsechilidou (EORTC, Brussels, Belgium) C Catherine Fortpied (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brussels Belgium) A Ana Joaquim (EORTC, Brussels, Belgium) A Anne-sophie Govaerts (EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium) J Jean-Pascal H. Machiels (Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium)

Abstract

6028 Background: Platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (R/M SCCHN) has a poor prognosis. Several molecular pathways are dysregulated in SCCHN, providing potential targets for treatment. The UPSTREAM trial aimed to develop a personalized treatment strategy for R/M SCCHN. Methods: UPSTREAM was a biomarker-driven umbrella trial for post-platinum R/M SCCHN, investigating the activity of targeted agents in patients (pts) with tumors harboring pre-defined biomarker(s) identified on a fresh biopsy. Five biomarker-driven (B) cohorts were conducted as distinct phase 2 trials. The first 4 cohorts focused on p16-negative disease: cohort B1 investigated afatinib in pts with EGFR amp/mut and/or HER2 amp/mut and/or PTEN high; cohort B2 investigated afatinib in cetuximab-naïve pts; cohort B3 investigated palbociclib in pts with CCND1 amp and cohort B4 investigated niraparib in platinum-sensitive disease. Cohort B5 investigated niraparib in p16 positive oropharyngeal carcinoma. Cohorts B1, B2 and B3 were randomized (versus physician’s choice of treatment) with progression-free survival rate at 16 weeks (PFSR 16W) as primary endpoint. Cohorts B4 and B5 were single-arm trials with objective response rate (ORR) over the first 16 weeks as primary endpoint. Results: A total of 250 pts were enrolled in UPSTREAM across 5 European countries, of whom 152 were allocated to a biomarker-driven cohort. Only B1 met its primary endpoint. In B1 (n=38 under afatinib), the PFSR 16W was 34.2%. B2 cohort experienced slow recruitment, with only 8 patients treated with afatinib, the PFSR 16W was 12.5%. In B3 (n=12 under palbociclib), PFSW 16W was 16.7%. In B4 (n=28) and B5 (n= 33), the ORR with niraparib was 3.6% (1/28) and 6.1% (2/33), respectively. More detailed results are shown in the table. Conclusions: UPSTREAM demonstrated the feasibility of conducting a biomarker-driven clinical trial in R/M SCCHN. The clinical activity observed across the biomarker-driven cohorts is limited. Potential explanations for these results include the absence of clearly identified high-level drivers in SCCHN, the limited evidence supporting some biomarkers (mainly derived from genomic data), and the use of single-agent treatment approaches. These findings highlight the need for further research to identify and refine biomarkers to explore new treatment strategies. Clinical trial information: NCT03088059 . Cohort Biomarker Drug N evaluable patients ORR Median PFS (months) Median OS (months) B1 p16- and EGFR amp/mut or HER2 amp/mut or PTEN high afatinib 38 10.5% 2.2 7.2 physician’s choice 17 5.9% 2.4 5.0 B2 p16- and cetuximab-naïve afatinib 8 0% 2.6 10.7 physician’s choice 4 0% 4.0 4.0 B3 p16- and CCND1 amp palbociclib 12 8.3% 1.9 4.3 Physician’s choice 6 0% 1.9 5.1 B4 p16- and platinum-sensitive niraparib 28 3.6% 2.0 6.8 B5 P16 pos OPC niraparib 33 6.1% 1.8 6.9

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 6028-6028
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

R

Rachel Galot

University Hospital Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium

C

Christophe Le Tourneau

Institut Curie, Paris

L

Lisa F. Licitra

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori & University of Milan, Milan, Italy

J

Joel Guigay

CentreAntoineLacassagne, Nice, France

A

Anthony Kong

I

Inge Tinhofer

Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany

C

Caroline Even

A

Amaury Daste

E

Esma Saada-Bouzid

Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France

F

Frederic Rolland

Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France

S

Stephanie Henry

BGOG & CHU UCL Namur Site Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium

S

Sylvie Rottey

E

Emmanuel Seront

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium

A

Annemie Rutten

AZ Sint-Augustinus, Antwerpen, Belgium

P

Philip R. Debruyne

Kortrijk Cancer Centre, Department of Medical Oncology, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium

K

Konstantina Tsechilidou

EORTC, Brussels, Belgium

C

Catherine Fortpied

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brussels Belgium

A

Ana Joaquim

EORTC, Brussels, Belgium

A

Anne-sophie Govaerts

EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium

J

Jean-Pascal H. Machiels

Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium