Perioperative (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) apalutamide (APA) + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs placebo (PBO) + ADT with radical prostatectomy (RP) in high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer (HR LPC/LAPC): Final analysis of the PROTEUS phase 3 study.

M Mary-Ellen Taplin (Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston) M Martin Gleave (Vancouver Prostate Centre) N Neal D. Shore (START Carolinas/Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC) A Angela Lopez-Gitlitz (Johnson & Johnson, Los Angeles) A Alexander Kretschmer (Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA) E Eleni Efstathiou (Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland) R Ronaldo Damião (Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro) T Toshiyuki Kamoto (University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki City, Japan) A Ashley Ross (Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago) A Alberto Briganti (Urological Research Institute, Comprehensive Cancer Center, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan) B Boris A. Hadaschik (University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany) A Axel Heidenreich (Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany) Álvaro Juárez Soto (Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera, Cadiz, Spain) O Oliver Brendan Rooney (Johnson & Johnson, High Wycombe, United Kingdom) S Shaozhou Ken Tian (Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA) L Lisa Wetherhold (Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA) B Branko Miladinovic (Johnson & Johnson, San Diego, CA) S Sharon McCarthy (Johnson & Johnson, Bridgewater, NJ) C Christopher P. Evans (University of Nevada, Reno) A Adam S. Kibel (Mass General Brigham, Boston)

Abstract

LBA1 Background: RP is potentially curative for patients (pts) with HR LPC/LAPC, yet ≈50% of pts relapse. PROTEUS evaluated whether APA + ADT vs PBO + ADT before and after RP with pelvic lymph node dissection (henceforth, RP) improves pathologic complete response/minimal residual disease (pCR/MRD) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in HR LPC/LAPC. Methods: Pts with newly diagnosed HR LPC/LAPC (histology, prostate-specific antigen [PSA], and cN0/cN1 on conventional imaging) were randomized 1:1 to blinded APA (240 mg/d) or PBO as neoadjuvant treatment (tx) for 6 mo + ADT, with a 2-wk break prior to and a 4-wk break post RP, followed by 6 mo of assigned tx. Dual primary end points, pCR/MRD (≤ypT2, ≤5 mm tumor diameter) and MFS based on conventional or prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) imaging, were assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary end points included event-free survival (EFS), time to first subsequent tx (TTST1), time to distant metastasis (TTDM), and safety. Exploratory end points included residual cancer burden (RCB/MRD; ≤ypT2, ≤0.25 cm 3 ) and investigator-assessed MFS. Results: Of 2109 pts randomized (APA + ADT [1057] or PBO + ADT [1052]), median (range) age was 66.0 (41-89) years (y); PSA, 14.8 (0.0-2798.0) ng/mL; GS ≥8, 95.8%. Median follow-up was 61.7 mo. Both primary end points were met with APA + ADT vs PBO + ADT: pCR/MRD rate was significantly higher, 8.9% vs 1.0% (odds ratio [OR] 10.17; 95% CI 5.27-19.64; p<0.0001); MFS by BICR was significantly improved with HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.67-0.96; p=0.0169 and 5-y MFS rate of 78.2% vs 73.5%; median not reached [NR]. Investigator-assessed MFS favored APA + ADT, with HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.62-0.87; nominal p=0.0004. EFS, TTST1, TTDM were all significantly improved with APA + ADT (Table), as was RCB/MRD: MRD 30.6% vs 11.7%; OR 3.36; 95% CI 2.67-4.23; nominal p<0.0001. Grade 3/4 tx-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for APA + ADT vs PBO + ADT were 39.6% vs 31.0%, with discontinuation due to TEAEs 7.4% vs 2.7%, respectively. Conclusions: APA + ADT significantly increased the curative success of RP in pts with HR LPC/LAPC, with a 10-fold higher odds of pCR/MRD and a clinically meaningful 20% reduction in risk of distant metastasis or death. Secondary end points all favored APA + ADT. These results support combined APA + ADT and RP as a new standard of care for pts with HR LPC/LAPC. Clinical trial information: NCT03767244 . HR(95% CI) p Value a APA + ADTn=1057Median (mo) PBO + ADTn=1052Median (mo) EFS 0.71(0.63-0.80) <0.0001 57.1 38.4 TTST1 (local, regional, or systemic, including ADT reinitiation) 0.65(0.57-0.73) <0.0001 74.2 41.5 TTDM (conventional or PSMA PET imaging) 0.68(0.55-0.83) 0.0002 NR NR a Stratified by GS (7, ≥8), nodal status, and geographic region (North America, European Union, rest of world).

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 17_suppl
Published June 10, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

M

Mary-Ellen Taplin

Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston

M

Martin Gleave

Vancouver Prostate Centre

N

Neal D. Shore

START Carolinas/Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC

A

Angela Lopez-Gitlitz

Johnson & Johnson, Los Angeles

A

Alexander Kretschmer

Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA

E

Eleni Efstathiou

Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland

R

Ronaldo Damião

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro

T

Toshiyuki Kamoto

University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki City, Japan

A

Ashley Ross

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago

A

Alberto Briganti

Urological Research Institute, Comprehensive Cancer Center, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan

B

Boris A. Hadaschik

University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

A

Axel Heidenreich

Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Álvaro Juárez Soto

Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera, Cadiz, Spain

O

Oliver Brendan Rooney

Johnson & Johnson, High Wycombe, United Kingdom

S

Shaozhou Ken Tian

Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA

L

Lisa Wetherhold

Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA

B

Branko Miladinovic

Johnson & Johnson, San Diego, CA

S

Sharon McCarthy

Johnson & Johnson, Bridgewater, NJ

C

Christopher P. Evans

University of Nevada, Reno

A

Adam S. Kibel

Mass General Brigham, Boston