Performance of a blood-biomarker test for early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) across all stages of disease versus a mixed control population.

E Erkut H. Borazanci (HonorHealth Research Institute, Scottsdale, AZ) P Patricio M. Polanco (Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) A Aimee L. Lucas (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY) T Tamas Gonda (Langone Medical Center, New York, NY) J Jose G. Trevino (Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA) E Evan Scott Glazer (University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN) S Salvatore Paiella E Eli Marie Grindedal R Raymond Couric Wadlow (Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA) B Bryson W. Katona (Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) G George Zogopoulos D Daniel A. Sussman (University of Miami, Miami, FL) O Ora Gordon (Providence Health & Services, Renton, WA) J John Davidson (Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, School of Chemistry The University of Manchester Manchester UK) T Thomas C. King (Immunovia, Inc., Marlborough, MA) L Lisa Ford (Immunovia, Durham, NC) N Norma Alonzo Palma (Immunovia, Inc., Marlborough, MA) R Randall E. Brand R Rosalie C. Sears

Abstract

659 Background: Early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a significant impact on pancreatic cancer outcomes. Despite this, 4 in 5 patients are diagnosed at later disease stage where surgery is no longer an option. There is a need for more accurate and less burdensome testing methodology. We previously conducted two independent clinical validation studies (CLARITI and VERIFI) where PancreaSure, a serum-based early detection test for PDAC, showed high accuracy in differentiating early-stage disease versus high-risk control patients. To further understand the performance of the test across a varied patient population, we set out to determine test performance in Stage I-IV PDAC and in healthy controls. Methods: PancreaSure, a biomarker signature comprising a mathematical summation of ICAM-1, THSB1, CTSD, TIMP1, and CA19-9 values with a predefined cutoff to differentiate Stage I and Stage II PDAC from controls at high-risk due to genetic/familial background, was assessed for sensitivity and specificity in detecting Stage III and IV PDAC and in normal, healthy controls. Pooled analysis was conducted to determine weighted performance across all stages of PDAC and in high-risk and healthy controls. Results: The study comprised 317 Stage I-II (early stage) and 152 Stage III-IV (late stage) PDAC cases, 1134 high-risk controls, and 295 healthy controls that were collected from US and European sites. PancreaSure overall weighted sensitivity was 79.8% (73.3-86.4% 95% CI). Sensitivity was 77.6% (73.0-82.2%, 95% CI) in early-stage PDAC and 88.2% (81.8-93.0%, 95% CI) in late-stage PDAC. Overall weighted specificity was 90.8% (87.8-93.8% 95% CI). Specificity was 92.2% (90.6-93.7%, 95% CI) in high-risk controls and 97.7% (95.3-99.1%, 95% CI) in healthy controls. Conclusions: Across a robust clinical experience of almost 1900 patients, PancreaSure showed high accuracy across Stage I-IV PDAC, with improved performance in late-stage disease and in healthy controls. These results support the robustness of the test’s performance and can serve as a tool for both early-stage and late-stage PDAC detection in patients at high and normal risk of pancreatic cancer.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 2_suppl
Published January 10, 2026
Pages 659-659
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

E

Erkut H. Borazanci

HonorHealth Research Institute, Scottsdale, AZ

P

Patricio M. Polanco

Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

A

Aimee L. Lucas

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

T

Tamas Gonda

Langone Medical Center, New York, NY

J

Jose G. Trevino

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA

E

Evan Scott Glazer

University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN

S

Salvatore Paiella

E

Eli Marie Grindedal

R

Raymond Couric Wadlow

Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA

B

Bryson W. Katona

Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

G

George Zogopoulos

D

Daniel A. Sussman

University of Miami, Miami, FL

O

Ora Gordon

Providence Health & Services, Renton, WA

J

John Davidson

Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, School of Chemistry The University of Manchester Manchester UK

T

Thomas C. King

Immunovia, Inc., Marlborough, MA

L

Lisa Ford

Immunovia, Durham, NC

N

Norma Alonzo Palma

Immunovia, Inc., Marlborough, MA

R

Randall E. Brand

R

Rosalie C. Sears