PD-1 inhibitors versus PD-L1 inhibitors in PD-L1–negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of survival outcomes.
Abstract
e20585 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) which target programmed cell death protein 1 receptor (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) are used extensively in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we aimed to compare the relative efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors and PD-L1 inhibitors in PD-L1-negative advanced NSCLC. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE (via PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar) to identify randomized trials of advanced NSCLC that evaluated ICIs (anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1) and reported outcomes stratified by PD-L1 status, including data specific to PD-L1-negative patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p-values for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were extracted for the PD-L1-negative subgroup of each trial. Data were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis, and comparisons between anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 agents were performed. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore variations in effect size. Results: The meta-analysis included 23 trials comprising 4,548 PD-L1-negative patients, representing 33% of all participants. PD-L1 testing was conducted in all studies. Anti-PD-1 agents significantly improved OS in PD-L1-negative patients with advanced NSCLC (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67–0.83, p < 0.01). In contrast, anti-PD-L1 agents did not show a statistically significant improvement in OS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.78–1.05, p = 0.18). Direct comparisons revealed that anti-PD-1 agents were associated with better OS compared to anti-PD-L1 agents (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.67–0.99, p = 0.01). The benefit of anti-PD-1 agents was more pronounced in the first-line setting (pairwise HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66–0.93, p = 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed in later lines of therapy (pairwise HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.82–1.55, p = 0.45). These differences in OS were not reflected in PFS outcomes. Conclusions: Compared to checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-L1, those targeting PD-1 are associated with better OS in PD-L1-negative advanced NSCLC, a finding influenced by trials performed in the first-line setting. This should be validated using real-world studies.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (8)
Laith Al-Showbaki
The University of Jordan, School of Medicine, Amman, Jordan
Malak Al-Kasasbeh
The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
Karem jbaraH
The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
Jowan Al-Nusair
1Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Internal Medicine, Huntington, United States
Saif Yamin
Eitan Amir
Husam Alqaisi
Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
Kamal Hosni Al-rabi
King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan