Patterns of antiphospholipid antibody positivity in a real-world laboratory over two decades

Abstract

Abstract Background Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is diagnosed when vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity occurs in the presence of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Although IgM-isotype antibodies are part of the laboratory criteria, their clinical value remains uncertain. We evaluated real-world aPL testing patterns to quantify the prevalence of isolated IgM positivity. Methods We analyzed aPL testing data across the Mayo Clinic sites between January 2006 and July 2025, lined up with the publication of the revised Sapporo (Sydney) classification criteria. For each patient, we identified the first time in which any aPL test was performed. We assessed available results for Lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) isotypes IgG and IgM, and anti–beta 2 glycoprotein (B2GP1) isotypes IgG and IgM. Positivity rates were calculated for each marker, and a subgroup of patients who had results for all three test categories at the initial workup was identified. In this cohort, we assessed the distribution of single, double, and triple positivity. We also quantified the number and percentage of patients who were positive only for IgM isotypes (aCL or B2GP1), with negative LA and IgG at initial testing. Antibodies were considered positive based on international criteria and internal standards. aCL and B2GP1 were positive if ≥40 units. LA positivity followed ISTH SSC guidelines, requiring demonstration of a phospholipid-dependent inhibitor in the following assays: screening, mixing, and confirmatory steps in DRVVT or aPTT-based platelet neutralization procedure (PNP), Staclot LA delta and HEX LA delta assays. Criteria for a positive result was as follows: DRVVT: prolonged screen and inhibited mix with screen/confirm ratio >1.2; Staclot LA delta: >7 seconds; PNP: shortening of the APTT clotting time with PNP by ≥5 seconds before 2023 and ≥2 seconds thereafter; HEX LA delta >13 seconds. Results A total of 99,814 unique patients underwent testing for at least one aPL marker. The most frequently tested was LA (n = 75,085), with a positivity rate of 10.29% (7,730/75,085). Among antibody isotypes, positivity rates were 1.2% (846/69,539) for aCL IgG, 1.7% (1,198/69,640) for aCL IgM, 1.9% (732/37,791) for B2GP1 IgG, and 2.0% (762/37,601) for B2GP1 IgM. Among the 30,274 patients who underwent simultaneous testing for LA, aCL IgG/IgM, and B2GP1 IgG/IgM, 1.3% (n = 407) were triple-positive, 1.4% (n = 427) were double-positive, and 9.9% (n = 3,009) had a single positive marker. The remaining 87.3% (n = 26,431) tested negative for all three. Of the 3,009 patients with only one positive marker, 9.8% (n = 296) were positive exclusively for aCL IgM, and 7.4% (n = 224) were positive exclusively for B2GP1 IgM. Among all fully tested patients, 2.2% (668/30,274) were positive for only IgM isotypes (either aCL or B2GP1) in the absence of IgG and LA positivity. Specifically, 0.9% (n = 296) were exclusively positive for aCL IgM and 0.7% (n = 224) for B2GP1 IgM. Additionally, 0.5% (n = 148) were simultaneously positive for both aCL IgM and B2GP1 IgM, without associated IgG or LA markers. Had only IgG and LA been assayed, 17.4 % (668/3843) of initially positive patients—and one-third of those classified as triple-positive—would have been missed. Conclusion Within this large-scale analysis of real-world APS test ordering practice, less than one-third of orders included a comprehensive characterization. Isolated IgM positivity, defined as aCL or B2GP1 IgM in the absence of IgG and LA, was infrequent yet represents a sizable proportion of initial positive aPL testing. How these results impact APS diagnosis and management of APS requires further study.