Patient (pt) preferences for treatment (tx) of non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (nmHSPC): A discrete choice experiment (DCE).

N Neal D. Shore (START Carolinas/Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC) B Bhavik J. Pandya (Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Northbrook, IL) W Weiguang Xue (Analysis Group Ltd., London, United Kingdom) H Hongbo Yang Y Yan Meng (Marine Science and Technology Domain, Beijing Institute of Technology) S Stan Fort (Astellas Pharma Global Inc., Northbrook, IL) J Janet Kim (Astellas Pharma Inc., Northbrook, IL) A Andrew Chilelli A Arijit Ganguli (Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Northbrook, IL) A Axel Stuart Merseburger (University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany)

Abstract

338 Background: Prostate cancer tx guidelines recommend androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) ± androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) as an effective alternative to ADT alone for pts with high-risk biochemically recurrent nmHSPC. ARPI ± ADT offers improved efficacy and a tolerable safety profile compared with ADT alone; however, understanding which attributes pts consider most when assessing tx options is important. This study quantified pt preferences for ARPIs ± ADT vs ADT alone in pts with nmHSPC across 9 countries, using a DCE method. Methods: Using convenience sampling, an online panel-based DCE survey was developed and administered to 374 pts with nmHSPC who had undergone definitive tx. The DCE included 14 choice cards, each presenting 2 hypothetical tx options with varying levels of efficacy (metastasis-free survival [MFS], tx suspension), tx-emergent adverse events (risk of fatigue, hot flashes, breast swelling), and sexual well-being (duration of interest in sex, duration of keeping erectile function). MFS was selected, as it served as a key efficacy endpoint in an nmHSPC study and is associated with overall survival. Pts were recruited from US (n = 56), Italy (n = 53), Germany (n = 52), UK (n = 43), Brazil (n = 40), France (n = 40), South Korea (n = 40), Spain (n = 40), and Australia (n = 10). Preference weights were estimated using a random parameter logit model. Relative attribute importance was derived from these weights and the corresponding attribute levels. EMBARK trial profiles for ARPI and ADT informed tx choice probabilities, and pts were assigned to the option with the highest predicted probability. Results: Median age was 66 years (IQR: 63.0–69.0). Of all pts, 245 (66%) were married/in a relationship and 109 (29%) were sexually active. Recurrence occurred in 157 (42%) pts after definitive tx. The most important attributes were 5-year MFS, risk of hot flashes, and duration of sexual interest relative to pre-tx baseline (Table). Among the pts, 363 (97%) selected ARPI ± ADT as their preferred tx option while 11 (3%) preferred ADT alone. Conclusions: In this DCE study, pts preferred ARPIs ± ADT vs ADT alone. MFS was the most significant driver of pt choices, followed by risk of hot flashes then interest in sex. These preferences suggest that ARPI-based txs may be viewed more favorably, which may reflect pts’ risk-benefit tradeoffs, favoring txs that balance clinical effectiveness, adverse events, and impact on sexual quality of life. Overall, the results support using personalized care plans for pts with nmHSPC. Attribute Relative importance, % (95% CI) 5-year MFS 28.9 (22.7, 35.2) Risk of hot flashes 18.6 (12.8, 24.5) Duration of sexual interest while on tx 17.4 (11.9, 22.9) Risk of breast swelling 11.7 (6.7, 16.8) Tx suspension 8.2 (1.5, 14.8) Duration of keeping erectile function while on tx 7.6 (2.6, 12.7) Risk of fatigue 7.5 (2.3, 12.6)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 338-338
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (10)

N

Neal D. Shore

START Carolinas/Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC

B

Bhavik J. Pandya

Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Northbrook, IL

W

Weiguang Xue

Analysis Group Ltd., London, United Kingdom

H

Hongbo Yang

Y

Yan Meng

Marine Science and Technology Domain, Beijing Institute of Technology

S

Stan Fort

Astellas Pharma Global Inc., Northbrook, IL

J

Janet Kim

Astellas Pharma Inc., Northbrook, IL

A

Andrew Chilelli

A

Arijit Ganguli

Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Northbrook, IL

A

Axel Stuart Merseburger

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany