Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in primary CNS lymphoma of T-cell origin: A multi-institution retrospective analysis
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Primary central nervous system T-cell lymphoma (PCNSTL) is a rare form of PCNSL, comprising 2–8% of cases. Prognostic factors remain undefined, and no standard treatment protocol currently exists. Prior studies have been limited by small sample sizes, incomplete molecular profiling, and poor representation of novel treatment modalities. In this study, we aimed to identify clinicopathologic factors associated with patient (pt) outcomes and delineate the spectrum of treatment regimens used to inform future clinical practice. Methods A multicenter retrospective study was conducted across 15 North American academic institutions. Pts aged ≥18 years with biopsy-confirmed PCNSTL between 2009 and 2025 with no evidence of systemic disease were included. Cases with CNS relapse of systemic T-cell lymphoma were excluded. Baseline characteristics were analyzed using independent t-tests, Fisher's exact tests, or Pearson's chi-square tests. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), evaluated by Kaplan–Meier, log-rank tests, and Cox regression. Results: Forty-two pts met inclusion criteria. Median age was 57 (range 19–77), 69% were male, and 79% were white. Most (69%) had ECOG 0–1. No patients had HIV, hepatitis B or C, or a history of solid organ transplant. LDH was elevated at diagnosis in 38%, and 24% had B-symptoms. Mean absolute lymphocyte count at diagnosis was 1.82/µL. The most common histologic subtypes were PTCL-NOS (76%), followed by ALK-negative ALCL (12%) and γδ T-cell lymphoma (5%). All patients had parenchymal brain lesions with 57% having multifocal disease. Additionally, CSF involvement was seen in 21%, vitreoretinal involvement in 3%, and deep brain involvement in 34%. Next-generation sequencing was performed in seven pts (17%), with disease-associated variants identified in three cases. Among these, two pts had mutations in TP53, and one had a mutation in DNMT3A. Cytogenetics were obtained in 7 pts with only one exhibiting a complex karyotype. Only one pt was EBV positive by EBER-ISH. Overall, 79% received HD-MTX-based therapy. First-line treatments were mainly HD-MTX alone (38%), HD-MTX + temozolomide (17%), or vincristine + procarbazine (12%). No patients were treated on clinical trials. Median treatment duration was 78 days and median number of treatment cycles was 4 (range 1–9 cycles). One patient received radiation alone; 5% received radiation with systemic therapy. A steroid pre-phase was used in 60%, with 44% exhibiting a clinical response. Overall response rate to first-line treatment was 63% (13 CR, 12 PR). Imaging alone was used in determining response in all patients. Repeated biopsy was not performed. Twelve patients (29%) underwent consolidative autologous transplant, most commonly with thiotepa/carmustine (TT/BCNU, 69%) or BEAM conditioning (25%). Median duration of follow-up was 10.4 months. Sixty-two percent of pts progressed during the study period, with 7% experiencing extra-CNS relapse. Median PFS was 8.2 months. Improved PFS was associated with >3 cycles of therapy (p=0.03) and transplant with TT/BCNU (p=0.0004). At last follow-up, 43% were in remission and 52% were deceased, mostly due to disease progression (77%). Median OS was 17.6 months. One- and two-year OS rates were 58% and 42%, respectively. OS was associated with Nottingham/Barcelona score <2 (p=0.02), >3 treatment cycles (p=0.0008), response to first-line therapy (p=0.0007), and TT/BCNU-based transplant (p=0.0001). IELSG, Taipei, and MSKCC risk scores were not significantly associated with survival, though IELSG approached significance (p=0.09). Discussion: This study is among the largest cohorts of PCNSTL pts compiled to date. PCNSTL remains rare and heterogenous. Treatment across centers largely mirrors management of B-cell PCNSL with high utilization of HD-MTX regimens and TT/BCNU conditioning autologous transplant. Survival outcomes within our cohort are consistent with those previously reported within the literature. Receipt of >3 cycles of therapy, TT/BCNU conditioning and Nottingham/Barcelona scores were associated with longer survival within our cohort. Limitations of our study include its retrospective design and heterogeneity within pt disease characteristics, treatments utilized and disease assessment intervals. Further exploration into pathophysiology and optimal management of this unique entity is needed.
Article Details
Authors (31)
Omar Elghawy
2Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Nishwant Swami
1University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Cancer Center, Lymphoma Program, Philadelphia, United States
Ayo Falade
2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Arushi Khurana
2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Anuja Abhyankar
17Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
Francisco Hernandez-Ilizaliturri
21Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
Prashanth Moku
4Brown University Health, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Providence, United States
Thomas Ollila
2Rhode Island Hospital, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Providence, United States
Charlotte Zuber
2Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, United States
Yun Kyoung Tiger
6Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, United States
Felix Ehret
6Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Boston, United States
Jorg Dietrich
3Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Joseph Lukowski
15University of Nebraska, Omaha, United States
Matthew Lunning
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology and Hematology, Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center and Nebraska Medicine, Omaha
Nathan Roberts
1University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
Enrica Marchi
1University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
Taylor Kujawa
4Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Salt Lake City, United States
Narendranath Epperla
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Cassandra Duarte
1University of Colorado, Aurora, United States
Bradley Haverkos
1University of Colorado, Aurora, United States
John Fortunato
11University of Michigan, Department of Neurology, Ann Arbor, United States
Marcus Watkins
7Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, United States
Neha Mehta-Shah
3Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
Yifei Hu
Peter Riedell
3University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
Yumeng Zhang
Massachusetts Institute of Technology , , , ,
Venkata Preetam Sandeep Kaduluri
1Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, United States
Cole Sterling
3Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Baltimore, United States
Sunita Dwivedy Nasta
1Lymphoma Program, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
Jakub Svoboda
Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Stefan Barta
25University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States