PARPi effectiveness after CDK4/6i in <i>BRCA1</i> - and <i>BRCA2</i> -associated HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: Results from the multicenter real-world PAMBRACA study.
Abstract
1063 Background: Poly(adenosine diphosphate–ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are the paramount of personalized therapy for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant (P/LPV) carriers with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (aBC). Nevertheless, data on the efficacy of PARPi following cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) are limited. Methods: The PAMBRACA study is a multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective-prospective cohort study enrolling BRCA1 and BRCA2 -P/LPV carriers with HR+/HER2- aBC treated with ET+CDK4/6i and/or PARPi. In this analysis, the real-world Progression-Free Survivals (rwPFS) of ET+CDK4/6i and subsequent lines were evaluated through Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Median follow-up was calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression model was used to adjust the association between treatment regimens and rwPFS for clinically relevant variables. Results: We included12 BRCA1 and 57 BRCA2 -P/LPV carriers who were diagnosed with HR+/HER2- aBC between January 1998 and December 2023 in six Italian Institutions. All the patients (pt) received CDK4/6i+ET for aBC (85.5% as first line, 7.2% as second line, 7.3% as third or subsequent line). At CDK4/6i starting, median age was 45 years (range 28-80); 52.2% of pts had visceral metastases and 17.4% had de novo aBC. Median follow-up was 39.5 months (mo). Among pts treated with CDK4/6i as first or second line, median rwPFS was 15.1 mo (95%CI 11.8-18.5) and 3.1 mo (95%CI 2.1-NA), respectively. Among the 49 patients who progressed to first or second-line CDK4/6i, 17 (34.7%) received a PARPi as first line post-CDK4/6i, 12 (24.5%) a monochemotherapy (monoCT), 8 (16.3%) an ET (+/- everolimus), 8 (16.3%) a polychemotherapy (polyCT) and 4 (8.2%) died without receiving a subsequent line. No significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics were observed among the treatment groups, except for the number of metastatic sites (<3 vs > 3), which was higher for pts receiving mono/polyCT (p = 0.053). PARPi treatment was associated with significantly higher median rwPFS (13 mo vs 4.5 mo for monoCT vs 3 mo for ET vs 6 mo for polyCT, p < 0.001), also after adjusting for the number of metastatic sites [for PARPi vs other lines, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.20, 95%CI 0.09-0.49, p < 0.001]. 17 pts received PARPi as later treatment lines, which were independently associated with lower median rwPFS vs PARPi as first post-CDK4/6i line (6 vs 13 mo, aHR 2.81, 95%CI 1.15-6.90, p = 0.024). Conclusions: AfterCDK4/6i+ET, PARPi were independently associated with longer rwPFS compared to other systemic therapies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 -P/LPV carriers with HR+/HER2- aBC. Earlier PARPi use after CDK4/6i was associated with greater clinical benefit.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (17)
Emma Zattarin
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
Antonio Marra
Antonella Palazzo
Fondazione Policlinico Univeristario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
Gaia Griguolo
Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, and Division of Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
Claudio Vernieri
Julian Etessami
Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
Letizia Pontolillo
Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
Arianna Daneri
Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Metropolitana, Genova, Italy
Matteo De Monte
Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milano, Milano, Italy
Ornella Ponzoni
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
Martina Manni
29University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
Federica Domati
Università Degli Studi Di Modena Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
Giuseppe Curigliano
Massimo Dominici
Laboratory of Cellular Therapy, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults
Laura Cortesi
Matteo Lambertini
Angela Toss