Palliative care utilization patterns in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy hospitalizations: A six-year nationwide analysis.
Abstract
e23165 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is commonly administered with curative intent for hematologic malignancies; however, a subset of patients experiences severe inpatient complications requiring high-acuity care. National patterns of palliative care consultation (PCC) during CAR T-cell therapy hospitalizations and their associations with mortality, goals-of-care decisions, complications, length of stay (LOS), and healthcare costs remain poorly characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2017–2022). Adult hospitalizations for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), or multiple myeloma (MM) in which CAR T-cell therapy was administered were identified using ICD-10-PCS codes. PCC was defined using ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes. Survey-weighted analyses generated national estimates. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models assessed associations between PCC and clinical outcomes, adjusting for demographics, comorbidity burden, payer status, and hospital characteristics (two-sided p < 0.05). Results: Among an estimated 5,850 CAR T-cell therapy hospitalizations, 405 (6.9%) involved PCC. Patients receiving PCC were most likely to have NHL (70.4%) followed by MM (21.0%), higher comorbidity burden (Charlson Comorbidity Index > 2: 56.8% vs. 44.8%, p < 0.05), and protein-energy malnutrition (50.6% vs. 16.4%, p < 0.05). There were no differences in age, sex, race, income quartile, or insurance type. PCC independently predicted in-hospital mortality (23.5% vs. 1.1%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 32.4; 95% CI, 12.2–85.7) and was strongly associated with Do-Not-Resuscitate status (aOR, 34.5; 95% CI, 13.5–87.7) and discharge to hospice or post-discharge supportive care (aOR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4–4.3). PCC was associated with sepsis (aOR, 4.4; 95% CI, 2.1–9.5), acute kidney injury (aOR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.03–3.72), respiratory failure (aOR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.2–8.0), shock (aOR, 5.5; 95% CI, 2.7–11.2), mechanical ventilation (aOR, 11.0; 95% CI, 5.4–22.5), renal replacement therapy (aOR, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.4–16.5), and vasopressor use (aOR, 5.1; 95% CI, 2.2–11.9). PCC was associated with longer adjusted LOS (+13.8 days) and higher hospitalization charges (+$584,197; both p < 0.05). No significant associations were observed with cytokine release syndrome or thrombo-hemorrhagic complications. Conclusions: Findings from this nationally representative cohort of CAR T-cell therapy hospitalizations suggest that palliative care involvement reflects clinical severity rather than treatment failure and remains underutilized (6.9%). Furthermore, they align with prior literature supporting earlier integration of palliative care alongside disease-directed therapy to enhance complex inpatient decision-making.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (11)
Abdu Mohammed
6Trinity Health System, Ohio, United States
Adamsegd Isac Gebremedhen
Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, WV
Khadija Noor Sami
Trinity Health Systems, Steubenville, OH
Saqib Peracha
Trinity Health Systems, Steubenville, OH
Noor Ul Huda
Trinity Health Systems, Steubenville, OH
Kiran Khurshid
Commando Talreja
Trinity Health Systems, Steubenville, OH
Jason Miller
Matthew Carney
Trinity Health System, Steubenville, OH
Joseph Pathakamuri
Trinity Health System, Steubenville, OH
M. Pervaiz Pervaiz Rahman
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Cancer Center, Steubenville, OH