Palbociclib in patients (pts) with ovarian cancer (OC) with CDKN2A alterations: Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) study.
Abstract
e17660 Background: TAPUR is a phase II basket study evaluating antitumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in pts with advanced cancers with genomic alterations. Results in a cohort of pts with OC with CDKN2A alterations treated with palbociclib, an oral cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, are reported. Methods: Eligible pts had measurable disease, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2, adequate organ function, and no standard treatment (tx) options. Tumors must not have had mutations (mut) in the RB gene. Genomic testing was performed in CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited site selected labs. Palbociclib dosing was one 125 mg capsule taken orally once daily for 21 days followed by 7 days off, until disease progression. Primary endpoint was disease control (DC) per investigator defined as complete or partial (PR) response per RECIST v. 1.1, or stable disease (SD) of at least 16 weeks (wks) duration (SD16+). Simon 2-stage design was based on a null DC rate of 15% vs. 35% (power = 0.85; α = 0.10). If ≥2 of 10 pts in stage I had DC, 18 more pts were enrolled; otherwise, the cohort was closed. If ≥7 of 28 pts had DC, the null DC rate was rejected. Secondary endpoints were objective response (OR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR) and SD, and safety. DOR is defined as time from pt’s first documented OR to progressive disease (PD). Duration of SD is defined as time from tx initiation to PD. Results: From February 2017 to April 2023, 28 pts with OC were enrolled. Table shows demographics and outcomes. Genomic profiling showed CDKN2A deletion (del; n=20), CDKN2A mut (n=4), or both CDKN2A mut and del (n=3). Most common co-alterations were in: CDKN2B (n=17), TP53 (n=15), and PIK3CA (n=5). 3 PRs ( CDKN2A del [n=3]) and 7 SD16+ ( CDKN2A del [n=5]; CDKN2A mut [n=1]; CDKN2A mut and del [n=1]) were observed for DC rate of 37% (90% CI, 24 to 100) and OR rate of 11% (95% CI, 2 to 28). The null DC rate was rejected (p=0.005). All but 1 pt with DC had serous carcinoma histology. DORs for 2 pts with PR were 26 and 60 wks. 1 pt had a PR at their final visit, decided to end study procedures, and DOR is not available. Median duration of SD for the pts with SD16+ was 30 wks (range, 16-78). 19 pts had ≥1 tx-related grade 3-4 adverse event (AE) or serious AE, including anemia, dyspnea, fatigue, leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Conclusions: Palbociclib showed antitumor activity in pts with OC with CDKN2A alterations. Additional study is warranted to confirm the efficacy of palbociclib in this pt population. Clinical trial information: NCT02693535 . Demographics and efficacy outcomes (N=28). Median age, yrs (range) 57 (33-85) ECOG PS, N (%) 0 9 (32) 1 19 (68) Prior systemic regimens, N (%) 12≥3 3520 (11) (18) (71) DC (OR plus SD16+) rate, % (90% CI), p-value 37 (24, 100), p=0.005 OR rate, % (95% CI) 11 (2, 28) Median PFS, wks (95% CI) 9 (8, 16) Median OS, wks (95% CI) 36 (25, 56)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Dan Steven Veljovich
Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA
Michael Rothe
Institute of Experimental Hematology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
Pam K. Mangat
ASCO, Alexandria, VA
Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer
ASCO, Alexandria, VA
Hussein Moustapha Ali-Ahmad
Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, Lansing, MI
R. Wendel Naumann
Atrium Health Levine Cancer Wake Forest University, Charlotte, NC
Jean Siedel
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
John K. Chan
California Pacific Medical Center/Sutter Health, San Francisco, CA
Andrew Gregory
2Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, United States
Evan P. Pisick
City of Hope - Chicago, Zion, IL
Bamidele Adesunloye
City of Hope - Atlanta, Atlanta, GA
Rebecca Christian Arend
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, UAB Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
Maria C Bell
Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD
Marina Frimer
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwell Health, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, NY
Bernard Tawfik
University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque
Ramya Thota
Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, UT
Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Abby Gregory
ASCO, Alexandria, VA
Susan Halabi
From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...
Richard L. Schilsky
ASCO, Alexandria, VA