Overall survival for patients with pre-treated platinum-resistant ovarian cancer receiving gotistobart in combination with pembrolizumab.
Abstract
5511 Background: Gotistobart, an investigational tumor microenvironment-selective Treg depletion antibody targeting CTLA-4 with a novel mechanism of action, demonstrated anti-tumor activity when combined with prembrolizumab in the PRESERVE-004/GOG-3081 trial in patients (pts) with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC; Barlin et al., ESMO 2024). Here, we present overall survival (OS) and updated safety data from the Phase 2 trial (NCT05446298). Methods: Pts with PROC, tubal, or peritoneal cancer who previously received 1 line of platinum-based therapy and progressed between 3-6 months or received ≥1 line and progressed within 6 months of last dose, were treated with gotistobart (1, 2, 3, or 6 mg/kg, Q3W) and pembrolizumab (200 mg, Q3W). Here we present data from patients that received 1 or 2 mg/kg gotistobart Q3W and pembrolizumab. Primary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) based on RECIST 1.1 and safety. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Results: As of November 12, 2025, 83 pts were treated with ≥1 dose of gotistobart in combination with pembrolizumab. Among them, 62 pts (85.5% White with a median age of 65 years and 83.9% with high grade serous OC) had received 1 or 2 mg/kg gotistobart, and 75.8% had received ≥3 lines of prior therapy (median 4, range: 1-10). The median time from randomization to database cutoff was 22.3 months (range 17.8, 27.2). Median OS was 18.9 m (95% CI 3.9, NE) and 8.3 m (95% CI 3.9 – 17.1) with the OS rates at 18 months at 54.3% (95% CI 35.1, 70.0) and 26.9% (95% CI 11.7 - 44.7) in pts that received 1 or 2 mg/kg gotistobart, respectively. Efficacy data are summarized in the table below. Grade ≥3 treatment-related (gotistobart or pembrolizumab) adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 51.5% and 55.2% pts treated with 1 mg/kg or 2 mg/kg, respectively. Common (≥5%) grade ≥3 TRAEs were colitis (1 mg/kg: 12.1%, 2 mg/kg: 10.3%), hyponatremia (1 mg/kg: 12.1%, 2 mg/kg: 3.4%), increased ALT (1 mg/kg: 9.1%, 2 mg/kg: 3.4%), increased AST (1mg/kg: 9.1%, 2 mg/kg: 3.4%), adrenal insufficiency (1 mg/kg: 9.1%, 2 mg/kg: 3.4%), diarrhea (1 mg/kg: 9.1%, 2 mg/kg: 3.4%), and hypokalemia (1 mg/kg: 0%, 2 mg/kg: 6.9%). Conclusions: The chemotherapy-free combination of gotistobart and pembrolizumab demonstrated clinically meaningful ORR, OS and a manageable safety profile in pts with PROC, where the majority were heavily pretreated with no further standard-of-care treatment options. Clinical trial information: NCT05446298 . 1 mg/kg gotistobart + pembrolizumab(n=33) 2 mg/kg gotistobart + pembrolizumab(n=29) Confirmed ORR, % (95% CI) 21.2 (9.0, 38.9) 20.7 (8.0, 39.7) Median DoR, m (95% CI) 10.8 (3.3, NE) 11.6 (4.0, NE) Median PFS, m (95% CI) 2.2 (2.0, 4.2) 2.5 (1.9, 6.0) Median OS, m (95% CI) 18.9 (3.9, NE) 8.3 (3.9, 17.1) OS rate at 18 months, % (95% CI) 54.3 (35.1, 70.0) 26.9 (11.7, 44.7)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Joyce N. Barlin
Womens Cancer Care Associates, Albany, NY
Peter C. Lim
Gynecologic Oncology, Center of Hope, Reno, NV
Jessica Thomes Pepin
Minnesota Oncology, Minneapolis, MN
Elizabeth Hopp
Noelle Cloven
Texas Oncology, Fort Worth, Fort Worth, TX
Helen Dinkelspiel Eshed
Texas Oncology, Austin, TX
Destin Black
Trials 365, LLC, Shreveport, LA
Hope M. Cottrill
Baptist Health Lexington, Lexington, KY
Lauren Hand
Baptist MD Anderson Cancer Center, Jacksonville, FL
David M. O’Malley
The Ohio State University and the James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
Linus T. Chuang
Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, Long Island, NY
Christine M. Lee
Lyndsay Willmott
Arizona Center for Cancer Care, Phoenix, AZ
Michael Jon Chisamore
Joan Durbin
OncoC4, Inc., Rockville, MD
Pan Zheng
Key Laboratory of Superlight Materials & Surface Technology of Ministry of Education, College of Material Sciences and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, P. R. China
Yang Liu
Andre Overesch
BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany
Svetlana Shpyro
BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany
Bradley J. Monk