Overall survival and biomarker results of NURE-Combo: A phase 2 study of neoadjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) and nab-paclitaxel (ABX) followed by postsurgical adjuvant NIVO in patients (pts) with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

C Chiara Mercinelli (Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy) G Giuseppe Basile (Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy) J James A. Proudfoot (Veracyte Inc, San Francisco, CA) J Joep de Jong (Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands) A Antonio Cigliola (Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy) V Valentina Tateo (Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy) B Brigida Anna Maiorano E Elai Davicioni M Michela Ravasi (Oncology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy) M Maurizio Colecchia (Department of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy) M Marco Moschini G Giorgio Brembilla (Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy) F Francesco De Cobelli A Alberto Briganti (Urological Research Institute, Comprehensive Cancer Center, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan) F Francesco Montorsi (Dipartimento di Chimica industriale “Toso Montanari”, Università di Bologna, via Piero Gobetti 85, Bologna 40129, Italy) A Andrea Necchi (Department of Medical Oncology Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori University of Milan Milan Italy)

Abstract

4594 Background: The first results of NureCombo revealed the combination of NIVO + ABX followed by RC and adjuvant NIVO was active in pts with MIBC (Mercinelli, JCO 2024). We report key secondary endpoints after study completion including adjuvant NIVO for all pts (NCT04876313). Methods: Eligible pts who were cisplatin unfit or declined cisplatin-based treatment had previously untreated MIBC (clinical stage T2-T4a, N0-1, M0), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1, and predominant ( > 50%) UC histology. Pts received 4 cycles of NIVO 360 mg Q3W + ABX 125 mg/m2 on Day 1 and 8, Q3W, followed by RC and by 13 administrations of adjuvant NIVO 360 mg Q3W. Transcriptome-wide analyses with Decipher Bladder (Veracyte, San Diego, CA) on primary TURBT tissue samples are presented. Continuous scores were dichotomized by median splits. Results: 31 pts were enrolled from 12/2021 to 06/2023, of which 17 (54.8%) had cT3-4 and 14 (45.2%) cT2. N = 2 (6.4%) had cN1 and 15 (48.4%) had a variant histology component. In total, 9 pts (29%) never started the adjuvant NIVO and 15 pts (48.4%) completed it: reason for discontinuation were treatment-related adverse events (TRAE; 5 pts, 16.1%) and relapse (2 pts; 0.6%). Median follow-up was 25 months (IQR: 21-32) and the minimum follow up was 19 months. In total, 7 pts experienced a relapse, 2/7 consisting of an intravesical relapse in those who refused to undergo RC (N = 3). 24-month (24m) event-free survival (EFS) was 73.7% (95%CI 59.6-91.2), corresponding to the 24m relapse-free survival (RFS) post-RC; 24m overall survival (OS) was 89.7% (95%CI 79.3-100; median OS was not reached). There were no additional/late TRAE compared to the initial report. Transcriptome profiles were available for N = 24: Genomic Subtyping Classifier (GSC) stratification revealed ypT0 was highest (50%) in N = 18 Non-luminal (claudin low, basal & infiltrated-luminal) subtypes and lowest (17%) in N = 6 luminal subtype ((p = 0.34). Based on Consensus MIBC classification, none of N = 4 luminal-papillary tumors had a ypT0 response (p = 0.09). Higher Immune190 and higher ESTIMATE-stromal signature trended to better RFS (HR 0.39 & 0.38, respectively). Conclusions: Long-term follow-up results of NureCombo revealed sustained efficacy of ABX-NIVO combination therapy followed by adjuvant NIVO in pts with MIBC. Molecular classification of baseline tumors revealed less favorable pathologic response rates for luminal MIBC. Differences in molecular correlates compared to PURE-01 may be related to different checkpoint inhibition (nivo vs pembro) or due to addition of ABX. Clinical trial information: NCT04876313 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 4594-4594
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

C

Chiara Mercinelli

Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy

G

Giuseppe Basile

Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy

J

James A. Proudfoot

Veracyte Inc, San Francisco, CA

J

Joep de Jong

Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

A

Antonio Cigliola

Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy

V

Valentina Tateo

Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy

B

Brigida Anna Maiorano

E

Elai Davicioni

M

Michela Ravasi

Oncology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

M

Maurizio Colecchia

Department of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy

M

Marco Moschini

G

Giorgio Brembilla

Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy

F

Francesco De Cobelli

A

Alberto Briganti

Urological Research Institute, Comprehensive Cancer Center, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan

F

Francesco Montorsi

Dipartimento di Chimica industriale “Toso Montanari”, Università di Bologna, via Piero Gobetti 85, Bologna 40129, Italy

A

Andrea Necchi

Department of Medical Oncology Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori University of Milan Milan Italy