Outcomes with non-BCMA CAR T cell therapy for multiple myeloma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Abstract
e19541 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) has shown promise in treating multiple myeloma. Anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy for MM has exhibited deep responses, but patients eventually get relapsed disease, which requires the need to explore non-BCMA targeted therapies. This meta-analysis aims to explore the non-BCMA CAR-T options for the MM patients. Methods: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Medline, and Embase following PRISMA guidelines and three studies reporting outcomes of non-BCMA CAR-T in MM patients were included after screening 1380 studies. Inter-study variance was assessed using the Der Simonian-Laird Estimator, and pooled analysis was conducted with 95% confidence intervals using the ‘meta’ package in R (version 4.16-2). Results: A total of 60 patients from three studies (2022-2023) were included in the analysis. The median age was 58 (38-76) years and the majority were male (60%, n=36). One study (33%) was phase II trial while the remaining two (67%) were phase I. All patients received GPRC5D-targeted CAR T cells. A median number of prior therapies was 5.8 (5.5-6) which included autologous transplantation (42%, n=25) and BCMA CAR T cell therapy (37%, n=22). High-risk cytogenetics was seen in 53% (n=32). Median follow-up time was 7.9 (5.2-10.1) months. The pooled rates of overall response rate (OR), complete response (CR), stringent complete response (SCR), very good partial response (VGPR), and partial response (PR) were 89.1% (95% CI 0.79-0.97, I 2 =64%, p=0.06, n=60), 24.1% (95% CI 0.14-0.36, I 2 =73%, p=0.03, n=60), 23.3% (95% CI 0.13-0.36, I 2 =89%, p<0.01, n=60), 18.7% (95% CI 0.09-0.30, I 2 =44%, p=0.17, n=60), and 10.2% (95% CI 0.03-0.20, I 2 =10%, p=0.33, n=60), respectively. The pooled rates of MRD negativity and mortality were 76.5% (95% CI 0.64-0.87, I 2 =83%, p<0.01, n=60) and 0.8% (95% CI 0.00-0.06, I 2 =0%, p=0.82, n=60). Median duration of response was 3.1 (0.5-5.1) months. Adverse events encountered were neutropenia (100%, n=60), anemia (85%, n=51), thrombocytopenia (80%, n=48), and cytokine release syndrome (42%, n=25). At 9 months, Zhang et al. reported a progression-free survival (PFS) of 87.5% (95% CI 38.7-98.1). Conclusions: GPRC5D can be an effective non-BCMA target for the treatment of myeloma. It has shown encouraging responses with tolerable side-effect profile. Further trials with new targets are required to understand the impact on survival and risk of relapse in the longer run.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (9)
Syed Maaz Tariq
1White River Health System, Internal Medicine, Batesville, United States
Muhammad Fareed Khalid
Danbury Hospital, Danbury, CT
Jawad Noor
St. Dominic Hospital, Jackson, MS
Ibrahim Khamees
2University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, United States
Sarmad Zaman Warraich
3Medical University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
Muhammad Salman Faisal
1University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, United States
Muhammad Umair Mushtaq
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
Michael Vishal Jaglal
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
Moazzam Shahzad
10H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States