Outcomes of surveillance in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) who tested negative for high-risk mutations (HRMs) in next-generation sequencing (NGS).

A Amudhan Kannan (University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX) G Gilbert Zvikomborero Murimwa (Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) J John C. Mansour (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) D Daniel Ellis T Tarek Sawas (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) H Hendrikus Dutch Vanderveldt (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) S Samantha Blake Foley (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) V Veronica Coleman (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) N Naveen Rajamohan (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) G Gaurav Khatri (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) J Jason B. Fleming H Herbert J. Zeh (Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) N Nisa Kubiliun (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) P Patricio M. Polanco (Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX)

Abstract

704 Background: HRMs in NGS have demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for predicting advanced neoplasia in patients with IPMNs. However, the outcomes of surveillance in patients who tested negative for these HRMs have not been investigated in prior studies. This study aimed to identify the predictors of progression in patients with negative NGS results for HRMs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent NGS testing between 2016 and 2023 in our pancreatic cancer prevention program. Patients without IPMNs (i.e., negative for KRAS/GNAS), with HRMs, and those without at least one follow-up imaging post-NGS were excluded from the study. Progression was defined as the development of new or additional worrisome features or high-risk stigmata (per Kyoto guidelines), or advanced neoplasia (HGD/PDAC) following NGS testing. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify predictors of progression. Results: A total of 543 patients underwent NGS testing during the study period, of which 210 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up duration was 22 months (IQR = 12-36). Of these, 72 patients developed progression following NGS testing. A total of 11 patients underwent surgical resection, and 5 of them had HGD. Factors predictive of progression included a history of smoking (HR = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.06 - 2.86), larger cyst size (HR = 1.09; 95% CI = 1.03 - 1.16), and the presence of a dilated main pancreatic duct (MPD) (HR = 2.56; 95% CI = 1.5 - 4.4) prior to NGS testing. The median time to progression for patients with worrisome features was 33 months, compared to 59 months for those without worrisome features at baseline. Similarly, the median time to progression for patients with cysts ≥ 2 cm was 38 months, compared to 57 months for those with cysts < 2 cm. Conclusions: Patients who test negative for high-risk mutations in NGS are not exempt from the risk of progression. Any smoking history and presence of any worrisome features before NGS testing showed to be independent predictors of disease progression. For patients with smoking history, worrisome features or cysts ≥ 2 cm, frequent surveillance should be recommended following NGS testing. Results of Cox proportional hazards regression model for identifying the predictors of progression. Variables Hazards ratio (HR) 95% Confidence Interval P-value Age 0.99 0.96 – 1.01 0.257 Male sex 1.02 0.62 – 1.7 0.93 White race 1.07 0.63 – 0.83 0.8 Family history of pancreatic cancer 0.6 0.26 – 1.36 0.22 Personal history of other cancers 0.95 0.56 – 1.62 0.86 Diabetes 1.22 0.72 – 2.05 0.46 Any history of smoking 1.74 1.06 – 2.86 0.03* Pre-NGS cyst size (cm) 1.09 1.03 – 1.16 0.006* Pre-NGS dilated main pancreatic duct (≥5mm) 2.56 1.5 – 4.4 0.001* Pre-NGS presence of mural nodules 0.32 0.04 – 2.37 0.26 *Significant p-value.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 4_suppl
Published February 01, 2025
Pages 704-704
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (14)

A

Amudhan Kannan

University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX

G

Gilbert Zvikomborero Murimwa

Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

J

John C. Mansour

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

D

Daniel Ellis

T

Tarek Sawas

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

H

Hendrikus Dutch Vanderveldt

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

S

Samantha Blake Foley

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

V

Veronica Coleman

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

N

Naveen Rajamohan

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

G

Gaurav Khatri

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

J

Jason B. Fleming

H

Herbert J. Zeh

Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

N

Nisa Kubiliun

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

P

Patricio M. Polanco

Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX