Outcomes of stem cell boost (SCB) versus supportive care alone for prolonged cytopenias after chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): A muli-center real-world analysis

C Cindy Varga (7Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, United States) M Myra Robinson (1Advocate Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, United States) J James Davis (Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC) H Hamza Hashmi (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York) T Thomas Martin (16Department of Hematology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) A Anupama Kumar (1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States) D Douglas Sborov (9University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt lake City, United States) C Charlotte Wagner D Doris Hansen (1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States) O Omar Alexis Castaneda Puglianini (1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States) L Leyla Shune E Evguenia Bhurtel (1The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, United States) A Aimaz Afrough (Myeloma, Waldenstrom’s, and Amyloidosis Program, Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (A.A.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.) L Larry Anderson (5UT Southwestern Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, United States) B Binod Dhakal (2Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI) M Megan Herr (15Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States) S Shambavi Richard (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York) A Alex Lieberman-Cribbin (12Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States) D Daniel Sherbenou (1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Division of Hematology, Aurora, United States) P Peter Forsberg (7Colorado Blood Cancer Institute, Hematology, Denver, United States) S Sneha Purvey (16Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, United States) J Jack Khouri (1Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland, United States) Y Yi Lin S Surbhi Sidana (Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA) S Shonali Midha (13Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States) A Asad Haider (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) K Krina Patel (4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) M Mehmet Kocoglu (University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, United States) C Christopher Ferreri (7Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, United States)

Abstract

Abstract Background: Prolonged cytopenias are a well-recognized complication following CAR-T therapy, leading to increased morbidity and healthcare utilization. Autologous SCB offers a potential strategy to promote hematologic recovery. We conducted a retrospective multi-institutional analysis across 18 centers comparing outcomes of SCB versus supportive care alone in RRMM patients who experienced prolonged cytopenias >30 days after CAR-T infusion. Methods: Patients were included if they received SCB within 1 year after commercial CAR-T between 6/2021 and 3/2024. To identify matched controls, we reviewed other CAR-T recipients from the same consortium and selected those with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of <0.72x109/L and platelet count of <21K at day 30 post-infusion-thresholds representing the 75th percentile of cytopenia severity in the SCB cohort. These criteria ensured control patients had comparable hematologic toxicity but without SCB. Hematologic recovery in the SCB cohort was assessed using the CIBMTR engraftment criteria. For the non-SCB (nSCB) group, cell counts were analyzed cross-sectionally at day 90 post-CAR-T and compared to the SCB cohort with Kruskal Wallis tests. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan Meier methods. Results: Of the 590 CAR-T recipients, 91 patients (15.4%) developed prolonged cytopenias; 39 patients received SCB and 52 did not. SCB patients more frequently had ISS stage III disease (23.1% vs. 11.5%), exrtamedullary disease (59% vs. 46.2%) and penta-refractory status (43.6% vs. 34.6%). The median number of prior lines of therapy was 6 in both cohorts. Thirteen patients (33.3%) in the SCB and 11 (21.2%) in the nSCB received high intensity infusional chemotherapy (DCEP/PACE/HyperCVAD). Pre-CAR-T cytopenias tended to be less frequent in the SCB vs. nSCB cohort: ANC <1000 in 5.1% vs. 13.5%, Hgb <8 in 23.1% vs. 21.2%, and platelets <50K in 28.2% vs. 40.4%. Median plasmacytosis in the bone marrow prior to CAR-T in the SCB group was 35% and 47.5% in the nSCB group. In the SCB cohort, 2 patients harbored DNMT3A mutations, one of whom had CCUS. Ide-cel was administered in 64.8% and cilta-cel in 35.2% of all patients. The rates and grades of cytokine release syndrome did not differ between groups. Six patients (15.4%) had HLH in the SCB group vs. none in the control group. All (100%) SCB patients received growth factor support; 58% also received TPO agonists. In the nSCB group, 43 patients (82.7%) received growth factor, and 16 patients (30.8%) received TPO agonists. Out of 24 pre-SCB bone marrow biopsies available, only 1 patient had relapsed MM while the remainder had hypocellular marrows. Median CD34+ cell dose was 2.93 million/kg (range: 1.76-23.55) administered at a median of 53 days post-CAR-T (range 24-265). All but one patient (97.4%) in the SCB group achieved hematologic recovery; median time to recovery was 24 days (range 9-87). No new toxicities attributable to SCB were observed. On day 90 post CAR-T infusion, SCB patients had higher median ANC (2.12 vs. 1.59x109/L, p=0.277), Hgb (10.6 vs. 8.7g/dL, p=0.002), and platelet counts (135 vs. 35K/L (p<0.001). Minimal residual disease negativity was achieved in 82.4% (SCB) vs. 83.3% (nSCB). Infections occured in 53.8% and 48.1% of SCB and nSCB cohorts. All serious infections occurred prior to SCB. There were 12 deaths in the SCB group (7 from disease progression, 2 from infection, 1 from neurotoxicity (NT), and 1 unknown) and 27 in the nSCB group (22 from progression, 3 from infection, 1 from HLH, 1 from NT). After a median follow-up period of 12.6 months in the SCB cohort and 11.6 months in the nSCB arm, the mPFS was 11.0 months and 8.2 months, respectively. The mPFS was 10.6 months (SCB) and 5.8 months (nSCB) (p=0.216), and 11.0 months (SCB) and 10.9 months (nSCB), for ide-cel and cilta-cel treated-patients, respectively. Median OS was not reached vs.12.3 months in the SCB vs. nSCB groups, respectively. Conclusion: Overall, SCB was safe and effective in promoting rapid hematologic recovery in nearly all patients. Compared to controls, SCB recipeints had significantly higher Hgb and platelet levels by day 90 post-CAR-T infusion. SCB was associated wih a near doubling of PFS in patients who received ide-cel, though interpretation is limited by non-randomized design and small sample size. Further study is needed to optimize paient selection, timing, and integration of SCB into CAR-T care.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 1035-1035
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (29)

C

Cindy Varga

7Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, United States

M

Myra Robinson

1Advocate Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, United States

J

James Davis

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC

H

Hamza Hashmi

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York

T

Thomas Martin

16Department of Hematology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

A

Anupama Kumar

1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

D

Douglas Sborov

9University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt lake City, United States

C

Charlotte Wagner

D

Doris Hansen

1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States

O

Omar Alexis Castaneda Puglianini

1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States

L

Leyla Shune

E

Evguenia Bhurtel

1The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, United States

A

Aimaz Afrough

Myeloma, Waldenstrom’s, and Amyloidosis Program, Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (A.A.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

L

Larry Anderson

5UT Southwestern Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, United States

B

Binod Dhakal

2Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI

M

Megan Herr

15Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States

S

Shambavi Richard

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York

A

Alex Lieberman-Cribbin

12Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States

D

Daniel Sherbenou

1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Division of Hematology, Aurora, United States

P

Peter Forsberg

7Colorado Blood Cancer Institute, Hematology, Denver, United States

S

Sneha Purvey

16Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, United States

J

Jack Khouri

1Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland, United States

Y

Yi Lin

S

Surbhi Sidana

Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA

S

Shonali Midha

13Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States

A

Asad Haider

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

K

Krina Patel

4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

M

Mehmet Kocoglu

University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

C

Christopher Ferreri

7Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, United States