Outcomes of immunotherapy in hormone receptor–positive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Abstract
e13094 Background: Immunotherapy offers a promising approach for triple negative breast cancer; however, its effectiveness and safety remain uncertain in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. Here, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate efficacy and safety in HR+ breast cancer patients who received immunotherapy (intervention) versus patients who received traditional treatment (control). Methods: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov following PRISMA guidelines and eleven studies reporting outcomes of immunotherapy in HR+ breast cancer were included after screening of 313 studies. Inter-study variance was assessed using the Der Simonian-Laird Estimator, and pooled analysis was conducted with 95% confidence intervals using the ‘meta’ package in R (version 4.16-2). Results: A total of 2308 patients (intervention:1256, control 1052) from 11 clinical trials (2020-2024) were included in the analysis. The median age was 54.1 (24-87) years and majority were female (99.6%, n = 996/1000). All patients had HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer with 97.5% (n = 2250) having stage IV. The median follow-up was 19.7 months (0.4-51.8). Immunotherapies administered in intervention arm included pembrolizumab (63%, n = 793), nivolumab (22%, n = 278), eftilagimod alpha (9%, n = 114), and atezolizumab (6%, n = 71). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 0-5). When compared between intervention and control groups, the risk ratios for overall response (OR), complete response (CR), and partial response (PR) were 1.20 (95% CI: 0.92 - 1.55, I 2 = 0, p = 0.4, n = 409), 1.63 (95% CI 1.34-1.97, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.6, n = 1788), and 1.03 (95% CI 0.54-1.94, I 2 = 11%, p = 0.32, n = 196), respectively. The risk ratios for stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were 1.37 (95% CI 0.95-1.99, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.69, n = 196) and 0.52 (95% CI 0.15-1.8, I 2 = 81%, n = 108, p = 0.3, n = 196). The risk ratios for therapy-related adverse events (TRAE) and overall mortality (OM) were 1.29% (95% CI 1.04-1.6, I 2 = 69%, p = 0.01, n = 2218) and 1.87 (95% CI 0.89-3.9, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.79, n = 831), respectively. Conclusions: Immunotherapy resulted in higher response rates but increased adverse events and mortality rates were encountered. Large cohort studies are needed to further explore the potential of immunotherapy in HR+ breast cancer.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (11)
Muhammad Fareed Khalid
Danbury Hospital, Danbury, CT
Amir Kasaeian
Nouman Aziz
6Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, United States
Umar Akram
3Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan
Hediyeh Alemi
1The Mikael Rayaan Foundation Global Research Training Institute (MRF GRTI), Kansas City, United States
Iman Oskouie
Urology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Muhammad Kashif Amin
2The Mikael Rayaan Foundation Global Research Training Institute (MRF GRTI), Kansas City, United States
Sarmad Zaman Warraich
3Medical University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
Iqra Anwar
Michael Vishal Jaglal
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
Moazzam Shahzad
10H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States