Outcomes of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cytoreduction in peritoneal metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Survival benefit and impact of germline genetic mutations.

A Ahmed Abdelhakeem (2Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, United States) J Jakob Skyler Hamilton (Division of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) A Alicia Hou (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) N Nayef Hikmat Abdel-Razeq (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) N Nency Ganatra (2Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas, Internal Medicine, Beaumont, United States) D Dina Elantably (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) O Oluwatayo Adeoye (1Mayo Clinic, Hematology/Oncology, Rochester, United States) J Jason S. Starr (Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) U Umair Majeed (Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) C Conor O'Donnell (School of Physics, University College Dublin 1 , Dublin 4, Dublin D04 P7W1,) J Jeremy Clifton Jones (Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) H Hani M. Babiker (Division of Hematology Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL)

Abstract

e16435 Background: Peritoneal metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is historically associated with a dismal prognosis and limited response to systemic therapy alone. The role of locoregional therapy remains controversial. This study evaluated the survival impact and safety of HIPEC, with or without cytoreductive surgery (CRS), compared to standard-of-care systemic therapy in patients with peritoneal metastatic PDAC. Methods: We conducted a comparative analysis of 130 patients with peritoneal metastatic PDAC, comprising a study cohort treated with HIPEC (n = 33) and a control group treated with systemic chemotherapy alone (Non-HIPEC, n = 97). HIPEC patients received induction chemotherapy (predominantly FOLFIRINOX) followed by HIPEC ± CRS. Co-primary endpoints included 12 months survival, and 6 months progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints evaluated Overall Survival (OS ), safety of CRS, and impact of germline mutation status on survival. Study was approved under IRB protocol 25-008762. Results: The 12-month OS rate was significantly higher in the HIPEC group compared to the chemotherapy-only control group (100% vs. 52.6%, P < 0.001). The 6-month PFS rate in the HIPEC group was 63.0% vs. 47.94 in-only control group (P < 0.001). For secondary endpoints, the HIPEC group demonstrated a significantly longer median OS of 33.0 months vs. 17.0 months for controls (P < 0.001). Within the HIPEC cohort, the addition of CRS (n = 25) significantly improved outcomes compared to HIPEC alone (n = 8): median OS improved from 21.5 to 36.0 months (P = 0.03). Germline testing was performed in 61% of HIPEC patients and 48% of controls, identifying pathogenic mutations in 25% and 17%, respectively. Identified pathogenic mutations in both groups included ATM (n = 4), MUTYH (n = 2), BRCA2 (n = 1), CHEK2 (n = 1), PALB2 (n = 1), and KIT (n = 1). In the control group, specific mutations drove divergent outcomes; ATM median OS: 23.5 months vs. MUTYH : 8.0 months (P = 0.04). Conversely, in the HIPEC+CRS cohort, survival was excellent regardless of genetic profile: mutation carriers achieved a median OS of 33.0 months compared to 31.0 months in wild-type patients (P = 0.85). Despite a 34.8% postoperative complication rate in the HIPEC group, there was no perioperative mortality. Conclusions: In selected patients with peritoneal metastatic PDAC, HIPEC provides a substantial survival advantage over systemic therapy alone, achieving a 100% 12-month survival rate and more than doubling the median overall survival. Importantly, germline mutation status did not preclude survival benefit, with mutation carriers deriving equal efficacy from the multimodal approach. These findings support HIPEC+CRS as a highly effective strategy that may overcome adverse biologic drivers.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

A

Ahmed Abdelhakeem

2Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, United States

J

Jakob Skyler Hamilton

Division of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

A

Alicia Hou

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

N

Nayef Hikmat Abdel-Razeq

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

N

Nency Ganatra

2Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas, Internal Medicine, Beaumont, United States

D

Dina Elantably

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

O

Oluwatayo Adeoye

1Mayo Clinic, Hematology/Oncology, Rochester, United States

J

Jason S. Starr

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

U

Umair Majeed

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

C

Conor O'Donnell

School of Physics, University College Dublin 1 , Dublin 4, Dublin D04 P7W1,

J

Jeremy Clifton Jones

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

H

Hani M. Babiker

Division of Hematology Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL