Outcomes of atypical <i>EGFR</i> mutations in early-stage <i>EGFR</i> -mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Abstract
8034 Background: Adjuvant osimertinib (osi) improves survival outcomes in patients (pts) with early-stage EGFR -mutated NSCLC harboring the classical EGFR exon 19 deletions (ex19del) or L858R mutation after surgery or chemoradiotherapy. Pts with early-stage NSCLC harboring atypical EGFR mutations were excluded from the respective clinical trials. Outcomes in this pt population remain unknown. Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of pts with stage IA-IIIC EGFR -mutated NSCLC (2010-2024) who were classified into two groups: those with tumors harboring classical EGFR mutations (c- EGFR : ex19del or L858R) or atypical EGFR mutations (a- EGFR : non-ex19del or L858R). Kaplan-Meier analyses compared disease-free survival (DFS), central nervous system (CNS) DFS, and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox regression adjusted for disease stage, definitive therapy, and adjuvant therapy. Results: Among 417 pts, 293 had tumors harboring c- EGFR and 124 had a- EGFR mutations. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (Table). Median follow-up was 4 years. Among pts not treated with adjuvant osi (n = 346), a- EGFR was associated with a significantly lower 3-year DFS compared to c- EGFR (52.5% vs 71.2%; HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.21-2.42; P = 0.003). Compared to c- EGFR , a- EGFR had higher rates of recurrence to the ipsilateral lung (24% vs 14%) and bone (12% vs 6%). A- EGFR was associated with a significantly lower 3-year CNS DFS (81.3% vs 87.1%; P = 0.002) and 5-year OS (77.7% vs 85.6%; P = 0.007) compared to c- EGFR . Among pts with a- EGFR mutations, EGFR exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) were associated with a significantly reduced 3-year DFS compared to other alterations (35.9% vs 68.2%; HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.10-3.77; P = 0.013), and with a lower 3-year CNS DFS (70.9% vs 92.2%; P = 0.028) and trend towards lower 5-year OS (71.3% vs 84.4%; P = 0.141). Among pts who underwent surgery for stage IB-IIIA NSCLC (n = 209), adjuvant osi improved 3-year DFS among c- EGFR (84.2% with osi vs 63.4% without osi) whereas a- EGFR had a lower 3-year DFS (36.4%; P < 0.001), which was driven by EGFR ex20ins compared to other alterations (19.9% vs 59.2%; P = 0.003). Conclusions: Atypical EGFR mutations are associated with inferior survival outcomes compared to classical EGFR mutations in early-stage NSCLC. EGFR ex20ins appear to drive poor outcomes among the atypical EGFR mutations. Novel adjuvant therapy strategies are warranted to improve definitive treatment of early-stage atypical EGFR -mutated NSCLC. Classical EGFR , N=293 (%) Atypical EGFR , N=124 (%) Ex19del / L858R 46 / 54 - Ex20ins / G719X / L861Q / Other - 49 / 26 / 17 / 8 Stage IA / IB / II / III 35 / 23 / 17 / 25 38 / 14 / 23 / 25 Surgery / XRT / CRT 81 / 8 / 8 82 / 8 / 7 Neoadjuvant Chemo / EGFR TKI 4 / 3 7 / 2 Adjuvant Chemo / EGFR TKI / Osi 26 / 25 / 23 26 / 8 / 4 3-year DFS* 71.2 52.5 3-year CNS DFS* 87.1 81.3 5-year OS* 85.6 77.7 *In non-adjuvant osi cohort (n=346). Statistically significant difference.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (14)
Jacqueline V. Aredo
Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA
Surbhi Singhal
University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
Mandeep Banwait
Emily Guo
Department of Microbial Pathogenesis, Yale School of Medicine
Zofia Piotrowska
Heather A. Wakelee
Joseph B. Shrager
Mark F. Berry
Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA
Billy W. Loo
Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA
Maximilian Diehn
Carlos J. Suarez
Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA
Gerald Berry
Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
Jonathan W. Riess
Joel W. Neal