Outcomes of a feasibility and safety trial of tile-based radiation therapy with cesium-131 followed by external beam radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (NCT05342883).

C Clark C. Chen (Department of Neurosurgery, Brown University, Providence, RI) K Kris Smith (Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ) L Lindsey Sloan (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN) A Adam W. Nowlan (Piedmont Healthcare, Atlanta, GA) D David J. McCracken (Piedmont Healthcare, Atlanta, GA) K Kenneth Stuart Lee (ECU Health Medical Center, Greenville, NC) M M. Sean Peach (East Carolina University, Greenville, NC) A Angela Richardson (Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN) M Mohamed Khattab (University of South Florida, Tampa, FL) O Orin Bloch (UC Davis Health System, Sacramento, CA) E Eric L. Chang (Department of Radiation Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA) J John Dombrowski (Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO) K Ken Tatebe (Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL) I Imran Mohiuddin (AdventHealth, Orlando, FL) T Tolga Tuncer (The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, MO) M Mark Hoeprich A Adam Robin (Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI) A Adam Turner D David Brachman (GT Medical Technologies, Inc., Tempe, AZ) J John Wanebo (HonorHealth Research Institute, Scottsdale, AZ)

Abstract

2011 Background: Standard of care (SOC) of Glioblastoma (GBM) includes maximal safe resection followed by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with concomitant temozolomide (TMZ). This typically begins 4-6 weeks after surgery, during which rapid early progression (REP) occurs in ~50% of patients and is associated with worse survival, especially in unmethylated GBM (median OS ~13 months as per BN007). SOC treatment in BN007 showed ~38% ≥grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). GammaTile (GT Medical Technologies, Inc., Tempe, AZ), a tile-based radiation therapy (TBRT) with cesium-131 sources, immediately initiates radiation at resection, eliminating the 4-6-week delay. Methods: This is a prospective, single arm, open-label feasibility study across 15 US centers with a primary aim of assessing the safety and feasibility of combining resection + TBRT with an abbreviated course of EBRT with concurrent and adjuvant TMZ for newly diagnosed molecular GBM. Eligible patients were ≥18 years old; only patients with IDH-wildtype were included in survival analysis. MGMT and IDH underwent central lab review. Feasibility was defined as percent of patients who started EBRT+TMZ between 21-35 days post-surgery. Safety was assessed by incidence of ≥grade 3 TRAEs. REP was centrally reviewed. Additional aims included PFS and OS estimated using Kaplan-Meier. A planned sample size of 61 was chosen to ensure feasibility could be estimated with a ±10% degree of precision. Results are presented based on the modified intent to treat (mITT) population (enrolled patients who had surgery and confirmed GBM). Results: From 8/2022-8/2025, 70 patients were enrolled and had surgery; 67 of whom had confirmed GBM. Table 1 presents baseline characteristics. Median follow-up was 12.4 months. 93% started EBRT+TMZ; 74% started 21-35 days post-surgery. The median (range) of days from surgery to EBRT+TMZ was 29 (23-70) days. There were no delays due to EBRT planning. 39% of patients experienced a ≥grade 3 TRAE: 22% of patients were related to surgery only, 18% to radiation only, and 13% to surgery and radiation. 6.0% of patients showed REP. Median OS for patients with unmethylated MGMT was 16.5 months vs. 28.0 months for patients with methylated MGMT. The median PFS for patients with unmethylated MGMT was 9.3 months vs. not yet met for patients with methylated MGMT. Conclusions: Feasibility and safety are in line with SOC. REP had a notable reduction compared to literature. OS is encouraging. These data provide the basis for a phase 3 randomized trial (NCT07195591). Clinical trial information: NCT05342883 . Baseline characteristics. Parameter Detail n 67 Age, median 66 Male:Female, n 42:25 Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic), n 61 Race (White), n 56 EOR – GTR:not GTR, % 66:34 IDH-wildtype:mutated, n 66:1 MGMT promoter methylated:unmethylated, n 28:39

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 2011-2011
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

C

Clark C. Chen

Department of Neurosurgery, Brown University, Providence, RI

K

Kris Smith

Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ

L

Lindsey Sloan

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

A

Adam W. Nowlan

Piedmont Healthcare, Atlanta, GA

D

David J. McCracken

Piedmont Healthcare, Atlanta, GA

K

Kenneth Stuart Lee

ECU Health Medical Center, Greenville, NC

M

M. Sean Peach

East Carolina University, Greenville, NC

A

Angela Richardson

Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN

M

Mohamed Khattab

University of South Florida, Tampa, FL

O

Orin Bloch

UC Davis Health System, Sacramento, CA

E

Eric L. Chang

Department of Radiation Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

J

John Dombrowski

Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO

K

Ken Tatebe

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL

I

Imran Mohiuddin

AdventHealth, Orlando, FL

T

Tolga Tuncer

The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, MO

M

Mark Hoeprich

A

Adam Robin

Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI

A

Adam Turner

D

David Brachman

GT Medical Technologies, Inc., Tempe, AZ

J

John Wanebo

HonorHealth Research Institute, Scottsdale, AZ