Outcomes by lobular (lob) histology status at initial diagnosis in patients (pts) in the INAVO120 phase 3 trial with <i>PIK3CA</i> -mutated (mut), hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2–), endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer (aBC) treated with inavolisib (INAVO)/placebo (PBO) + palbociclib (PALBO) + fulvestrant (FULV).

N Nicholas C. Turner K Kevin Kalinsky (Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta) K Katherine E. Hutchinson (Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) Y Yanling Jin (Hoffmann–La Roche, Mississauga, ON, Canada) T Tiffany D. Clark (Genentech, San Francisco) K Komal L. Jhaveri (Breast and Early Drug Development Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York) S Sibylle Loibl (Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) C Cristina Saura Manich (Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain) C Christine Desmedt H Hans Wildiers S Seock-Ah Im (Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea) P Patrick Neven P Peter Schmid (Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London) D Dejan Juric (Mass General Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston) S Sherene Loi S Stephanie Hilz T Thomas J. Stout (Genentech, San Francisco)

Abstract

1079 Background: INAVO (a highly potent and selective PI3Kα inhibitor that also promotes mut p110α degradation) + PALBO + FULV is approved for PIK3CA mut, HR+, HER2–, endocrine-resistant aBC based on statistically significant and clinically meaningful investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) benefit over PBO + PALBO + FULV in INAVO120 (NCT04191499). We report exploratory analyses of treatment (tx) outcomes by lob histology status documented at initial diagnosis. Methods: Baseline characteristics, PFS, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR) were evaluated for 53 pts with reported lob only and 64 with reported lob only or mixed lob (lob + ≥1 other selected subtype) histology at initial diagnosis. PIK3CA mut distribution, and association of histology and PFS with CDH1 alteration (alt) status, were also assessed. Results: At the clinical data cut-off for the updated PFS and final OS analyses (Nov 15, 2024), 24 and 29 pts with lob only histology, and 29 and 35 pts with mixed lob histology, were randomized to the INAVO and PBO arms, respectively. Baseline characteristics were balanced across tx arms. Median follow-up was 34.2 and 32.3 months (m) in the INAVO and PBO arms, respectively. Pathogenic CDH1 alts were more frequent in the lob only (65.2%) and mixed lob (58.9%) subgroups compared with no lob histology (6.3%). Efficacy by lob status is shown in the Table. PIK3CA mut distribution was similar across histologies. PFS benefit of INAVO over PBO was observed regardless of baseline CDH1 alt status (hazard ratio 0.3 for CDH1 alt and 0.5 for no alt detected). Conclusions: In this INAVO120 exploratory analysis, efficacy was improved with INAVO vs PBO, regardless of lob histology status at initial diagnosis and CDH1 alt status. This further supports the benefit of INAVO + PALBO + FULV in PIK3CA mut, HR+, HER2–, endocrine-resistant aBC. Clinical trial information: NCT04191499 . Lob only: INAVO n = 24 Non-lob: INAVO n = 137 Lob only: PBO n = 29 Non-lob: PBO n = 135 Mixed lob: INAVO n = 29 Non-mixed lob: INAVO n = 132 Mixed lob: PBO n = 35 Non-mixed lob: PBO n = 129 PFS, m (95% CI) 21.7 (9.3–25.8) 17.2 (11.6–24.3) 7.2 (3.7–9.4) 7.4 (5.8–9.7) 21.7 (11.3–27.9) 16.6 (11.2–24.2) 7.2 (3.8–9.4) 7.4 (5.8–9.7) OS, m (95% CI) NR (18.1–NR) 33.0 (27.1–44.8) 24.1 (11.1–NR) 27.0 (22.8–40.7) NR (28.4–NR) 33.0 (27.0–38.0) 24.1 (11.1–NR) 28.0 (22.8–40.7) ORR, n (%; 95% CI) 15 (62.5; 40.6–81.2) 86 (62.8; 54.1–70.9) 6 (20.7; 8.0–39.7) 40 (29.6; 22.1–38.1) 19 (65.5; 45.7–82.1) 82 (62.1; 53.3–70.4) 7 (20.0; 8.4–36.9) 39 (30.2; 22.5–38.9) DoR, m (95% CI) 21.2 (9.3–NR) 18.7 (12.2–28.3) 11.1 (8.5–NR) 10.7 (7.5–20.2) 20.3 (9.6–NR) 18.8 (11.1–28.7) 11.1 (3.1–NR) 11.1 (7.5–20.2) CI, confidence interval; NR, not reached.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 1079-1079
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

N

Nicholas C. Turner

K

Kevin Kalinsky

Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta

K

Katherine E. Hutchinson

Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA

Y

Yanling Jin

Hoffmann–La Roche, Mississauga, ON, Canada

T

Tiffany D. Clark

Genentech, San Francisco

K

Komal L. Jhaveri

Breast and Early Drug Development Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York

S

Sibylle Loibl

Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

C

Cristina Saura Manich

Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain

C

Christine Desmedt

H

Hans Wildiers

S

Seock-Ah Im

Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea

P

Patrick Neven

P

Peter Schmid

Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London

D

Dejan Juric

Mass General Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston

S

Sherene Loi

S

Stephanie Hilz

T

Thomas J. Stout

Genentech, San Francisco