Organ- and histology-specific molecular and immune landscape of metastatic breast cancer.

G Guilherme Nader Marta (Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) S Sachin Kumar Deshmukh (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ) K Kristina Fanucci (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) A Adrian V. Lee (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) S Steffi Oesterreich (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) S Sharon Wu (Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) J Joanne Xiu P Pooja Prem Advani (Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) P Priscila Barreto Coelho (Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL) M Maryam B. Lustberg (Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT) S Stuart J. Schnitt (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) N Nancy Lin (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) S Sara M. Tolaney (Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) E Erica L. Mayer O Otto Metzger (Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston) G George W. Sledge R Rinath Jeselsohn

Abstract

1024 Background: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is a distinct breast cancer (BC) subtype with dissemination patterns differing from invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST). While genomic differences between ILC and IBC-NST have been described, the extent to which molecular and immune profiles vary by metastatic organ and histology is poorly characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate organ- and histology-specific molecular features of metastatic BC (mBC). Patients with metastatic IBC-NST or pure ILC underwent NGS (592, NextSeq; WES/WTS, NovaSeq; Caris Life Sciences). Tumor mutational burden (high ≥10 mut/Mb), PD-L1 expression (22C3), and immune cell fractions (RNAseq deconvolution, quanTIseq) were assessed. Analyses were restricted to sites with ≥10 biopsies per histology. Comparisons used chi-square or Mann–Whitney U tests with multiple testing correction (q < 0.05). Results: A total of 2645 mBC biopsies (605 ILC; 2040 IBC-NST) were analyzed (Table). In ILC, ERBB2 mut frequency differed by metastatic site (q<0.01), with higher prevalence in liver (32.7%) and lower in gastrointestinal (GI) lesions (3.7%). In IBC-NST, ESR1 and GATA3 mut and FGFR1 amplification were enriched in liver metastases, whereas PD-L1 expression was highest in skin (20.7%) and lowest in liver (5.0%). No organ-specific differences were observed for PIK3CA, AKT, PTEN, BRCA1/2 or RB1 . Across metastatic sites, both ILC and IBC-NST showed differences in B cells, macrophages (M1/M2), neutrophils, NK cells, dendritic cells, CD8+ T cells, and Tregs (all q < 0.05); CD4+ T-cell differences were observed only in IBC-NST (q = 0.002). In organ-specific ILC vs IBC-NST comparisons, CDH1 mut were more frequent in ILC across sites, along with higher PIK3CA mut in skin (ILC 51.3% vs IBC-NST 34.4%) and higher ERBB2 mut in liver (32.7% vs 3.3%), whereas a higher TP53 mut frequency was observed in IBC-NST in skin (28.5% vs 52.3%) and lymph nodes (LND) (23.5% vs 55.5%) (all q < 0.01). Conclusions: mBC exhibits marked organ-specific molecular and immune heterogeneity that differs by histology. These findings support histology- and site-aware interpretation of metastatic biopsies and may inform biomarker assessment and treatment decisions in advanced disease. BC-NST ILC Skin LND Bone Breast Liver Perit. CNS q-value Skin LND Bone Breast GI Liver GYN Perit. CNS q-value N (specimens) 785 401 109 361 220 15 44 - 172 84 62 56 56 54 43 37 11 - ERBB2 mut (%) 3.2 3.1 3.2 2.3 3.3 7.1 2.5 1.0 7.1 7.4 16.4 15.4 3.7 32.7 2.4 5.7 11.1 <0.01 ESR1 mut (%) 9.4 5.2 8.3 16.0 28.2 7.1 2.4 0.0 7.8 7.2 8.9 9.8 16.7 26.0 4.9 20.0 0.0 0.9 FGFR1 amp (%) 10.1 6.6 5.6 12.8 16.5 0.0 9.7 0.02 4.4 3.4 6.7 6.1 2.4 5.6 7.7 18.5 0.0 1.0 IHC-PD-L1 (%) 20.7 - 5.3 16.0 5.0 11.1 10.3 0.02 8.9 - 5.0 5.7 6.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 1.0 TMB-High (%) 10.7 10.1 8.8 8.8 8.5 14.3 21.4 0.8 27.6 11.0 19.6 28.0 11.3 19.6 9.8 32.4 22.2 0.8 Perit: peritoneum; CNS: central nervous system; GYN: genital tract.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 1024-1024
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

G

Guilherme Nader Marta

Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

S

Sachin Kumar Deshmukh

Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ

K

Kristina Fanucci

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

A

Adrian V. Lee

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

S

Steffi Oesterreich

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

S

Sharon Wu

Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

J

Joanne Xiu

P

Pooja Prem Advani

Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

P

Priscila Barreto Coelho

Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL

M

Maryam B. Lustberg

Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

S

Stuart J. Schnitt

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

N

Nancy Lin

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

S

Sara M. Tolaney

Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

E

Erica L. Mayer

O

Otto Metzger

Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston

G

George W. Sledge

R

Rinath Jeselsohn