Optimal timing of endocrine therapy interruption for pregnancy in young women with hormone receptor–positive early breast cancer.

F Floriane Jochum (Institut Curie - Institut Hospitalo Universitaire - Women's Cancer, Paris, France) A Anne-Sophie Hamy (Institut Curie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France) K Kerollos Wanis (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) P Paul Gougis (Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, INSERM U1136, CLIP2 Galilée (P.G.)) F Florence Coussy (Institut Curie, Paris, France) M Marc Espie (APHP Hopital Saint Louis, Paris, France) S Sylvie Giacchetti F Fabien Reyal M Marine Osada (CHRU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France) C Cherif Akladios E Elise Dumas (Institut Curie, Paris, France)

Abstract

627 Background: The POSITIVE trial showed that temporary interruption of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) after 18–30 months to attempt pregnancy did not increase short-term recurrence risk in young women with hormone receptor–positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). However, whether this effect varies by baseline recurrence risk and the timing of interruption remains uncertain. Methods: Using the French National Health Data System (SNDS), we emulated two target trials among women aged ≤42 years with early-stage HR+ BC diagnosed between 2011 and 2020. Trial 1 emulated the POSITIVE design, comparing ET interruption at 18–30 months with uninterrupted ET for ≥24 months. Trial 2 compared nine ET-interruption windows (6-month intervals) with uninterrupted ET for ≥24 or ≥60 months. The primary endpoint was the 5-year risk of BC events. Analyses used a clone–censor–weight approach with marginal structural models. Results: In Trial 1 (n = 10,835), ET interruption at 18–30 months was associated with a 5-year BC event risk of 17.2%, compared with 16.0% for uninterrupted ET ≥24 months (risk difference, 1.2 percentage points; 95% CI, −0.7 to 3.1). Risk varied by baseline recurrence risk: interruption had minimal impact in low- or intermediate-risk women (risk difference, −0.6 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.7 to 1.6) but increased risk in high-risk women (risk difference, 5.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.8 to 10.0). In Trial 2 (n = 22,916), earlier ET interruption was associated with higher 5-year BC risk, which decreased with longer prior ET duration. Compared with uninterrupted ET ≥24 months, interruption at 6–12 months increased risk by 8.3 percentage points, whereas interruption at 24–30 months increased risk by 2.7 percentage points. Low- or intermediate-risk women showed comparable risk when interruption occurred at 24–30 months, whereas high-risk women required ≥36–42 months of ET to achieve similar safety. Among pregnancy-seeking women, 64% conceived, and 47% resumed ET. Conclusions: The oncologic impact of temporary ET interruption depends on baseline recurrence risk and prior ET duration. Interruption after 24 months appears safe for low- or intermediate-risk women, whereas high-risk patients may benefit from delaying interruption to at least 36 months. These findings support a risk-adapted approach to fertility counseling.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 627-627
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (11)

F

Floriane Jochum

Institut Curie - Institut Hospitalo Universitaire - Women's Cancer, Paris, France

A

Anne-Sophie Hamy

Institut Curie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France

K

Kerollos Wanis

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

P

Paul Gougis

Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, INSERM U1136, CLIP2 Galilée (P.G.)

F

Florence Coussy

Institut Curie, Paris, France

M

Marc Espie

APHP Hopital Saint Louis, Paris, France

S

Sylvie Giacchetti

F

Fabien Reyal

M

Marine Osada

CHRU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

C

Cherif Akladios

E

Elise Dumas

Institut Curie, Paris, France