Optimal maintenance therapy strategy for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Insights from a cohort study in an endemic region.
Abstract
6041 Background: Managing metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) remains challenging due to its high incidence and mortality rates. While maintenance therapy shows promising potential, the optimal strategy remains unclear. A prior ranking question is if combined therapy of anti-PD-1 antibodies and capecitabine an effective maintenance strategy for mNPC patients who achieved disease control after first-line therapy. Methods: Eligible patients with mNPC who achieved disease control following first-line therapy and subsequently received maintenance therapy were included at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between 2018 to 2023. Progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards model and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis were applied to adjust for confounders. Based on interaction effects, stratification analysis was performed. A sensitivity analysis was based on the E-value from the weighted Cox proportional hazards model. Results: This cohort study included 300 mNPC patients receiving maintenance therapy with monotherapy (n=211), anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (n=94) or capecitabine (n=117), and their combination (n=89). 234 patients (78.0%) were male, and the median age was 45 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 36–54). At median follow-up of 37.8 months (IQR: 35.6–40.1), combination maintenance significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to single-drug maintenance [median PFS: not reached vs 27.0 months; weighted hazard ratio (HR): 0.569, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.368-0.878, P = 0.011; E-value, 2.32], though no improvement in overall survival was observed. Stratification analysis revealed enhanced efficacy of combination maintenance in patients without prior local treatment (HR: 0.411, 95% CI: 0.266–0.748, P = 0.004) or with elevated pre-maintenance Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA levels (HR: 0.312, 95% CI: 0.106–0.917, P = 0.034). No significant difference in prognosis was observed between capecitabine and anti-PD-1 monotherapy groups. Combination regimen obtained significantly superior progression-free survival compared to either monotherapy alone. The safety profile was similar between combination maintenance and single-drug groups. Conclusions: Combined anti-PD-1 and capecitabine maintenance therapy significantly improved prognosis in mNPC with disease control after first-line therapy, particularly in patients with elevated premaintenance EBV DNA levels or those without local treatment.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (16)
Zhuoying Luo
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Yue Xia
Yuping Zhao
Department of Geriatrics, Laboratory of Research and Translation for Geriatric Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Haoyang Huang
Ying Deng
Zejiang Zhan
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
Yingying Huang
Xun Cao
Xi Chen
Jiayu Zhou
Chixiong Liang
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Liang-Ru Ke
Xuehua Wei
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
Jin-Ling Duan
Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
Xing Lv
Surgical and Transplant ICU, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care
Hu Liang