Optimal maintenance therapy strategy for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Insights from a cohort study in an endemic region.

Z Zhuoying Luo (Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) Y Yue Xia Y Yuping Zhao (Department of Geriatrics, Laboratory of Research and Translation for Geriatric Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University) H Haoyang Huang Y Ying Deng Z Zejiang Zhan (Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China) Y Yingying Huang X Xun Cao X Xi Chen J Jiayu Zhou C Chixiong Liang (Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) L Liang-Ru Ke X Xuehua Wei (Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China) J Jin-Ling Duan (Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China) X Xing Lv (Surgical and Transplant ICU, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care) H Hu Liang

Abstract

6041 Background: Managing metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) remains challenging due to its high incidence and mortality rates. While maintenance therapy shows promising potential, the optimal strategy remains unclear. A prior ranking question is if combined therapy of anti-PD-1 antibodies and capecitabine an effective maintenance strategy for mNPC patients who achieved disease control after first-line therapy. Methods: Eligible patients with mNPC who achieved disease control following first-line therapy and subsequently received maintenance therapy were included at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between 2018 to 2023. Progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards model and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis were applied to adjust for confounders. Based on interaction effects, stratification analysis was performed. A sensitivity analysis was based on the E-value from the weighted Cox proportional hazards model. Results: This cohort study included 300 mNPC patients receiving maintenance therapy with monotherapy (n=211), anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (n=94) or capecitabine (n=117), and their combination (n=89). 234 patients (78.0%) were male, and the median age was 45 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 36–54). At median follow-up of 37.8 months (IQR: 35.6–40.1), combination maintenance significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to single-drug maintenance [median PFS: not reached vs 27.0 months; weighted hazard ratio (HR): 0.569, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.368-0.878, P = 0.011; E-value, 2.32], though no improvement in overall survival was observed. Stratification analysis revealed enhanced efficacy of combination maintenance in patients without prior local treatment (HR: 0.411, 95% CI: 0.266–0.748, P = 0.004) or with elevated pre-maintenance Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA levels (HR: 0.312, 95% CI: 0.106–0.917, P = 0.034). No significant difference in prognosis was observed between capecitabine and anti-PD-1 monotherapy groups. Combination regimen obtained significantly superior progression-free survival compared to either monotherapy alone. The safety profile was similar between combination maintenance and single-drug groups. Conclusions: Combined anti-PD-1 and capecitabine maintenance therapy significantly improved prognosis in mNPC with disease control after first-line therapy, particularly in patients with elevated premaintenance EBV DNA levels or those without local treatment.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 6041-6041
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

Z

Zhuoying Luo

Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Y

Yue Xia

Y

Yuping Zhao

Department of Geriatrics, Laboratory of Research and Translation for Geriatric Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

H

Haoyang Huang

Y

Ying Deng

Z

Zejiang Zhan

Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

Y

Yingying Huang

X

Xun Cao

X

Xi Chen

J

Jiayu Zhou

C

Chixiong Liang

Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

L

Liang-Ru Ke

X

Xuehua Wei

Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

J

Jin-Ling Duan

Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China

X

Xing Lv

Surgical and Transplant ICU, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care

H

Hu Liang