Optimal ferritin threshold to diagnose immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic syndrome (IEC-HS) following CAR-T therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)
Abstract
Abstract Background: IEC-HS is a potentially life-threatening complication following CAR-T therapy in RRMM. Reliable diagnostic biomarkers are needed to help expeditiously identify cases to initiate prompt treatment and supportive care. Serum ferritin, a routinely available laboratory parameter, is commonly elevated in IEC-HS and has been used to identify cases. However, ferritin can also be elevated in cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or secondary to baseline tumor-related inflammation. The optimal diagnostic threshold for post-CAR-T ferritin in IEC-HS in RRMM has not been previously established. Methods: This study used data from 15 centers within the US Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium to identify the optimal post-CAR-T ferritin threshold to distinguish RRMM patients (pts) with and without a diagnosis of IEC-HS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal threshold based on Youden's Index. The performance of the threshold was evaluated overall and stratified by CAR-T product (cilta-cel, ide-cel). Additional analyses included the temporal relationship of peak ferritin and IEC-HS diagnosis, the evaluation of IEC-HS criteria according to ferritin levels, comparison of IEC-HS criteria co-occurrence, and comprehensive baseline characteristic comparisons across ferritin strata. Results: Of 1502 RRMM CAR-T recipients (ide-cel, n=712; cilta-cel, n=790), 74 patients (4.9%) had a provider-determined diagnosis of IEC-HS. A post-CAR-T ferritin threshold of 7470 ng/mL was identified as optimal for distinguishing pts with and without IEC-HS (AUC 0.938). Sensitivity (0.904) and specificity (0.934) were both very high, indicating high discriminatory ability. Stratified ROC analyses showed near-identical optimal thresholds for cilta-cel (7450 ng/mL; sensitivity 0.885, specificity 0.936, AUC 0.94) and ide-cel (7470 ng/mL; sensitivity 0.952, specificity 0.933, AUC 0.95), indicating minimal impact of CAR-T product on ferritin's prognostic utility. Baseline pt characteristics (N=1,413) differed significantly by ferritin threshold. Pts above the ferritin threshold of 7470 (N=154) were younger (median 64 vs 67 years; p=0.004), more frequently male (65% vs 56%; p=0.043), had higher baseline ferritin (1,300 vs 187; p<0.001), higher ECOG at apheresis (p=0.001), more likely penta-refractory (p=0.016), had higher baseline bone marrow plasma cell burden (p<0.001), and had higher R-ISS scores (p<0.001). Evaluation of IEC-HS criteria (Hines et al, TCT 2023) demonstrated significantly higher rates of laboratory and clinical criteria, including hepatic transaminase elevation (43% vs 15%), hypofibrinogenemia (53% vs 0%), cytopenias (95% vs 81%), hypertriglyceridemia (43% vs 8%), ICANS (52% vs 23%), renal insufficiency (20% vs 0%), and soluble IL-2 receptor elevations (47% vs 4%), in pts with ferritin >7500 ng/mL compared to those with lower ferritin. Heatmap visualization revealed distinct patterns of co-occurring criteria in high- and low-ferritin groups. Assessment of the timing of peak ferritin and IEC-HS diagnosis among IEC-HS cases revealed a median difference of 0 days (IQR: -1, 0), suggesting simultaneous occurrence. Median time to max ferritin was 9 days (IQR 8,12) in IEC-HS pts compared to 8 days (IQR 5,10) in non-IEC-HS pts (Wilcoxon p<0.05). Conclusions: In this analysis of over 1500 patients, a post-CAR-T ferritin level of 7500 ng/mL robustly identifies RRMM pts with IEC-HS following either cilta-cel or ide-cel. Pts exceeding this threshold demonstrate marked enrichment in IEC-HS diagnostic criteria and significant differences in baseline characteristics, warranting further study of the role of ferritin in IEC-HS diagnosis and early intervention.
Article Details
Authors (49)
Jerry Lee
Alexandria Jensen
Hitomi Hosoya
Saurabh Zanwar
Oren Pasvolsky
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
Mahmoud Gaballa
4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
Christen Dillard
4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
Jack Khouri
1Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland, United States
Shahzad Raza
Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
Utkarsh Goel
6Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, United States
Faiz Anwer
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Vanna Hovanky
Masooma Rana
8Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
James Davis
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
Kimberly Green
14Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, United States
Aimaz Afrough
Myeloma, Waldenstrom’s, and Amyloidosis Program, Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (A.A.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Larry Anderson
5UT Southwestern Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, United States
Noa Biran
11Hackensack Meridian Health, Hackensack, United States
Eli Zolotov
11Hackensack Meridian Health, Hackensack, United States
Megan Herr
15Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
Hamza Hassan
7Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
Leyla Shune
Jeries Kort
1The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, United States
Christopher Ferreri
7Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, United States
Shebli Atrash
Levine Cancer Institute–Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
Cindy Varga
7Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, United States
Peter Voorhees
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Douglas Sborov
9University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt lake City, United States
Gliceida Fortuna
13Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, United States
Kelley Julian
6The University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, United States
Danai Dima
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
Rahul Banerjee
Ciara Louise Freeman
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States
Andrew Portuguese
2Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, United States
Raffaella Cassano Cassano
2Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, United States
Frederick Locke
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Hematology and Oncology, Tampa, United States
Karla J Salva
15Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
Lauren Peres
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States
Brett Reid
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States
Omar Alexis Castaneda Puglianini
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States
Ariel Grajales-Cruz
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States
Michael Jain
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Hematology and Oncology, Tampa, United States
Krina Patel
4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
Matthew Frank
2Stanford University School of Medicine, Medicine, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Stanford, United States
Yi Lin
Doris Hansen
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States
Surbhi Sidana
Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
Nirali Shah
32National Cancer Institute, Pediatric Oncology Branch, Bethesda, United States
Lekha Mikkilineni
Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States