OPTI-AML: Prospective Comparison of 28 vs.14 days of Venetoclax Induction with Azacitidine in Older Adults with AML

U Uma M Borate (The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States) Y Ying Huang T Tara L. Lin (University of Kansas, Fairway, Kansas, United States) S Shivani Handa (The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States) R Ronan Swords (OHSU Knight Cancer Institute Center for Hematologic Malignancies, Portland, Oregon, United States) C Curtis A. Lachowiez (Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States) E Elie Traer (Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States) W Wendy Stock O Olatoyosi Odenike (University of Chicago Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago) A Anand A Patel (University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States) M Maria R Baer (University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States) V Vu H. Duong (University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, United States) E Eytan M. Stein (Leukemia Service Department of Medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA) W William Blum (Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States) C Colin Anthony Vale (Emory Univeristy, Atlanta, Georgia, United States) E Emily Curran (University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States) Y Yazan F. Madanat (UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States) R Rebecca L. Olin (University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States) G Gary J. Schiller (David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States) A Angela D Nichols (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States) L Lacey Williams (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States) N Nyla A. Heerema M Mary F Johnson (MJBiostat LLC, Spring Lake, New Jersey, United States) T Timothy L Chen (The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States) S Sonja Marcus (The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, New York, United States) M Molly Martycz (The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States) M Mona Stefanos (OSU, Columbus, Ohio, United States) L Leonard Rosenberg (The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, New York, United States) L Louis James DeGennaro (Blood Cancer United, Washington, District of Columbia, United States) L Lore Gruenbaum (Blood Cancer United, Washington, District of Columbia, United States) A Amy Burd (The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, New York, United States) J John C Byrd (UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) B Brian J. Druker (Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States) R Ross L Levine (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States) A Ashley O Yocum (Blood Cancer United, Washington, District of Columbia, United States) A Alice S. Mims (The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States) J Joshua F Zeidner (University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States)

Abstract

Azacitidine (Aza) plus venetoclax (Ven) is standard treatment for older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed (ND) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The approved 28-day (D) Ven schedule is associated with prolonged cytopenias, causing frequent dose reductions and cycle delays. Retrospective studies show similar efficacy and reduced toxicity with abbreviated Ven dosing, but prospective data is lacking. We conducted OPTI-AML(NCT03013998), a prospective randomized phase 2 trial comparing 28D Ven (AV28) versus 14D (AV14) with Aza (75mg/m²x7D) for C1-2 in genomically agnostic ND-AML patients ≥60 years. The primary endpoint was complete remission (CR) rate achieved at any time with two cycles of therapy. Between 2023-2025, 169 patients received AV28 (n=83) or AV14 (n=86). CR across two cycles was 49.4% (AV28) versus 43% (AV14); difference of 6.4% [90%CI:-6.1% to 19.0%], not meeting non-inferiority criteria. Patients with NPM1/ IDH2 mutations had higher CR rates with AV28 (60.9% vs. 33.3%), while CR rates were equivalent (45%) for other subgroups. Composite CR rates were 80.7% (AV28) versus 68.6% (AV14) and MRD negativity was similar (77.6% vs. 76.5%). Although AV28 had more frequent treatment interruptions, count recovery after C2, grade ≥3 adverse events and early mortality were similar. In conclusion, the study did not demonstrate non-inferiority of AV14 compared with AV28 during C1-2 in an unselected ND-AML cohort. However, as the confidence interval for the difference covered 0, CR rate for AV28 was not significantly different than AV14. Certain subgroups may benefit from prolonged Ven exposure, but these findings require validation in larger studies, especially as triplet regimens evolve.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 1, Issue 1
Published July 28, 2026
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (37)

U

Uma M Borate

The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States

Y

Ying Huang

T

Tara L. Lin

University of Kansas, Fairway, Kansas, United States

S

Shivani Handa

The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States

R

Ronan Swords

OHSU Knight Cancer Institute Center for Hematologic Malignancies, Portland, Oregon, United States

C

Curtis A. Lachowiez

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States

E

Elie Traer

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States

W

Wendy Stock

O

Olatoyosi Odenike

University of Chicago Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago

A

Anand A Patel

University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States

M

Maria R Baer

University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

V

Vu H. Duong

University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

E

Eytan M. Stein

Leukemia Service Department of Medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

W

William Blum

Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States

C

Colin Anthony Vale

Emory Univeristy, Atlanta, Georgia, United States

E

Emily Curran

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Y

Yazan F. Madanat

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States

R

Rebecca L. Olin

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States

G

Gary J. Schiller

David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States

A

Angela D Nichols

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

L

Lacey Williams

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

N

Nyla A. Heerema

M

Mary F Johnson

MJBiostat LLC, Spring Lake, New Jersey, United States

T

Timothy L Chen

The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States

S

Sonja Marcus

The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, New York, United States

M

Molly Martycz

The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States

M

Mona Stefanos

OSU, Columbus, Ohio, United States

L

Leonard Rosenberg

The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, New York, United States

L

Louis James DeGennaro

Blood Cancer United, Washington, District of Columbia, United States

L

Lore Gruenbaum

Blood Cancer United, Washington, District of Columbia, United States

A

Amy Burd

The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, New York, United States

J

John C Byrd

UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

B

Brian J. Druker

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States

R

Ross L Levine

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States

A

Ashley O Yocum

Blood Cancer United, Washington, District of Columbia, United States

A

Alice S. Mims

The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States

J

Joshua F Zeidner

University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States